On 6/18/07, Marcus Alves Grando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Marcus Alves Grando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi lists,
>>
>> I finish compat6x port and i need testers. If you are interested you can
>> download shar file in http://people.freebsd.org/
Hi,
I'm getting the following on 5.5-STABLE built 18 Oct 2006:
box5# portsdb -uU
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..===>
arabic/ae_fonts_mono failed
*** Error code 1
===> accessibility/at-poke failed
*** Error code 1
2 errors
box5# more /root/ports-supfile
*defau
B Hayward wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the following on 5.5-STABLE built 18 Oct 2006:
box5# portsdb -uU
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..===>
arabic/ae_fonts_mono failed
*** Error code 1
===> accessibility/at-poke failed
*** Error code 1
2 errors
box5# more /root/po
Sam Lawrance wrote:
On 17/06/2007, at 7:33 AM, Stephen Hurd wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Actually, I found it quite easy to have the port pull the sources
from svn. Who are we concerned about making it easier for and why
(and how is it any easier?)
Everyone behind a firewall that only al
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
When I want to use Software that is not in ports, I get it into the ports tree.
I unfortunately don't have the time to maintain ports for every piece of
software I use.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Jun-16 20:44:53 -0700, Stephen Hurd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agreed, but this situation is not easy to detect with the automated
ports checks that are in place.
Impossible even since we're not using automated tools.
I was thinking of pointyhat
Quoting Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 17 Jun
2007 13:42:45 -0700):
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Alexander Leidinger píše v ne 17. 06. 2007 v 18:41 +0200:
On a related note, have you got a PR for the "make clean"-speedup?
What PR number would that be?
I don't know, the patch is
Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 22
May 2007 09:26:58 +0200):
Quoting Jeremy Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 21 May 2007 15:28:16 -0700):
Hi,
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:20:26AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
I tried to do the WRKDIR and _DEPEND_DIRS part in
Alex Dupre ha scritto:
Erwin Lansing wrote:
As I described earlier, SUP_UPDATE, CVS_UPDATE and PORTSNAP_UPDATE are
mutually exclusive and cannot be used at the same time.
From src/Makefile.inc1:
# update
#
# Update the source tree, by running cvsup and/or running cvs to update
# to the latest
Alexander Leidinger píše v po 18. 06. 2007 v 12:05 +0200:
> Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 22
> May 2007 09:26:58 +0200):
>
> > Quoting Jeremy Lea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 21 May 2007 15:28:16
> > -0700):
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:20:26A
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
I successfully used /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver-9631/Makefile to
install the 9639 version.
I just appended a "EXTRA_PATCHES=" line.
Maybe it's time to update to the latest legacy version at
ttp://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html
So far, my GeForce2 MX 100/200 is running ok =)
Cheers,
Igh
__
On 18/06/2007, at 7:28 PM, Stephen Hurd wrote:
Sam Lawrance wrote:
On 17/06/2007, at 7:33 AM, Stephen Hurd wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Actually, I found it quite easy to have the port pull the
sources from svn. Who are we concerned about making it easier
for and why (and how is it any
make config-recursive is probably what you want as was said earlier.
However, config-recursive only calls the make config for the dependancies,
if you for some reason add another dependancy(by selecting some optionas)
then the make config isn't called for this port.
That's why I recommend you to b
The way I do it is:
make BATCH=yes install clean
Hope that helps...
-Matt
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:10:29 +0200, "TooMany Secrets" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Excuse me if this is a estupid question, but in six years with
> FreeBSD, today I haven't still an answer to this:
> - If I
Using the apache port as the standard example of how ports should be
installed
I have noticed 2 things wrong with the mysql-server port.
First the port allocates the location for the databases to /var/db/mysql.
This location has no space allocated to hold database data.
It should be changed to /
I'm trying to install openoffice, and some sub-portion of the port is
installing bison2, and later it tries to install bison and then it
complains about conflicting ports. How is one supposed to deal with
sub-port conflicts like these? Why do we /ever/ allow ports to have
conflicts with other por
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:41:23PM -0400, Bob wrote:
> First the port allocates the location for the databases to /var/db/mysql.
> This location has no space allocated to hold database data.
> It should be changed to /usr/local/mysql
You're complaining about the default location of mysql_dbdir, w
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:02:41PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:41:23PM -0400, Bob wrote:
> > First the port allocates the location for the databases to /var/db/mysql.
> > This location has no space allocated to hold database data.
> > It should be changed to /usr/loc
On Jun 18, 2007, at 3:59 PM, Clint Olsen wrote:
I'm trying to install openoffice, and some sub-portion of the port is
installing bison2, and later it tries to install bison and then it
complains about conflicting ports. How is one supposed to deal with
sub-port conflicts like these? Why do we /
On Jun 18, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Two ports which install files to the same place conflict-- you can't
> have two different versions of a file at the same path location. With
> some work, it is possible to install multiple versions of some ports
> (like Perl, Berkeley DB, GNU autoconf, etc) using
On Jun 18, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Clint Olsen wrote:
[ ... ]
% ls -l /usr/local/bin/perl5
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 24 Mar 23 2006 /usr/local/bin/perl5@ -> /
usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8
...but it doesn't magically happen.
Ok, so I'm required to resolve this myself if I want to install
this port?
TooMany Secrets wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Excuse me if this is a estupid question, but in six years with
> FreeBSD, today I haven't still an answer to this:
> - If I make a "make install clean", in a port like "x11/kde3", are
> there any way to make the lack of questions? Or maybe better, are
> there any w
Sam Lawrance wrote:
Maybe I don't understand what you're trying to do. What's the point
of bumping PORTREVISION?
For that matter, what's the point of WITH_SVN given what you've just
said?
PORTREVISION == SVN Revision
The port is capable of fetching a specific revision directly from
Subver
On 19/06/2007, at 2:06 PM, Stephen Hurd wrote:
Sam Lawrance wrote:
Maybe I don't understand what you're trying to do. What's the
point of bumping PORTREVISION?
For that matter, what's the point of WITH_SVN given what you've
just said?
PORTREVISION == SVN Revision
OK, it makes sense t
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>> First the port allocates the location for the databases to /var/db/mysql.
>>> This location has no space allocated to hold database data.
>>> It should be changed to /usr/local/mysql
You can change it as you like with mysql_dbdir="/new/path", so this
isn't an issue.
> Or
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:46:42AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > What does it require? Not much: after each package built, somehow
> > a notice gets send to a database backend which grabs the tarball,
> > grabs the +CONTENTS files and stores that data.
>
> Fill in the "somehows" and we can hook
27 matches
Mail list logo
