Re: net-mgmt/bsd-airtools broken not because of gcc4

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:22:41PM +0300, Denis Barov wrote: > On Thu Nov 08, 2007 at 18:50:10 +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > > Denis Barov wrote: > > >> Hi all! > > >> I found, that port net-mgmt/bsd-airtools marked as broke

Re: net-mgmt/bsd-airtools broken not because of gcc4

On Thu Nov 08, 2007 at 18:50:10 +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > Denis Barov wrote: > >> Hi all! > >> I found, that port net-mgmt/bsd-airtools marked as broken: > >> BROKEN= Does not compile with GCC 4.2 > >> but, it's n

Korganizer with an "imap ressource" calendar

I use Korganizer with an "imap ressource" calendar. It worked fine with 3.5.7, but the latest upgrade to 3.5.8 broke it. The calendar and kontacts are blank (no date, nothing), and trying to add an event raises an error : No writable resource was found, saving will not be possible. Reconfigure KM

Re: net-mgmt/bsd-airtools broken not because of gcc4

On Thu Nov 08, 2007 at 22:35:31 +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:22:41PM +0300, Denis Barov wrote: > > On Thu Nov 08, 2007 at 18:50:10 +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > > > Denis Barov wrote: > > > >>

-pthread ldflag doesn't links against any libs

Hello, I've got a wierd issue here and I'd like to ask for some suggestion. First of all I've noticed that pcsc-lite (libpcsclite.so) is using pthreads but isn't linked against any threading libs. I've started digging around the source, and it really wasn't linked against it, nor mentioned in the

Re: net-mgmt/bsd-airtools broken not because of gcc4

Andrew Thompson wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:22:41PM +0300, Denis Barov wrote: On Thu Nov 08, 2007 at 18:50:10 +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Denis Barov wrote: Hi all! I found, that port net-mgmt/b

Re: -pthread ldflag doesn't links against any libs

Gergely CZUCZY wrote: Hello, I've got a wierd issue here and I'd like to ask for some suggestion. First of all I've noticed that pcsc-lite (libpcsclite.so) is using pthreads but isn't linked against any threading libs. I've started digging around the source, and it really wasn't linked against

Re: Stunnel not working

RW píše v čt 08. 11. 2007 v 22:06 +: > Stunnel doesn't seem to be working correctly on my 6.2 desktop, I'm > getting the following in /var/log/messages, and I have no stunnel > process > > > stunnel: LOG5[926:134660096]: stunnel 4.21 on i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 with > OpenSSL 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oc

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0900 > From: "Thomas Zander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 07/11/2007, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 'acodec=aac' worked in the version now in ports, although that version > > failed to write the header with a floating point error. :-( > > Does thi

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 22:42:57 -0800 > From: "Kevin Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Nov 7, 2007 10:02 PM, Kevin Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 7, 2007 8:25 PM, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0900 > > > > From: "Thomas Zander"

Re: request: Port of 'miro' player

Just installed it. Seems to work. Thanks again. sam On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:45:33 +0100, Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have uploaded the latest version of this port at but it still segfaults on my test machine...

Stunnel not working

Stunnel doesn't seem to be working correctly on my 6.2 desktop, I'm getting the following in /var/log/messages, and I have no stunnel process stunnel: LOG5[926:134660096]: stunnel 4.21 on i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 with OpenSSL 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oct 2004 stunnel: LOG5[926:134660096]: Threading:PTHREAD

Re: Packaging issue

On Thursday 08 November 2007, javier prats said: > Good day everyone, > > I'm having an odd problem getting a port to package properly. When > running `port test` on the program it goes through the installation > process as expected ending with "registering installation". When > `port` attempts t

Packaging issue

Good day everyone, I'm having an odd problem getting a port to package properly. When running `port test` on the program it goes through the installation process as expected ending with "registering installation". When `port` attempts to create a package i recieve many lines of errors. Belo

Re: Please test: mplayer 1.0 rc2

> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 22:42:57 -0800 > From: "Kevin Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Nov 7, 2007 10:02 PM, Kevin Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 7, 2007 8:25 PM, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:12:49 +0900 > > > > From: "Thomas Zander"

can't find 'PyEval_InitThreads'?

Robert Huff writes: In trying to rebuild openoffice.org-2 after the recent Gnome change, I run into this: dmake: Executing shell macro: $(MAKEDEPEND) @$(mktmp -f - -p$(SLO) $(MKDEPFLAGS) $(CDEFS) $(CDEFSSLO) $(CDEFSMT) $i ) >> $@ dmake: Executing shell macro: $(MAKEDEPEND) @$(mktmp -f -

Re: Stunnel not working

On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:59:15 +0100 Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On my machines, I noticed 4.21 no longer understands domain names in > connect statement of configuration file. > > Try replacing that secure.new.easynews.com by it's IP. Thanks, but it didn't work. _

qmail-scanner - Makefile - QS_NOTIFY not handled correctly?

Hi, while trying to configure qmail-scanner, I ran across a few problems. I'm a newbie for FreeBSD so I'd like to ask a few questions before filing PRs etc :-) So here we go: There is an option QS_NOTIFY in the Makefile which is handled ".if !defined(..." however, the case when it *is* defined is

ports/117652

This seems to have been slightly over looked a bit over a week and I was just wondering if it would be possible of poking some one to get the needed update for it committed. I am sort of anxious to get this updated as it is a bug fix that I've been meaning to do for awhile but have been to busy to

Re: ports/117652

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zane C.B. wrote: > This seems to have been slightly over looked a bit over a week and > I was just wondering if it would be possible of poking some one to > get the needed update for it committed. > > I am sort of anxious to get this updated as it is

Re: ports/117652

On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:20:51 -0800 Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Zane C.B. wrote: > > This seems to have been slightly over looked a bit over a week and > > I was just wondering if it would be possible of poking some one to > > get the nee