What is the difference between x11/gtk-theme-switch and
x11/gtk-theme-switch2 ? diff doesn't report any :-)
I expected that '2' port would have 'Gtk theme switch 2.0 Beta for Gtk+
2.0' from http://www.muhri.net/nav.php3?node=gts
I was very puzzled to see the exact replica of the other port.
--
* Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-27 14:45:18]:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 13:25:34 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote
>
> > What is the difference between x11/gtk-theme-switch and
> > x11/gtk-theme-switch2 ? diff doesn't report any :-)
> >
> > I expected that '2' port would have 'Gtk theme switch
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 13:25:34 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote
> What is the difference between x11/gtk-theme-switch and
> x11/gtk-theme-switch2 ? diff doesn't report any :-)
>
> I expected that '2' port would have 'Gtk theme switch 2.0 Beta for Gtk+
> 2.0' from http://www.muhri.net/nav.php3?node=gts
> I
There is a Windows open source program I would like to port to FreeBSD.
It seems to compile OK, using gcc, but chokes on MS/Windows only type
data types like 'ulong'. What would be the easiest way to fix/convert
these, or must it be done manually?
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Belics wrote:
> There is a Windows open source program I would like to port to
> FreeBSD. It seems to compile OK, using gcc, but chokes on
> MS/Windows only type data types like 'ulong'. What would be the
> easiest way to fix/convert these, or mu
* Rob Belics ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> There is a Windows open source program I would like to port to FreeBSD. It
> seems to compile OK, using gcc, but chokes on MS/Windows only type data
> types like 'ulong'. What would be the easiest way to fix/convert these, or
> must it be done manually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Rob Belics ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> There is a Windows open source program I would like to port to
>> FreeBSD. It seems to compile OK, using gcc, but chokes on
>> MS/Windows only type data types like 'ulong'. What wou
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Belics wrote:
There is a Windows open source program I would like to port to
FreeBSD. It seems to compile OK, using gcc, but chokes on
MS/Windows only type data types like 'ulong'. What would be the
easiest way to f
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Belics wrote:
There is a Windows open source program I would like to port to
FreeBSD. It seems to compile OK, using gcc, but chokes on
MS/Windows only type data types like 'ulong'. What would be the
easiest way to fix/
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 18:40 -0500, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 12:27:15PM -0600, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 15:09 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 13:28 -0600, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
> > > > ===> Extracting for evolution-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Umar wrote:
Dear Stefan!
Thanks for your reply!
touch /var/db/pkg/squid-/+IGNOREME.
I already done that. But its not working,
Wesley is correct that he's brought this to my attention already, and also
correct that
Looking here at:
http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/configmain.html#cfg_dir
It shows that if you had been using cgi_dir for several subdirectories,
there would be several cfgs getting loaded into Nagios during the
startup.
Even it would pass the nagios -v with flying colors.
In my situation
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:57:47AM -0600, Rob Belics wrote:
>There is a Windows open source program I would like to port to FreeBSD. It
>seems to compile OK, using gcc, but chokes on MS/Windows only type data
>types like 'ulong'. What would be the easiest way to fix/convert these, or
>must it
13 matches
Mail list logo
