Christopher Hilton wrote:
Jonathan Horne wrote:
[...]
Everyone seems to be misunderstanding my question. I'm aware of how to
build mod_php5. I'm curious about why the default configuration builds
php5 as a standalone CLI and CGI rather than as an apache module. I'm
assuming that there is s
Hi,
I`m having trouble with php5-5.2.3 and filled out a bug report
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=41645 can somebody else reproduce this with
the code given in the bug report, or am I the only one experiencing this? It
crashes without debug, and it works with debug on my machine.
Descriptio
On 10/06/07, Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I`m having trouble with php5-5.2.3 and filled out a bug report
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=41645 can somebody else reproduce this with
the code given in the bug report, or am I the only one experiencing this? It
crashes without debug,
Updating a port and ran into a problem... patch does not create files/
because this folder did not appear in the old port.
How can I coerce patch to create the files/ folder?
Using diff -Pru or -Nru don't work unless I fake it and create an empty
files/ in the old port.
Sorry if this has been aske
Hi
Are files in /var/db/portsnap/files important after "portsnap update"
has been run, or can they be deleted, from example within a cron job?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi!
Does anyone have an idea whats happening here? It builds on i386,
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-7-latest-logs/qemu-devel-0.9.0s.20070526.log
and when I queued it on tb3 (which also is amd64) it built too,
http://tb3.droso.net/logs/7-nox/qemu-devel-0.9.0s.20070526.l
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Hi
>
> Are files in /var/db/portsnap/files important after "portsnap update"
> has been run, or can they be deleted, from example within a cron job?
>
They have to be downloaded again the next time "portsnap fetch" is called.
___
fr
Thanks for the help.
I solved it by removing all the lines with a 4.1.2 entry from catalog.ports.
It's an ungly workaround, but it did the trick.
pkg_which now returns docbook-sk-4.1.2
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>>> I see the files are already registered with the catalog on your
>>> machines. Can you t
在 2007-06-10日的 19:03 +0200，Ivan Voras写道：
> Hi
>
> Are files in /var/db/portsnap/files important after "portsnap update"
> has been run, or can they be deleted, from example within a cron job?
They are important for your next "portsnap fetch" run, which means that
next run would download only a sm
If for some reason you have not enough space in /var, you can just create a
symlink or set the path in /etc/portsnap.conf(/usr/local/etc/portsnap.conf
if it's the one from ports).
On 6/10/07, Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
哺 2007-06-10耒��19:03 +0200▏Ivan Voras厚��│
> Hi
>
> Are files in /var/
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I guess that mod_php5 depends on Apache and maintainer don't want this
big dependency. The second is - if it will depends on Apache of some
version (eg. 1.3) it will be broken with another version (2.0 and 2.2).
It apply for binary packages. If somebody is compiling por
Hi there,
As per discussion with re@ and the PAM maintainer, I'm about to
commit a change to CURRENT's pam_nologin(8) that needs consequent
changes to pam.conf(5) files. Namely, the module's PAM function
class will change from "auth" to "account".
How ports are concerned:
First of all, a few po
Momchil Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
I`m having trouble with php5-5.2.3 and filled out a bug report
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=41645 can somebody else reproduce this with
the code given in the bug report, or am I the only one experiencing this? It
crashes without debug, and it works with debug on my
On Sunday 10 June 2007 22:23:44 Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> It doen't crash.
>
> Maybe you could try change order of extensions in
> /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini
> I see lot off crashes with "wrong" order of extensions.
>
> Miroslav Lachman
It seems like I`m the only one experiencing the crash
If you have received this message in error or if you would
like to be removed from our broadcast for any reason, reply
to this email with REMOVE as subject followed by the email
address you wish to remove.
***
ComputerWide, Inc.
23679 Calaba
Is there anything in the ports tree that can convert a PostScript file
to a PDF file?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:21:58 -0700 Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
replied:
>On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 22:06 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> Is there anything in the ports tree that can convert a PostScript file
>> to a PDF file?
>
>jill ~>which ps2pdf
>/usr/local/bin/ps2pdf
>jill ~>pkg_which /u
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:06:49 -0500 (CDT)
Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anything in the ports tree that can convert a
> PostScript file to a PDF file?
Hello Scott,
Of course, print/ghostscript*; for example (ghostscript-gpl):
%/usr/local/bin/gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH \
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:30:48 +0200 Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
replied:
>On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:06:49 -0500 (CDT)
>Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is there anything in the ports tree that can convert a
>> PostScript file to a PDF file?
>
>Hello Scott,
>
>Of course, pri
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 22:06 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> Is there anything in the ports tree that can convert a PostScript file
> to a PDF file?
jill ~>which ps2pdf
/usr/local/bin/ps2pdf
jill ~>pkg_which /usr/local/bin/ps2pdf
ghostscript-afpl-8.54_4,1
--
Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:39:00 -0500 (CDT)
Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the gs(1) example. I have portinstall running right
> now to install ghostscript-afpl. I noticed, though, that
> ghostscript-afpl apparently wants a deprecated version of the
> ghostscript port in
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:56:32 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:39:00 -0500 (CDT)
> Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the gs(1) example. I have portinstall running right
> > now to install ghostscript-afpl. I noticed, though, that
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:56:32 +0200 Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:39:00 -0500 (CDT)
>Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the gs(1) example. I have portinstall running right
>> now to install ghostscript-afpl. I noticed, though, that
23 matches
Mail list logo
