Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon) writes:
>> Second, the port version I wrote is anachronic, since some people may
>> have 1.46 installed (or prior 1.45.5 version, but PORT_REVISION can be
>> used here so this is not an issue). What's the correct way (or least
>> annoyance way) to handle this backt
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:44:13AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:21:54AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>>>
Errr... maybe I should actually take a careful look at portmaster fir
Hi,
I'm trying to build benchmarks/iperf inside a 7.0 guest with chroot
(the host is a 6-STABLE) but it fails with:
===> Cleaning for iperf-2.0.2_1
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> Extracting for iperf-2.0.2_1
=> MD5 Checksum OK for iperf-2.0.2.tar.gz.
=> SHA256 Check
Uwe Grohnwaldt wrote:
Am Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:53:33 +0100
schrieb Per olof Ljungmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Yes, that worked for him -- that's how Per built the software. But
using the
``-j'' breaks (even with -j1).
Just to con
I don't get an error to be honest.
I maintain both games/ftjava and games/sfbol and when I run them they
simply don't work. A window pops up for a second or so and then closes.
If I add -verbose to the wrappers I see no errors either. They
worked fine on 6.x though. I can troubleshoot them m
Peter Thoenen wrote:
> I don't get an error to be honest.
>
> I maintain both games/ftjava and games/sfbol and when I run them they
> simply don't work. A window pops up for a second or so and then closes.
>If I add -verbose to the wrappers I see no errors either. They
> worked fine on 6.x t
After a 'portupgrade -f fusefs-kmod' (to make sure the port is installed
correctly), I have created a package that now fails.
# pkg_create -b fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1
# pkg_delete -f fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1
pkg_delete: package 'fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1' is required by these other
packages
and may n
Hi,
on my i386 CURRENT box from 20071105, I noticed that xfce4-netload-plugin
0.4.0_3 does
not update its statistics after xfce has started up, i.e. the traffic is always
0 kB/s.
Both the tooltip text and the bars behave like this. Moving the mouse over the
icon to
refresh the tooltip text
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Sorry for the late reply ...
On Fri, 26.10.2007 at 20:16:45 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
All right, here I am. nss_ldap.conf and ldap.conf are located in
/usr/local/etc and are identical (link). I copied all tags I use and deleted
commented out tags:
Seems ok to
I know that we have a ports freeze but FF 2.0.0.8 have some very serious
rendering bugs affecting most modern page layouts so it is not suitable
to ship with any release.
/Martin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Nilsson wrote:
> I know that we have a ports freeze but FF 2.0.0.8 have some very serious
> rendering bugs affecting most modern page layouts so it is not suitable
> to ship with any release.
Yes, I think the change is trivial. Here is a patch
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 03:22:35PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Martin Nilsson wrote:
> > I know that we have a ports freeze but FF 2.0.0.8 have some very serious
> > rendering bugs affecting most modern page layouts so it is not suitable
> > to ship with any release.
>
> Yes, I think the change is triv
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:10:53 +1100
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm trying to install filezilla. It built fine under 6.2, but under 7 i can't
> build one of its requirements ( x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 ). The last lines of this
> ports builds are below, in particular :
Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:02:38 -0500, Josh Paetzel wrote:
>> On Thursday 01 November 2007 04:04:35 pm lemon wrote:
>>> [0] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-
> January/019352.html
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2006-
> March/03069
$uname -a
FreeBSD www.525183.com 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #8: Tue Sep 18 23:01:05 CST
2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386
PORTNAME= zhcon
PORTVERSION=0.2.5
PORTREVISION= 1
It caused segmentation fault while trying to run it. In my box it
works if I cha
16 matches
Mail list logo
