$ inkscape
[Mon 4:16:03pm]
Duplicate large block deallocation of 0x86a1000
Duplicate large block deallocation
Emergency save activated!
then i must use pkill -9 inkscape to kill it
..
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.o
Hi!
Situation: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 i386 with all ports installed from cd or
"pkg_add -r ". Desktop KDE. Twinkle 1.0.4.
uname -a
FreeBSD klingon.vlex.com 7.0-RC1 FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #0: Mon Dec 24
12:18:24 UTC 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
pciconf -lv attached to this email (tx
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
please ignore
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi,
We have our product on RHEL(almost all versions), we are planning to support
it on *FreeBSD*.
We were successfull in building the binaries. Now we have to make a
setup(RPM sort of thing).
By visiting sites i cam to know that pkg_create will do it for me. But i am
unable to create a package as
All the info that you need is covered in the Porters Handbook
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/
Sevan / Venture37
_
Who's friends with who and co-starred in what?
http://www.searchgamesbox.com/celebri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
navneet Upadhyay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have our product on RHEL(almost all versions), we are planning to support
> it on *FreeBSD*.
> We were successfull in building the binaries. Now we have to make a
> setup(RPM sort of thing).
> By visiting site
2008/1/21, Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I still haven't rebuilt everything on my system, and have /usr/X11R6
> symlinked to /usr/local,
> so libchk generates a lot of false positives.
>
> maybe consider removing $x11base from the script on «6.2 systems?
>
Or just remove $x11base e
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 01:23:20PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> navneet Upadhyay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have our product on RHEL(almost all versions), we are planning to support
> > it on *FreeBSD*.
> > We were successfull in building
Hello,
If I do "make package-recursive" on a port then it first tries to install the
port. This causes it to fail if the port is already installed. However, if I
deinstall the port, and then make package-recursive, it installs the port,
makes the port package, and (this is the important part) quit
Does anyone know of any work done to create KDE4 ports?
With the recent release of a technology preview of Amarok2 I'd like to
make an amarok-devel port to test it.
--
Jeremy Faulkner
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
On Jan 20, 2008 3:25 PM, Frank J. Laszlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could donate more/better machines to do the package builds. :) It
> takes a long time to build packages for over 20K ports. Packaging also
> depends on licensing, some things are not allowed to be distributed as
> binary pack
On Monday 21 January 2008 17:59:25 Jeremy Faulkner wrote:
> Does anyone know of any work done to create KDE4 ports?
>
> With the recent release of a technology preview of Amarok2 I'd like to
> make an amarok-devel port to test it.
Work has just started on the ports (just a day or so ago), and it w
On Jan 20, 2008 4:24 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Packages are built continuously and as fast as possible. Which package
> sets do you feel are being updated too slowly?
>
> Kris
>
Kris,
I am just curious how it works.
Was concern about packages with security updates mostly;
may
Pryvet Stat,
I tweaked the FreeBSD ports/security/pam_af/Makefile a little.
Since bsd.port.mk has:
.if ${PREFIX} == /usr
MANPREFIX?= /usr/share
.else
MANPREFIX?= ${PREFIX}
.endif
...then this patch allow installing and uninstalling with PREFIX=/usr
correctly:
- ${INSTALL_MAN} $
Tim Clewlow wrote:
Hello,
If I do "make package-recursive" on a port then it first tries to install the
port. This causes it to fail if the port is already installed. However, if I
deinstall the port, and then make package-recursive, it installs the port,
makes the port package, and (this is the
P Bielecki wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008 4:24 PM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Packages are built continuously and as fast as possible. Which package
sets do you feel are being updated too slowly?
Kris
Kris,
I am just curious how it works.
Was concern about packages with security updat
--- Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Clewlow wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > If I do "make package-recursive" on a port then it first tries to install
the
> > port. This causes it to fail if the port is already installed. However, if
I
> > deinstall the port, and then make package-recursiv
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I still don't understand what you claim is the problem :) We do not
specially update packages like perl; rather, *every* package is
frequently rebuilt and updated.
If I understood the question correctly, I think the OP is asking about
the frequency of rebuilding package
On Jan 22, 2008 12:23 AM, P Bielecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 21, 2008 11:57 PM, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > > I still don't understand what you claim is the problem :) We do not
> > > specially update packages like perl; rather, *every* pac
Hello again,
[to recap: drscheme, (which is an IDE that runs under the "mred"
runtime, built from ports/lang/drscheme (or actually manually
from a personal copy of that Makefile that builds the current
release: 372, rather than ver 370 in ports)) worked beautifully
on my system until I updated to
В Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:35:15 -0800 (PST)
Tim Clewlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> пишет:
>
> > AFAIK, no. You could try 'pkg_create -b' for the parent port, and
> > then try 'make package-recursive' to see if that will bypass the
> > first step, but I can't guarantee that it will work. Your other
> > optio
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:57:31PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> If I understood the question correctly, I think the OP is asking about
> the frequency of rebuilding packages with security updates. In which
> case your answer is still correct, but leads to a new question, which is
> would it be po
P Bielecki wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008 12:23 AM, P Bielecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 11:57 PM, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I still don't understand what you claim is the problem :) We do not
specially update packages like perl; rather, *every* pac
Congratulations, ernesto! Your phone link is now active:
http://www.jaxtr.com/lluvias
What's next?
1. Link your phones to your account: http://www.jaxtr.com/user/settings.jsp
2. Post your jaxtr widget to hear from your online friends:
http://www.jaxtr.com/user/mycallbox.jsp
3. Invit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark Linimon wrote:
> Writing a package build cluster that keeps a rolling model of the INDEX
> metadata as every commit comes in, so it would know what dependencies need
> to be rebuilt, is left as an exercise for the reader.
Um... yes? ports-mg
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:35:15 -0800 (PST) Tim Clewlow wrote:
> Its for a package server, ie slurp daily CVS updates and make
> new versions of packages available for clients to install.
You may consider using ports-mgmt/tinderbox for package building.
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engi
27 matches
Mail list logo
