Please update x11-toolkits/fltk from 1.1.7 to current version

There's bug affect compiling remotely/in console: Fluid needs X connection to compile Fl_Help_View widgets(http://www.fltk.org/str.php?L1318) Which already fixed in current version 1.1.x-r5989. The version in ports tree is 1.1.7, I wish it could be updated while it affecting a new port's compiling

FreeBSD Port: libfpx-1.2.0.12_1

Hi there! I am sorry to tell you, but i think this link doesnt work :( http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/fpx.mega-patch.2007-11-01.bz2 Regards, Eleni ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubs

libgphoto2-2.4.0 - PTPBUG_DELETE_SENDS_EVENT caused hang for Canon IXUS 55 and S3 IS

Recently I noticed that attempting to delete gphotos from my Canon IXUS 55 in gtkam would just hang. After some experimentation, combined with looking at older sources (which did not hang), I tracked the behaviour down to the PTPBUG_DELETE_SENDS_EVENT flags in libgphoto2. I purchased a Canon S

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed > > up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more > > useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts fil

Re: libgphoto2-2.4.0 - PTPBUG_DELETE_SENDS_EVENT caused hang for Canon IXUS 55 and S3 IS

Mark Kirkwood píše v po 26. 11. 2007 v 09:21 +1300: > Recently I noticed that attempting to delete gphotos from my Canon IXUS > 55 in gtkam would just hang. After some experimentation, combined with > looking at older sources (which did not hang), I tracked the behaviour > down to the PTPBUG_DE

Re: ports modifying system setups

Gergely CZUCZY wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 11:43:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: Gergely CZUCZY wrote: echo 'sevice_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local Yes, I think we all know how to go about this manually. The question at hand is whether or not it's possible or desirable to create the pos

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

RW wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:00:59 -0800 > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file >> with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? I think >> that would greatly increase the utility of the tarball, since you >> coul

[HEADSUP] new package status/statistics uploaded to portsmon.freebsd.org

I've been generating these locally but not uploading them. Now, they are up-to-date. If you are interested in what the state of the packages is on the various architectures, these pages will be of interest. Of particular interest to ports committers is the new page http://portsmon.freebsd.org/ch

Re: X Can't "see" my docked monitor - xorg or nvidia?

Doug, Did you ever get this working? I have a simular problem and the workaround I found is to use the "nvidia-driver-96xx" port instead of the regular "nvidia-driver" port. I can not remember the exact model of the Dell FP display that I have ( it is at work) but it is the same resolution (1600x12

Re: X Can't "see" my docked monitor - xorg or nvidia?

Kelly Hays wrote: > Doug, > Did you ever get this working? I have a simular problem and the > workaround I found is to use the "nvidia-driver-96xx" port instead of > the regular "nvidia-driver" port. I can not remember the exact model > of the Dell FP display that I have ( it is at work) but it is

Re: Package Building in the Large

Doug Barton wrote: Jason C. Wells wrote: Doug Barton wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote: What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a build host and then use pkg_add on various machines. I ha

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: >> Doug Barton wrote: >>> In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed >>> up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more >>> useful. How hard would it be to include

Re: Package Building in the Large

Chuck Robey wrote: Doug Barton wrote: Jason C. Wells wrote: Doug Barton wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote: What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a build host and then use pkg_add on var

Re: Package Building in the Large

Doug Barton wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote: What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a build host and then use pkg_add on various machines. I have had a variety of difficulties with all

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 06:26:09PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: > >> Doug Barton wrote: > >>> In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed > >>> up version of the ports tree, I had an ide

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 06:26:09PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >> Edwin Groothuis wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:39:19AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: Doug Barton wrote: > In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed > up version of th

Submitting a new port if send-pr is broken

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Due to a ISP firewall it is not possible for me to send/recv mail how do I submit a new port since send-pr requires email? - -- Aryeh M. Friedman Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: G

Re: Submitting a new port if send-pr is broken

On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:19:59AM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > Due to a ISP firewall it is not possible for me to send/recv mail how > do I submit a new port since send-pr requires email? If your ISP filters outbound TCP port 25, then it means they're probably doing so to stop/curb spam or t

RE: Submitting a new port if send-pr is broken

Hi Aryeh! > Due to a ISP firewall it is not possible for me to send/recv mail how > do I submit a new port since send-pr requires email? If you have a web browser, you can submit it via FreeBSD's website: http://www.freebsd.org/support/bugreports.html The link is "Submit a Problem Report". Chr

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

Edwin Groothuis wrote: >>> That would save me 42Mb to download each time :-P > > Oh wait. The cvsup checkouts file is probably a small (set of) > file(s) with some revision information, while the portsnap file is > a huge chunk of data with a copy of the ports tree. Well, even better: instead of

RE: Submitting a new port if send-pr is broken

On Mon, November 26, 2007 7:01 am, Chris Haulmark wrote: > Hi Aryeh! >> Due to a ISP firewall it is not possible for me to send/recv mail how >> do I submit a new port since send-pr requires email? > > If you have a web browser, you can submit it via FreeBSD's website: > > http://www.freebsd.org/s