Oh, the kernel module IS loaded as shown in 'dmesg -a' and in
/var/log/messages. However, it can't be loaded unless / and /usr file
systems are mounted. That's what I meant in my post when I said "the first
error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet loaded", since the
mounting comes f
On 2007-Oct-06 21:20:24 +0300, Diomidis Spinellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I can give you quantitative data on the benefits of shared objects. On a
>web server running FreeBSD 6.2 I found 98 shared objects sharing 16,790,901
>bytes of memory through 1,002 mappings.
>Without shared libraries t
On 10/7/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Lars Stokholm wrote:
> > On 10/5/07, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 10/5/07, Lars Stokholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Running 'portmaster --clean-distfiles-all' it began to delete *a lot*
> >>> of files i
On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
> On 10/7/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
> > > The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet
> >
> > loaded.
> >
> > Well isn't it sort of pointless to proceed until you get
Message: 20
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 03:05:09 +0200
From: Mathias Picker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: x11/ati-driver
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Am Sonntag, den 07.10.2007, 00:54 + schrieb mr. phreak:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to make
* Jeremy Messenger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> How do you deal with the security? It will be required for all ports that
> depend on a port to be rebuild, so bump the PORTREVISION will be need. But
> what about for non-static that don't need to be bump? A solution for that
> might be need too.
On 10/7/07, Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
>
> > On 10/7/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
> > > > The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet
> > >
> > > loaded.
> > >
>
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Lars Stokholm wrote:
On 10/7/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm sincerely sorry that you've had this problem. I think Scot is right in
that the code for --clean-distfiles* is pretty simple, and relies totally
on a proper definition of DISTDIR.
Perhaps at the ti
Hi List,
the app-notify tool is broken with ASterisk 1.4 there is a 2.0rc1 out
that works and compiles without any issues.
As the app-ldap tool is also at 2.0rc1 would it be an idea to update
this port?
Maintainer copied in, Mayo, should you want the diff's against the
working 2.0rc1 give me a s
Hi Steve,
I've started working on porting a version (it was pre-2.0rc1 though)
of app-notify to Asterisk 1.4, but got side tracked with changing
jobs and such. If you have the diffs handy they would be much
appreciated, otherwise I'll do another port soon now that my time is
clearing up a
Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet
> > Well, I gave up using /etc/fstab to mount NTFS partitions at boot time a
> > couple of months ago when I realized that it's not the correct way to do it
> > (so I also wrote an rc.d script to do the job, but I'll talk about it
> > later). However, I recently looked at fusefs-ntfs source files,
On 10/7/07, Craig Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Novembre wrote:
> > On 10/7/07, Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 10/7/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
