Hi
when you will update dc deamon to version 1.1.1 ?? :(
Cordialement,
Dimitri NAUMOVICH
+38(0)6 65 16 71 00
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^ ^
X @
, ,
-_-
PGP.sig
Description: Ceci est une signature électronique PGP
Just tried to install phpmyadmin, stopped in port php5-zlib.
Tried to install php-zlib for its own, same result -===> Building for
php5-zlib-5.2.4_1
/bin/sh /usr/ports/archivers/php5-zlib/work/php-5.2.4/ext/zlib/libtool
--mode=compile cc -I.
-I/usr/ports/archivers/php5-zlib/work/php-5.2.4/ext/z
I am the maintainer of lang/g95. The source tarball for this
software changes almost daily. I need to put a snapshot tarball
up to support the lang/g95 port. I will also need to make
available the gcc-core-4.0.3.tar.gz tarball as the lang/gcc40 port
has been removed, evidently. Specifically,
Hi,
I want to give a new breath to the port lang/tuareg-mode.el. I has
been deleted becuase of the following issues:
1. broken use of the emacs variable
2. a new version (1.46) existed for a few monthes, but the software
author changed his mind and decided to remvove 1.46 from
distr
Hello,
Le Dim 4 nov 07 à 17:11:35 +0100, M. L. Dodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
>
> I am the maintainer of lang/g95. The source tarball for this
> software changes almost daily. I need to put a snapshot tarball
> up to support the lang/g95 port. I will also need to make
> available the
Hi list,
in these days I'm doing my best as fixing ports marked as broken with
gcc 4.2
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?originator=pietro+cerutti).
I would like to know if there is any way to somehow prioritize my work,
e.g. by the number of users who are using a broken port.
Is t
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 12:45:34PM +0100, Michaël Grünewald wrote:
> First, this is not really a new port, but a revival of a dead one. is
> there specific issues with this?
No, just label it [new port], but put in the Description that it's
coming back from the Attic.
> Second, the port version I
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 03:08:45PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
>> Is there anything like bsdstats that I can use to see that?
>
> FreshPorts has http://www.freshports.org/graphs.php?id=7, but
> it's only the top 20, so not really.
>
yep... and none of them has problems ;-)
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 03:08:45PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> Is there anything like bsdstats that I can use to see that?
FreshPorts has http://www.freshports.org/graphs.php?id=7, but
it's only the top 20, so not really.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebs
Sorry for the late reply ...
On Fri, 26.10.2007 at 20:16:45 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> All right, here I am. nss_ldap.conf and ldap.conf are located in
> /usr/local/etc and are identical (link). I copied all tags I use and deleted
> commented out tags:
Seems ok to me, though I don't claim to b
On Sunday 04 November 2007, Pietro Cerutti said:
> Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 03:08:45PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> >> Is there anything like bsdstats that I can use to see that?
> >
> > FreshPorts has http://www.freshports.org/graphs.php?id=7, but
> > it's only the top 20,
Second, the port version I wrote is anachronic, since some people may
have 1.46 installed (or prior 1.45.5 version, but PORT_REVISION can be
used here so this is not an issue). What's the correct way (or least
annoyance way) to handle this backtime travel?
See PORTEPOCH
Also, PORT_REVISION is PO
hi everyone,
I'm trying to install OpenOffice 2.3 under 7.0-BETA2. It built fine under 6.2
The full error I get is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mon Nov 5 08:09:34 2007]
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2
$ sudo make -DWITH_DEBUG=2 -DWITH_SYSTEM_FREETYPE -DWITH_CUPS -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA
package
[]
/
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to install filezilla. It built fine under 6.2, but under 7 i can't
build one of its requirements ( x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 ). The last lines of this
ports builds are below, in particular :
/usr/local/lib/compat/libpthread.so.2: undefined reference to `__malloc_lock'
(the las
Hi List,
Might somebody please explain to me why apache-2.2.6 is not install from
/usr/ports ? I am attempting to complile with mod_ldap and a bunch of
modules - nothing that should be causing a fuss, though.
Help please,
Noah
# uname -a
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #1:
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:22:40 -0800
Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Might somebody please explain to me why apache-2.2.6 is not install from
> /usr/ports ? I am attempting to complile with mod_ldap and a bunch of
> modules - nothing that should be causing a fuss, though.
Noah,
We need more in
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:22:40 -0800 Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Might somebody please explain to me why apache-2.2.6 is not install
from /usr/ports ? I am attempting to complile with mod_ldap and a
bunch of modules - nothing that should be causing a fuss, though.
Hi,
Cacti is now for some time in the 0.8.7 version, wich has lots of improvments
against the cacti-0.8.6j.3_2 wich is the latest version it the ports system.
Any information on when will the port version will be upgraded to latest 0.8.7?
--
Kind regards, Marko Kobal.
__
18 matches
Mail list logo
