Jo Rhett, 09.06.07, 01:06h CEST:
> Hello? Bueller?
>
> On Jun 4, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113167
> >
> > This updates CFengine to 2.2.1, which notably has full support for package
> > management in FreeBSD...
Please be a bit more
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
--
%kill -9 -1
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Jo,
First of all, thanks for the PR you have submitted.
Jo Rhett wrote:
Hello? Bueller?
On Jun 4, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113167
This updates CFengine to 2.2.1, which notably has full support for
package management in FreeBSD...
Hi
Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if they would
consider the merits/demerits of adding:
1. An ./options-descr file in the port directory that describes the options,
their purpose and any notes about an option
Reasons:
This would be extremely useful for anyone
On Saturday 09 June 2007 18:36, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if
> they would consider the merits/demerits of adding:
>
> 1. An ./options-descr file in the port directory that describes the
> options, their purpose and any notes abo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Hilton
Sent: 9 juin 2007 15:51
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; User Questions
Subject: Php5 port and Apache Module
I can see that if I build the php5 port it defaults to CLI and CGI mode
but the
I can see that if I build the php5 port it defaults to CLI and CGI mode
but the Apache module is not built. Am I wrong when I assume that the
Apache Module will have the best performance? I guess that I'd just like
to understand the engineering decisions behind the default in the port's
configu
On Saturday 09 June 2007 11:20:21 Benjamin Lutz wrote:
> On Saturday 09 June 2007 18:36, David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if
> > they would consider the merits/demerits of adding:
> >
> > 1. An ./options-descr file in the port dir
I've manually upgraded a few Xorg packages recently to the latest
versions available on the ftp sites. As a result, portversion is now
giving erroneous results for some packages:
# portversion -v -O -L ='
inputproto-1.4.2> succeeds port (port has 1.3.2)
libX11-1.1.2<
On Saturday 09 June 2007 13:33:17 you wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:36:51AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if they
> > would consider the merits/demerits of adding:
> >
> > 1. An ./options-descr file in the port dir
The php4 & php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0.
Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module
turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done
anything
in any way of justifying removing the apache module from the default setting
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:36:51AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if they would
> consider the merits/demerits of adding:
>
> 1. An ./options-descr file in the port directory that describes the options,
> their purpose and
Bob wrote:
The php4 & php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0.
Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module
turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done
anything
in any way of justifying removing the apache module from the de
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 03:58:31PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> I've manually upgraded a few Xorg packages recently to the latest
> versions available on the ftp sites. As a result, portversion is now
> giving erroneous results for some packages:
>
> # portversion -v -O -L ='
> inputproto-1
On Saturday 09 June 2007 14:13:10 Christopher Hilton wrote:
> Bob wrote:
> > The php4 & php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0.
> > Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module
> > turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done
> Bob wrote:
>> The php4 & php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0.
>> Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module
>> turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done
>> anything
>> in any way of justifying removing the apache mod
Jonathan Horne wrote:
Bob wrote:
The php4 & php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0.
Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module
turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done
anything
in any way of justifying removing the ap
17 matches
Mail list logo
