Re: FreeBSD Port: timeseal-1.0 - Bad system call

Kris Kennaway wrote: > peter bird wrote: >> pulsarity# timeseal >> Bad system call > > Use ktrace to determine what the syscall is. It uses compat.sigaction. 1199 timeseal CALL compat.sigaction 1199 timeseal RET compat.sigaction -1 errno 78 Function not implemented Björn ___

New version while port is on the waiting list

Hello porters, I have submitted a new port. While it was sitting in the PR database - and it is still there - I produced a new version. What can/should I do? Regards, Igor. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/m

portupgrade changed operation?

Hi, Using "portupgrade 2.4.1 (2008/01/29)". I have 509 packages, and a 1/2 dozen in HOLD_PKG. I went to run it today, and oddly it started doing things like : [Gathering depends for textproc/php5-xml done] [Gathering depends for archivers/php5-zlib .. done] [Gathering depends for por

Re: New version while port is on the waiting list

Igor Serikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Hello porters, > > I have submitted a new port. While it was sitting in the PR database - > and it is still there - I produced a new version. > What can/should I do? Just submit the new set of patches in a followup to the same PR. ___

Re: portupgrade changed operation?

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:01:42 -0500 (EST) "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ---> Skipping 'www/apache13' because a requisite port 'lang/perl5.8' > failed (specify -k to force) > > But I *DO* want apache upgraded, even if I have perl5.8 in > HOLD_PKG. > > It is behav

Re: New version while port is on the waiting list

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:05:34 -0800 Igor Serikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello porters, > > I have submitted a new port. While it was sitting in the PR database - > and it is still there - I produced a new version. > What can/should I do? > > Regards, > Igor. Send the new .shar (

Re: New version while port is on the waiting list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Igor Serikov wrote: >Hello porters, Hello, > > I have submitted a new port. While it was sitting in the PR database - > and it is still there - I produced a new version. > What can/should I do? Submit a followup with the new diff/shar Have a

caching problems

hey guys, our proxy is caching extremely old copies of the ports index and portaudit databases from freebsd.org. our admins claim that they cache the following files i need normally: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/auditfile.tbz http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2 since they have no no-cache pr

Re: Portupgrade not running get_notinstalled_depends (2.4.3_1, 2 vs 2.4.3_2, 2)

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:32 AM, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example, in my tests, if I have an alt-dep set for a package and > I install a port that depends on that package it'll still install > the original package rather than my alt-dep. In case anyone's interested or running int

Re: caching problems

> hey guys, our proxy is caching extremely old copies of the ports index > and portaudit databases from freebsd.org. our admins claim that they > cache the following files i need normally: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/auditfile.tbz > http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2 > > since they hav

portmaster did not replace port

Hi, I am trying to use portmaster to replace installed GnuPG 2 with GnuPG 1. portmaster -o security/gnupg1 gnupg-2.0.4 But it always ends with gnupg-2.0.4 re-installed again, so now I have both versions installed. Is it possible to use portmaster for this task? (gnupg-2.0.4 was misinstalled by

Re: caching problems

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:22:10 +0200 gareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hey guys, our proxy is caching extremely old copies of the ports index > and portaudit databases from freebsd.org. our admins claim that they > cache the following files i need normally: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/auditf

Re: portmaster did not replace port

Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use portmaster to replace installed GnuPG 2 with GnuPG 1. > portmaster -o security/gnupg1 gnupg-2.0.4 > > But it always ends with gnupg-2.0.4 re-installed again, so now I have > both versions installed. Is it possible to use portmaster for this tas

Re: New version while port is on the waiting list

On Friday 22 February 2008 17:05:34 Igor Serikov wrote: > Hello porters, > > I have submitted a new port. While it was sitting in the PR database - > and it is still there - I produced a new version. > What can/should I do? > > Regards, > Igor. > >

Re: portmaster did not replace port

Doug Barton wrote: Miroslav Lachman wrote: Hi, I am trying to use portmaster to replace installed GnuPG 2 with GnuPG 1. portmaster -o security/gnupg1 gnupg-2.0.4 But it always ends with gnupg-2.0.4 re-installed again, so now I have both versions installed. Is it possible to use portmaster for

Re: obexftp - call for testers

Thank you very much for testing. As of the L6i failing: maybe it's just another UUID (like siemens and sharp - see the obexftp(1) -U ). But this is way beyond the scope of my attempt. Judging from the upstreams wiki at http://dev.zuckschwerdt.org/openobex/wiki/SupportedPhonesMotorola the L6i is

net-im/psi update plans?

Hi, I was wondering what plans were in the works for net-im/psi version 0.11 and/or development snapshots of 0.12? I just looked at GNATS and found PR ports/120324. Any estimates when this might get committed? Thanks, Kelly Hays ___ freebsd-ports@freeb

Re: TrueCrypt 5.0 - Built, short test result: Ok.

Are you able to transfer let's say the content of /usr/local/bin to it? I'm still able to deadlock the whole vfs by doing something like that. Zitiere Olivier Cochard-Labbe vom Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:07:38PM +0100: > Hi all, > > > > Port at http://www.triplefork.net/truecrypt.tgz has updated ch