Hi,
currently the version of package nsc under the category net-mgmt is
0.52. can you please update it to latest version 0.80
(http://nsc-gothix.sourceforge.net/) ?
Thanks,
Alagar
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
> I think portmaster is also one tries to read and do the same things
> but with shell script.
Not exactly the same things. Portmaster doesn't keep any external
database, it only updates what is in /var/db/pkg.
> I personally didn't have good luck with portmaster and haven't
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:39:51PM +0530, Alagarsamy A wrote:
> can you please update it to latest version 0.80
> (http://nsc-gothix.sourceforge.net/) ?
ports@ is the "default" maintainer. No update will happen until someone
(you?) submits a PR for it.
mcl
__
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:00:35AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Could you test the fix from ports/114924 ? Looks like a cleaner fix to
> me.
Sure - that works as well. Here is an updated patch:
diff -urp /usr/ports/x11/xkeyboard-config/Makefile x11/xkeyboard-config/Makefile
--- /usr/ports/x11/xk
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:17:50 -0700
Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
To Whom Slowness of Portupgrade Concerns a Lot:
As I got tired of long waiting of portupgrade trying to resolve dependencies, I
came up with
yet another tool for upg
Note that the below instructions are not strictly accurate (*sigh*)
See http://freebsd.lovett.com/patches/autotools-updating.txt
for the UPDATING entry.
This has been tested on a machine with a full GNOME and KDE
environment installed and will become part of ports/UPDATING.
-aDe
On Jul 27
On 2007-Jul-27 07:51:57 +0100, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Would it be feasible to use CVS tags to mark the state of the ports
>tree whenever a package is successfully rebuilt by the cluster and
>pushed out to the FTP servers?
This would generate an immense amount of CVS repo churn
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:07:25 +1000
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the problem is more that there's a noticable delay between a
> port being updated and a matching set of packages being available.
At least for me, it hardly ever is an actual problem. I mean, building ports
fr
Hello list,
I've written an email to Pear port maintainer - but had no answer. Is
there anybody who can advice on below.
Many thanks,
Tofig.
Hello Alex,
first of all big thanks for maintaining the PEAR port for the FreeBSD
operating system ! Excellent work !
If you have a spare minute I
Hello,
unfortunately I'm not able to build py-qt4-core:
Script started on Fri Jul 27 18:54:28 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:...ports/devel/py-qt4-core# make install
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> Found saved configuration for py24-qt4-core-4.2_1
===> Extracting for py24-qt4
Garrett Cooper wrote:
>Every time you run make install, portmaster, or portupgrade, there's
> a lot of stuff going on behind the scenes. One of the things involved is
> installing package information in /var/db/pkg. That's where pkg_version
> gets its information from, along with portmaster (A
Manuel Stühn schrieb:
> ===> Building for py24-qt4-core-4.2_1
> c++ -c -pipe -fPIC -g -Wall -W -DQT_CORE_LIB -I. -I/usr/local/include
> -I/usr/local/include/python2.4 -I/usr/local/mkspecs/freebsd-g++
> -I/usr/local/include/QtCore -o
> sipQtCorepart
> 0.o sipQtCorepart0.cpp
> In file included fr
Hey, just wanted to give folks a heads up. I'm hearing that we may be
seeing a native Flash binary for FreeBSD in the future, depending on how
quick we can port over Tamarin:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/tamarin/
They are working on a Linux port now, if anybody is interested in
getting a FBSD
Hi Thomas,
* Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-17 22:54 +0200]:
> in its current form the ghc port depends on many X-related packages which
> makes it depend on xorg-7.2. As I want to install it on my server I was
> hoping I could avoid that (also it requires quite some manuel steps
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Kris Moore wrote:
Hey, just wanted to give folks a heads up. I'm hearing that we may be
seeing a native Flash binary for FreeBSD in the future, depending on how
quick we can port over Tamarin:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/tamarin/
They are working on a Linux port now,
Good morning (its morning here),
I tried to pkg_add tikiwiki-1.9.7 this morning and it failed. Im sorry but I
do not understand ports / packages well enough to ascertain exactly why it
failed but I will try and give a reasonable picture of what happened.
I have attached a text file of the key in
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Robert Hettner wrote:
Good morning (its morning here),
I tried to pkg_add tikiwiki-1.9.7 this morning and it failed. Im sorry but I
do not understand ports / packages well enough to ascertain exactly why it
failed but I will try and give a reasonable picture of what happen
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:47:14 -0700
Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:17:50 -0700
> > Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
> >>
> > Portupgrade is not only slow reading INDEX file but also on de
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:57:34 -0700
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
>
> > I think portmaster is also one tries to read and do the same things
> > but with shell script.
>
> Not exactly the same things. Portmaster doesn't keep any external
> database, it only updates w
Quite often the x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20 port does not compile with
the following error:
Making all in gconf
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/p2/x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/work/gnome-sharp-2.16.0/sample/gconf'
MONO_PATH=../../gconf/GConf/gconf-sharp.dll: mono
../../gconf/tools/gconfsharp-s
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 21:25 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Quite often the x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20 port does not compile with
> the following error:
>
> Making all in gconf
> gmake[3]: Entering directory
> `/usr/p2/x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/work/gnome-sharp-2.16.0/sample/gconf'
> M
Tom McLaughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 21:25 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Quite often the x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20 port does not compile with
the following error:
Making all in gconf
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/p2/x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20/work/gnome-sharp-2.16.0/samp
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 23:31 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Tom McLaughlin wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 21:25 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >> Quite often the x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20 port does not compile with
> >> the following error:
> >>
> >> Making all in gconf
> >>
Hiro,
I'm happy to respond to you, but first I'd like to make clear that I'm
not trying to talk you out of anything. If there is a better way to
manage ports, or even just a different approach, I'm all for it. I
don't think portmaster is a "one size fits all" tool, and I'm not
trying to make it on
24 matches
Mail list logo
