On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:27:34 David Southwell wrote:
> # Portupgrade -a
> Error message:
>
> ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24:
> is marked as broken: Does not build on 64-bit architectures
>
> Will this be fixed?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> David
As there has been
Richard Secor wrote:
Do you happen to know if this is supposed to work with vpopmail 5.4.17?
Because I'm having problems building it.
That combination works fine for me (now using courier-authlib-vchkpw-0.60).
Ed
courier-authlib-base
and
courier-authlib-mysql
both built without a problem.
Richard Secor wrote:
>
> Do you happen to know if this is supposed to work with vpopmail 5.4.17?
> Because I'm having problems building it.
> courier-authlib-base
> and
> courier-authlib-mysql
> both built without a problem.
When did you last cvsuped your portstree? There was an error with
-vchk
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:25:36AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:27:34 David Southwell wrote:
> > # Portupgrade -a
> > Error message:
> >
> > ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24:
> > is marked as broken: Does not build on 64-bit architectur
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward to me:
- Introduce STATIC_BUILD variable that changes usual build behavior
- Proce
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:03:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
> help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
> sometimes.
What I'd like to see first is some quantitative research on the
benefits o
Hello,
I know, I probably should be asking the maintainers about this but I
wanted to get a feel for whether or not other people were experiencing
the same issues as I am.
Currently I'm on dialup (:(...), so there's a large degree of lag
between when I can get distfiles from school and
On Sunday 30 September 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
> Despite the fact that this was tested on the cluster, this upgrade has
> failed. Please hold off upgrading your ports tree until we can figure
> out what the problem is. Thanks.
Did I miss the "all good now", or is this still the latest on the s
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> On Sunday 30 September 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > Despite the fact that this was tested on the cluster, this upgrade has
> > failed. Please hold off upgrading your ports tree until we can figure
> > out what the problem is. Thanks.
>
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
gsynaptics-0.9.9_5: "/a/erwin/tindex/ports/x11-servers/synaptics" non-existent
-- dependency list incomplete
===> x11/gsynaptics failed
*** Error code 1
*** Error code 1
S
quire 515,107,268 bytes - 50 times more.
These are not just memory savings, but, more importantly on a modern
system, they contribute to improved locality in the code cache.
I've put the Perl script I used for obtaining these figures at
http://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20071006/
Diomidis Spine
ut, more importantly on a modern
> system, they contribute to improved locality in the code cache.
>
> I've put the Perl script I used for obtaining these figures at
> http://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20071006/
Cool :) Here's what I get on our hosting server (lots of PHP
Fas
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi,
After the migration of the autoconf to 2.61, the libpano12 is broken. The
compilation gives the following error:
===> Extracting for libpano12-2.8.4_2
=> MD5 Checksum OK for libpano12-2.8.4.tar.gz.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for libpano12-2.8.4.tar.gz.
===> Patching for libpano12-2.8.4_2
===> A
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward to me:
- Introduce STAT
Hi,
The ongoing problem with mounting my NTFS partition at boot time still
remains. I have upgraded ntfs-3g to the latest version from ports:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ pkg_info | grep fuse
fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1 Kernel module for fuse
fusefs-libs-2.7.0_1 FUSE allows filesystem implementation
Hi all,
today I wanted to upgrade my quagga ports in 4 diffrent systems and the
upgrading process has failed with these messages below for all 4 systems the
same:
quagga-0.99.9 < needs updating (port has 0.99.9_2)
...
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/net/quagga/work/qua
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward
Hi!
I'm trying to make the ati-fglrx driver work under freebsd-6.2 -
RELEASE. I've had no success. After installing from ports I simply get
'can't find "fglrx" ' from Xorg.0.log.
Is there anyone out there with a successful install of this driver? Or
perhaps another sollution for making tv-o
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi!
> >>
> >>I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
> >>help produce packages withou
mr. phreak wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to make the ati-fglrx driver work under freebsd-6.2 -
RELEASE. I've had no success. After installing from ports I simply get
'can't find "fglrx" ' from Xorg.0.log.
Is there anyone out there with a successful install of this driver?
Or perhaps another sollut
Gary Kline wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce pack
Am Sonntag, den 07.10.2007, 00:54 + schrieb mr. phreak:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to make the ati-fglrx driver work under freebsd-6.2 -
> RELEASE. I've had no success. After installing from ports I simply get
> 'can't find "fglrx" ' from Xorg.0.log.
Where did you get your "fglrx" driver? As far
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 06:18:08PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Gary Kline wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >
> >>Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
Hello,
Please note that thanks to last tuesdays commit on bsd.port.mk we
now have the INSTALL_KLD command. This command is a replacement for
the INSTALL_PROGRAM command for kernel loadable modules. The reason
for this split is that on AMD64 platforms the module will break if
it gets strip(1)ped. T
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Lars Stokholm wrote:
On 10/5/07, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/5/07, Lars Stokholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Running 'portmaster --clean-distfiles-all' it began to delete *a lot*
of files it shouldn't. I haven't had time to see how much is missing,
but I gue
Hi,
The ongoing problem with mounting my NTFS partition at boot time still
remains. I have upgraded ntfs-3g to the latest version from ports:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ pkg_info | grep fuse
fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1 Kernel module for fuse
fusefs-libs-2.7.0_1 FUSE allows filesystem implementation
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet loaded.
Well isn't it sort of pointless to proceed until you get the kernel module
loaded at boot time and then see what happens next?
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
28 matches
Mail list logo
