On 2007-Jun-15 01:22:38 +0200, Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, now I see what you want. For example, you want xmms, portupgrade
>installs xmms+x1,x2... Then you install mplayer+y1,y2... with an option
>that links xmms as its dependency; then you want 'pkg_deinstall mplayer'
>to leave
Il giorno Gio, 14/06/2007 alle 15.22 -0400, Kris Kennaway ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:33:45AM +0200, Out-Law wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm a FreeBSD 4.x user and I've a problem compiling
> > print/ghostscript-gnu port on my system.
>
> 4.x is no longer supported, see the archives.
>
> K
Peter Jeremy writes:
> >At the first place, I think such a situation occurs extremly rare.
>
> For an opposing PoV: I often see ports that looks interesting or
> look like a possible solution to a problem and will install the
> port to have a play. If it turns out that it's not suitable,
Thanks for updating the port so quickly. I update my ports and received
the following new files:
Edit ports/net/samba-libsmbclient/Makefile
Edit ports/net/samba-libsmbclient/Makefile.inc
Edit ports/net/samba-libsmbclient/pkg-plist
However, it still dies at the same place.
Compiling libsmb/cl
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 08:24 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Peter Jeremy writes:
> >
> > For an opposing PoV: I often see ports that looks interesting or
> > look like a possible solution to a problem and will install the
> > port to have a play. If it turns out that it's not suitable, I
> > wou
You just updated this port and the change log contains no entrees about
this.
You added a massive amount of new dependants as compared to php5-gd-5.2.1_3
port
How can I turn off these new dependants as I don't see them listed in the
make config options?
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:11:25 +1000
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> On 2007-Jun-15 01:22:38 +0200, Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >At the first place, I think such a situation occurs extremly rare.
>
> For an opposing PoV: I often see ports that looks interesting or
Join Sergey on Quechup
You have been invited to join
SergeyLapin's
friends network
http://quechup.com/ - REGISTER NOW FOR FREE and find out why everyone's
joining
As a member of Quechup you can...
- Start a blog and share your thoughts with private groups, friends or the
world
- Get in touch wit
I hate to be a pain; if I knew how to fix it I would. The previous port
installed fine. I removed it and need to install the new one. Any idea
how to go back to the old port?
I updated again and received the same new files:
Edit ports/net/samba-libsmbclient/Makefile
Edit ports/net/samba-li
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:12:33PM +0200, Out-Law wrote:
> Il giorno Gio, 14/06/2007 alle 15.22 -0400, Kris Kennaway ha scritto:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:33:45AM +0200, Out-Law wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm a FreeBSD 4.x user and I've a problem compiling
> > > print/ghostscript-gnu port on my
Hi !
I'm trying to compile Cricket, but I get this error message :
server:/usr/ports/net-mgmt/cricket# make
===> cricket-1.0.5_4 uses a UID registered to another port.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/cricket.
Can anybody look into this problem ?
--
Med vennlig hilsen / Rega
Hi Frank,
I have some strange messages from cron daemon about ipfw2dshild.
And what is more interesting it appears only on WRAP platform (PC ENGINE), not
on other hardwares.
This mail for root from Cron Daemon:
Message 1:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 1 00:03:07 2000
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 00
Hi John,
thank you.
I have read a man page several times and there is nothing about this PATH
problem, that a user has to add something to the path or during installation
process there is no message about it.
So question is, it would be good to add info to man page or to "some magic
scripst",
Daniel Dvořák wrote:
Hi Frank,
I have some strange messages from cron daemon about ipfw2dshild.
And what is more interesting it appears only on WRAP platform (PC ENGINE), not
on other hardwares.
This mail for root from Cron Daemon:
Message 1:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 1 00:03:07 2000
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:42:45PM -0500, Thompson, M K Mr CTR USAF 1SOCS/SCBB
wrote:
> I hate to be a pain; if I knew how to fix it I would. The previous port
> installed fine. I removed it and need to install the new one. Any idea
> how to go back to the old port?
[...]
> checking for Act
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 10:40:27PM +0200, Roar Pettersen wrote:
> Hi !
> I'm trying to compile Cricket, but I get this error message :
> server:/usr/ports/net-mgmt/cricket# make
> ===> cricket-1.0.5_4 uses a UID registered to another port.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Can anybody look into this p
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 12:03:28AM +0200, Daniel Dvo??ák wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> thank you.
>
> I have read a man page several times and there is nothing about this PATH
> problem, that a user has to add something to the path or during installation
> process there is no message about it.
FreeBSD
On 16/06/2007, at 9:00 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 10:40:27PM +0200, Roar Pettersen wrote:
Hi !
I'm trying to compile Cricket, but I get this error message :
server:/usr/ports/net-mgmt/cricket# make
===> cricket-1.0.5_4 uses a UID registered to another port.
*** Er
Anyone else seen this? I will fetch fresh sources and try again tomorrow.
FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 11 13:28:10 CEST 2007
==>Entering directory
/usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-client/work/bacula-2.0.3/src/console
Compiling console.c
In file included from console.c:693:
console.c:60: error: pr
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:04 AM
To: Daniel Dvo??ák
Cc: 'John Merryweather Cooper'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: ipfw2dshield-0.5
> FreeBSD by default sets PATH to what you see in th
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 01:29:50AM +0200, Daniel Dvo??ák wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 1:04 AM
> To: Daniel Dvo??ák
> Cc: 'John Merryweather Cooper'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD
I was just wondering if one were to "upgrade" a FreeBSD installation
from i386 to amd64, would it require a complete recompilation of all
the ports? (I already know that it does require a recompilation of
world and the kernel).
Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports
Indigo 23 wrote:
> the ports? (I already know that it does require a recompilation of
> world and the kernel).
AFAIK nobody has succeeded in this (i.e. upgrading i386 to amd64 via
buildkernel/world) on-line far enough to tell the tale. You might be the
first :)
signature.asc
Description: Open
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:38:29AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Indigo 23 wrote:
>
> > the ports? (I already know that it does require a recompilation of
> > world and the kernel).
>
> AFAIK nobody has succeeded in this (i.e. upgrading i386 to amd64 via
> buildkernel/world) on-line far enough to te
24 matches
Mail list logo
