sunbird - Mark as broken with gcc4.2.

Hello, Why is sunbird marked as broken with gcc 4.2? I have working sunbird-0.5,1 installed on 28.Sept.2007 running on FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #4: Mon Oct 1 11:17:32 EEST 2007 i386 compiled with : Using built-in specs. Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compile

sunbird marked as broken with gcc4.2

Hi again, I removed the BROKEN line from the port and compiled sunbird without problems. /var/db/ports/sunbird/options: WITHOUT_DEBUG=true WITHOUT_LOGGING=true WITHOUT_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=true May be because I do not use OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS? I'll check and this :) -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev

FreeBSD Port: fga-1.3.4

Hello, I just wanted you to know that FGA version 1.4 is out. The main reason why the port should be updated is that the license was changed to a less restrictive one (LGPL is not suitable for C++ template libraries). Thanks very much for your work. Greetings, Alessandro Presta _

Re: sunbird marked as broken with gcc4.2

Hi again, Stefan Lambrev wrote: Hi again, I removed the BROKEN line from the port and compiled sunbird without problems. /var/db/ports/sunbird/options: WITHOUT_DEBUG=true WITHOUT_LOGGING=true WITHOUT_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=true May be because I do not use OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS? I'll check and this :)

INDEX now builds successfully on 5.x

___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: php5 does not buid

On Wednesday 03 October 2007, Martin Tournoij wrote: > On Tue 02 Oct 2007 18:10, Alexander Konovalenko wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I got an error while building php5: > > > > make clean build > > ===> Cleaning for php5-5.2.4_1 > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > > ===> Foun

Re: ImageMagick problems

--On Monday, October 01, 2007 17:13:35 -0400 Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: понеділок 01 жовтень 2007 05:01 по, Paul Schmehl Ви написали: You can find the config.log and config.status files here: If you need anything else, let me know.

Suitable port mail reject repeaters

Hi There have been numerous attempts on one server resulting in entries of the following type in the log:( [] is a domain for which we receive mail).) Oct  3 07:05:39 dns1 postfix/smtpd[93611]: connect from mail.dolbeyco.com[70.61.148.178] Oct  3 07:05:40 dns1 postfix/smtpd[93611]: NOQUEUE

Re: sunbird marked as broken with gcc4.2

Stefan Lambrev wrote: Hi again, Stefan Lambrev wrote: Hi again, I removed the BROKEN line from the port and compiled sunbird without problems. /var/db/ports/sunbird/options: WITHOUT_DEBUG=true WITHOUT_LOGGING=true WITHOUT_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=true May be because I do not use OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS?

Idea: static builds

Hi! I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful sometimes. Implementation seem pretty straightfoward to me: - Introduce STATIC_BUILD variable that changes usual build behavior - Process LIB_DEPENDS in a differ

Re: Suitable port mail reject repeaters

On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:12:31AM -0700, David Southwell wrote: > Hi > > There have been numerous attempts on one server resulting in entries of the > following type in the log:( [] is a domain for which we receive mail).) > > Oct ?3 07:05:39 dns1 postfix/smtpd[93611]: connect from > mail

Re: [kde-freebsd] x11/kdelibs3 and new cups breakage

On Oct 03, 2007, at 23:07 , Ade Lovett wrote: On Oct 03, 2007, at 21:53 , Andy Fawcett wrote: ports/116767 apparently has a fix, but I've not had time to check it out yet. I've added it to my tinderbox and just fired off another build, we'll see what happens (it appears to patch cleanly at

ports/mail/postfix/pkg-install breakage

ports/mail/postfix/pkg-install seems broken since yesterday, there is one too many "fi" at the end of the file: You already have a user "postfix", so I will use it. You already have user "postfix" in group "mail", so I will use it. /usr/ports/mail/postfix/pkg-install: 167: Syntax error: "fi" un

Re: ImageMagick problems

> http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ImageMagick/mcbt.txt Ok, it is only the PerlMagick tests, that are failing... Could you re-config to exclude EXR support and rebuild/retest? Thanks! -mi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

Re: ports/mail/postfix/pkg-install breakage

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:32:00AM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > ports/mail/postfix/pkg-install seems broken since yesterday, there is > one too many "fi" at the end of the file: Fixed, thank you for reporting. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavet

Re: ImageMagick problems

--On Thursday, October 04, 2007 18:47:28 -0400 Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ImageMagick/mcbt.txt Ok, it is only the PerlMagick tests, that are failing... Could you re-config to exclude EXR support and rebuild/retest? HmmmI couldn't find EXR s

Re: A problem with pidgin installation

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Dan A. wrote: Hi. While trying to install net-im/pidgin using portmaster, I get this error: I recently updated pidgin using portmaster, so I suspect that this error might be in the port. Can you please try installing the port without portmaster and let us know if it stil

Re: autoconf removal / Build error: KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer (kmastermind)

Since no one else responded I'll take a crack ... On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: portupgrade kmastermind-2.2_1 to kmastermind-2.2_2 failed: *** AUTOCONF NOT FOUND!. *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer What should I do about it? Moreover, portupgrade does not deal with th

Postfix Port - Extra 'fi'

I couldn't find who the maintainer is for the Postfix port in any file. I just attempted to install the Postfix port and received an error about an extra: fi at the end of /usr/ports/mail/postfix/pkg-install. Once I commented it out, the install completed successfully. Can someone direc

Re: Postfix Port - Extra 'fi'

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:17:43AM +, D Hill wrote: > > I couldn't find who the maintainer is for the Postfix port in any file. You should be able to do "make maintainer". > I just attempted to install the Postfix port and received an error about an > extra: > > fi > > at the end of /us

Re: Postfix Port - Extra 'fi'

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:17:43AM +, D Hill wrote: > I couldn't find who the maintainer is for the Postfix port in any file. > > I just attempted to install the Postfix port and received an error about > an extra: > > fi > > at the end of /usr/ports/mail/postfix/pkg-install. Once I comme

Re: ports/mail/postfix/pkg-install breakage

Oops! I should have read more email before I posted. I ran into the same thing earlier. I just commented out the last 'fi' and everything flew right through. On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 at 00:32 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: ports/mail/postfix/pkg-install seems broken since yesterday, there

Re: Postfix Port - Extra 'fi'

Thanks for the hit on "make maintainer" for the future. Ports have been updated now. On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 at 22:37 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:17:43AM +, D Hill wrote: I couldn't find who the maintainer is for the Postfix port in any file. You shou

Re: Postfix Port - Extra 'fi'

Repeat after me kids, "Before I report a ports problem I will wait one hour and then update my ports tree." :) Thanks, Doug (class dismissed) -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis

Re: [kde-freebsd] x11/kdelibs3 and new cups breakage

On Friday 05 October 2007 00:22:51 Ade Lovett wrote: > On Oct 03, 2007, at 23:07 , Ade Lovett wrote: > > On Oct 03, 2007, at 21:53 , Andy Fawcett wrote: > >> ports/116767 apparently has a fix, but I've not had time to check > >> it out yet. > > > > I've added it to my tinderbox and just fired off a

Re: [kde-freebsd] x11/kdelibs3 and new cups breakage

On Oct 04, 2007, at 21:45 , Andy Fawcett wrote: lofi@ normally handles our commits, but I've not seen him around for a week or so. With my part of the kde@ hat, I approve you to commit. He can shout at me later if I'm wrong :) Ok. Patch has been committed, PR closed, and as per your reque