[1][logo.gif] [2][banner.gif]
[3]WELCOME TO GOGOEC.COM
This is your best opportunity
to directly access the
Chinese electronics
market !
[4][tittle_about%20us.gif]
[5]GOGOEC is a HONG KONG trading and wholesale company based in
Shenzhe
To check myself I updated ports again and run portupgrade -NR
net/asterisk-addons - same error.
tracy musaza пишет:
Can U update ports tree then reinstall asterisk? I see there is some
probl with some dependancies: asterisk-addons
cheers!!
*/"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* a écr
Hello, all!
this is a unsupportet structure code:
==
.if !defined(WITH_SERVER)
PLIST_SUB+= SERVER="@comment "
.if defined(WITH_MYSQL) || !defined(WITHOUT_PGSQL) ||
!defined(WITHOUT_SQLITE) || !defined(WITHO
I'm getting failures when trying to upgrade OpenEXR.
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libHalf.so.4, needed by /usr/local/lib/libIlmImf.so,
may conflict with libHalf.so.6
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libIex.so.4, needed by /usr/local/lib/libIlmImf.so,
may conflict with libIex.so.6
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libIlmThre
Paul Schmehl writes:
> I'm getting failures when trying to upgrade OpenEXR.
/usr/ports/UPDATING
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I'm getting failures when trying to upgrade OpenEXR.
>
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libHalf.so.4, needed by
> /usr/local/lib/libIlmImf.so, may conflict with libHalf.so.6
> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libIex.so.4, needed by
> /usr/local/lib/libIlmImf.so, may conflict with libIex.so.6
> /
On 10/18/07, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Schmehl wrote:
> > I'm getting failures when trying to upgrade OpenEXR.
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libHalf.so.4, needed by
> > /usr/local/lib/libIlmImf.so, may conflict with libHalf.so.6
> > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libIex.so.4, needed by
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:02:31 -0500
Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|Would it work to delete the old libs and then symlink from the newer
|ones?
Please read ports/UPDATING
- Martin
--
Martin Wilke| irc.unixfreunde.de #bsd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD
--On Thursday, October 18, 2007 13:11:44 -0400 Robert Huff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Schmehl writes:
I'm getting failures when trying to upgrade OpenEXR.
/usr/ports/UPDATING
BTDT.
Took a make distclean, then make install, to solve the problem.
--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROT
> > There was a report on -current a while ago that a preliminary patch
> > to fix the non-threadsafeness of mmap(2) MAP_FIXED also makes flash9 work,
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-August/075968.html
I wrote that and I was wrong... it doesnt seem to fix the f
[adding -emulation to Cc, just in case...]
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:40:55PM +0200, I wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >Quoting John Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:10:11 -0700):
> >
> >>
> >> [ On Monday, October 8, Scot Hetzel wrote: ]
> >> > The port is no
On 10/18/07, Roman Divacky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There was a report on -current a while ago that a preliminary patch
> > > to fix the non-threadsafeness of mmap(2) MAP_FIXED also makes flash9 work,
> > >
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-August/075968.htm
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:51:44PM +0200, I wrote:
> > There was a report on -current a while ago that a preliminary patch
> > to fix the non-threadsafeness of mmap(2) MAP_FIXED also makes flash9 work,
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-August/075968.html
> > a fi
With most modern systems having 2+ cores, I was wondering if the ports
system could make use of more than one of them. I briefly searched the
web and list archives and found several short discussions and the
following page (cced author markus@):
http://www.brueffer.de/parallel_ports_build.html
Th
14 matches
Mail list logo
