On Fri, Feb 8, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Gregory W. MacPherson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just finished spending much more time than I would like to building
> out various library and toolkit components to get Xorg working on my
> FreeBSD 6.3 STABLE box. Apparently the dependency tree looks something
Doug Barton wrote:
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
The idea is more along the lines of knowing how far you are away from
completing the whole build
... and I repeat my thesis that what you're really interested in is
how much time is left, not how many ports are left to build,
Doug Barton worte:
I'm going to respond to these from the portmaster perspective to try
and give some additional context. No criticism of portupgrade is
intended, since I've said many times that they are not completely
overlapping in feature sets.
Doug, I feel no resentment on criticism of port
Quoting "Aryeh M. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 14
Feb 2008 11:46:10 -0500):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How hard would it be to add the following to portupgrade-devel:
1. Progress report for -a builds (i.e. after and/or at the start of a
port build it says how m
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:46:08PM -0800 I heard the voice of
Doug Barton, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> ... and I repeat my thesis that what you're really interested in is
> how much time is left, not how many ports are left to build, and no
> tool is going to be able to tell you that.
No, but a to
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
And it
doesn't tell me anything unless I happen to be watching the terminal
at just the right time, and read quick before it scrolls off. I have
to wait 'till the end for any details that.
portupgrade {your stuff} |& tee /tmp/portupgrade.log # [1]
Now you can jus
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:30:17AM + I heard the voice of
Alex Zbyslaw, and lo! it spake thus:
> Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>
>> And it
>> doesn't tell me anything unless I happen to be watching the terminal
>> at just the right time, and read quick before it scrolls off. I have
>> to wait 'til
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:46:10 -0500
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> How hard would it be to add the following to portupgrade-devel:
>
> 1. Progress report for -a builds (i.e. after and/or at the start of a
> port build it says
I am pretty sure that I have compiled it with diablo previously but now I get:
configure: error: JDK is too old, you need at least 1.3
===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
I have diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_9 installed. Running up to date
prerelease with kernel from a couple of days ago,
On 2/15/08, eculp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_9 installed. Running up to date
> prerelease with kernel from a couple of days ago, haven't rebooted.
>
> FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE #305: Tue Feb 12 05:50:43 CST 2008
I think there isn't any diablo-jdk for 7.x branch...
Hello
I've been updating sysutils/nut from 2.2.0 to .1, and I've
hit some issues there.
First of all, bsd.port.mk sets WWWDIR for the actual port,
which is very nice of it. OTOH the CGI support is optional
in nut, which results in a conditional entry in pkg-plist.
the NUT_CGI plist variable is on
Hi,
today I discovered that the RC of obexftp now seems to work on freebsd.
I've been able to sync the phonebook and calendar of my SE K750i from
the telecom/* sources (which needs synch which in turn is the reason a
can not use obexapp).
This is a 'works for me' port. I've only been able to test
thanks, but could you pls give some more details howto create this profile ?
--- On Thu 02/14, Erich Dollansky < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Erich Dollansky [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:
Hi,
Piotr wrote:
thanks, but could you pls give some more details howto create this profile ?
I log on via a console as root and start X with KDE als the desktop.
All should be done then by KDE.
I can't remember if KDE asks then some questions or simply creates all
what is needed with de
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Gergely CZUCZY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've been updating sysutils/nut from 2.2.0 to .1, and I've
> hit some issues there.
>
> First of all, bsd.port.mk sets WWWDIR for the actual port,
> which is very nice of it. OTOH the CGI support is optional
> in
On Friday 15 February 2008 05:27:01 Jona Joachim wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:04:33 +0100, Danny Pansters wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 February 2008 20:45:43 Piotr wrote:
> >> if I try to start File Manager - Super User Mode, I put the root
> >> password and then I'm getting a lot of the following
16 matches
Mail list logo