Hi,
Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade
and other tools for upgrading installed applications to their newer
versions, how did things work out?
Did one upgrade applications through a series of "make deinstall
reinstall" commands (I wonder if these commands
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade and
> other tools for upgrading installed applications to their newer versions,
> how did things work out?
>
> Did one upgrade applications through a serie
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade
> and other tools for upgrading installed applications to their newer
> versions, how did things work out?
>
> Did one upgrade applications throu
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade
>> and other tools for upgrading installed applications to their newer
>> versions, how did things work out?
>>
>> Did on
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 01:33:57AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Jeremy Chadwick, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I'm one of those administrators who does not want something like
> portupgrade on his systems; I do not believe in having two separate
> databases maintaining dependencies and what's installed
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Along those lines, yes. I'm one of those administrators who does not
want something like portupgrade on his systems; I do not believe in
having two separate databases maintaining dependencies and what's
installed (portupgrade vs. base system pkg_* tools). Lots of people
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
"Makefile", line 65: warning: "/usr/sbin/pkg_info -O
x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server 2>/dev/null | /usr/bin/grep Server- ||
/usr/sbin/pkg_info -O x11-servers/xorg-server 2>/d
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:07:25PM +, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> INDEX build failed with errors:
> Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
> pkg_info: not found
> pkg_info: not found
> "Makefile", line 65: warning: "/usr/sbin/pkg_info -O
> x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server 2>/dev/null | /
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:55:23 +0530
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to port a package on FreeBSD. The package depends on Python
> v.2.5 (which is not default on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE), and some python
> modules. Now, the problem is that dependent python module
hi,
i've fbsd 62Rp7 installed.
i've updated my sys to use db46 (berkeley db), and set
WITH_BDB_VER/USE_BDB/etc accordingly in make.conf ...
current portupgrade complains:
** Port marked as IGNORE: mail/exim:
is marked as broken: WITH_BDB_VER must be either 1, 4, 41, 42, 43 or 44
fix
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:09:43PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:07:25PM +, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > INDEX build failed with errors:
> > Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
> > pkg_info: not found
> > pkg_info: not found
> > "Makefile", line 65: wa
snowcrash+freebsd wrote:
hi,
i've fbsd 62Rp7 installed.
i've updated my sys to use db46 (berkeley db), and set
WITH_BDB_VER/USE_BDB/etc accordingly in make.conf ...
current portupgrade complains:
** Port marked as IGNORE: mail/exim:
is marked as broken: WITH_BDB_VER must be either 1
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:37:22AM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade
> >> and other tools for upgrading installed applic
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:37:22AM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Hi,
Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade
and other tools for upgrading installed appl
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:01:27PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
>
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:37:22AM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
> >>Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>>On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a question t
hi,
> Sounds great, just one point: I'd prefer seeing that exim would make use
> of bsd.database.mk.
i /thought/ that use of WITH_BDB_VER/USE_BDB *is* 'making use of'
bsd.database.mk, wherein,
...
.if defined(WITH_BDB_VER)
. if ${WITH_BDB_VER} == 4
USE_BDB=40
. elif ${WITH_BDB_VER} != 1
snowcrash+freebsd wrote:
hi,
Sounds great, just one point: I'd prefer seeing that exim would make use
of bsd.database.mk.
i /thought/ that use of WITH_BDB_VER/USE_BDB *is* 'making use of'
bsd.database.mk, wherein,
...
.if defined(WITH_BDB_VER)
. if ${WITH_BDB_VER} == 4
USE_BDB=40
.
On 8/11/07, snowcrash+freebsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> > Sounds great, just one point: I'd prefer seeing that exim would make use
> > of bsd.database.mk.
>
> i /thought/ that use of WITH_BDB_VER/USE_BDB *is* 'making use of'
> bsd.database.mk, wherein,
>
> ...
> .if defined(WITH_BDB_VE
> exim will automatically pick up with bsd.database.mk changes.
ah. got it.
thx!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi,
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:37:18 -0500
> "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
swhetzel> Here's the correct code for BDB detection:
swhetzel> USE_BDB= 40+
Why do you specify USE_BDB as 40+, explicitly? Since, it is defined
as 41+ in bsd.database.mk, I believe USE_BDB=yes is enough.
On 8/11/07, Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:37:18 -0500
> > "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> swhetzel> Here's the correct code for BDB detection:
>
> swhetzel> USE_BDB= 40+
>
> Why do you specify USE_BDB as 40+, explicitly? Since, it
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> Did one upgrade applications through a series of "make deinstall reinstall"
> commands (I wonder if these commands take care of dependencies too) or was
> there any other way?
I used pkg_version -c, which has now been removed.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm curious now -- how does portupgrade (that's the tool I know/ use so
I'll use that as an example) do its upgrading? I have seen that in case of
an upgrade in builds the newer version, uninstalls the previous one (even
though it might be required by other apps), and then
Hi,
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:03:32 -0500
> "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
swhetzel> I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then patched
swhetzel> all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowest version that the port
swhetzel> supported into USE_BDB.
swhetzel>
After a lot of frustration with 300+ seperate ports being installed when I try
to install xorg. I tried to create a xorg-base port. I say I tried to because I
took a lot of shortcuts and this is my first time doing a port, so dont get mad
at me and I dont know if you guys will find this useful but
After a lot of frustration with 300+ seperate ports being installed when I try
to install xorg. I tried to create a xorg-base port. I say I tried to because I
took a lot of shortcuts and this is my first time doing a port, so dont get mad
at me and I dont know if you guys will find this useful b
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:51:41AM -0700, David Ericson Thiel wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> > Did one upgrade applications through a series of "make deinstall reinstall"
> > commands (I wonder if these commands take care of dependencies too) or was
On 8/11/07, Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:03:32 -0500
> > "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> swhetzel> I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then
> patched
> swhetzel> all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowe
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:02:53PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
>> 5. pkg_delete port
>
> I see. In step 5, "pkg_delete port" wont work if port is required by others
> right? So you delete those apps too? Could be a lot of stuff to uninstall,
> right?
Absolutely correct. That might seem li
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:42:30AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> portupgrade manages all the regular /var/db/pkg/*/* files just like
> any other tool. It's got its db files, sure, but they're caches, not
> alternate masters. I've never seen a "sync mismatch" (or rather, I
> see them all the t
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:33:22 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:02:53PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> >> 5. pkg_delete port
> >
> > I see. In step 5, "pkg_delete port" wont work if port is required
> > by others right? So you delete those apps too?
> I have now fixed it so that the exim port doesn't need to set WITH_BDB_VER?=1
> anymore. Instead setting either WITH_BDB or WITH_BDB_VER > 1 will make the
> port use Mk/bsd.database.mk to choose the version of BDB to use, otherwise it
> will default to the system BDB.
>
> The updated patch is
This discussion is probably more appropriate to freebsd-x11.
Followups re-directed.
On 2007-Aug-11 21:28:13 +0300, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After a lot of frustration with 300+ seperate ports being installed when I
>try to install xorg. I tried to create a xorg-base port. I say
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:02:53PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
5. pkg_delete port
I see. In step 5, "pkg_delete port" wont work if port is required by others
right? So you delete those apps too? Could be a lot of stuff to uninstall,
right?
Absolutely correct.
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Afaik portmaster's beauty is that it doesn't have any dependencies like
portuprade does. Doesn't require ruby etc, so upgrades to them don't cause
problems like they could with portupgrade. (Again, haven't used portmaster,
so I don't know; this is
36 matches
Mail list logo
