-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy,
Thanks to all who've inquired about doing the xorg upgrade using
portmaster. I appreciate your patience in waiting for me to provide
instructions for it, but it's been quite an exciting journey. I just
committed a new version of portmaster (1.1
On Sunday 27 May 2007 04:55:37 Doug Barton wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Thanks to all who've inquired about doing the xorg upgrade using
> portmaster. I appreciate your patience in waiting for me to provide
> instructions for it, but it's been quite an exciting journey. I just
> committed a new version of p
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:02:06PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> On a recent -CURRENT (with the new GCC):
>
> # make
>...
> ===> Configuring for qemu-devel-0.9.0s.20070526
> WARNING: "cc" looks like gcc 4.x
> QEMU is known to have problems when compiled with gcc 4.x
> It is recommended that you u
Hi
I have been using FreeBSD for 5 years and I make a weekly ports upgrade.
But starting from last Sunday I am not able to run "portsdb -Uu".
Here is the error:
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..===>
arabic/ae_fonts_mono failed *** Error code 1
===> accessibility/at
Hello,
just want to know, if anyone is planning to change the news
xorg-metaports, so you can really make use of the new modularity?
So you can choose which programs you really want to install when
running make config.
I'm not sure how much work this will be, but I think some people would
appreciat
On 05/27/07 07:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:02:06PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
On a recent -CURRENT (with the new GCC):
# make
...
===> Configuring for qemu-devel-0.9.0s.20070526
WARNING: "cc" looks like gcc 4.x
QEMU is known to have problems when compiled with gcc 4.x
I
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:32:18PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> On 05/27/07 07:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:02:06PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> >>On a recent -CURRENT (with the new GCC):
> >>
> >># make
> >>...
> >>===> Configuring for qemu-devel-0.9.0s.20070526
> >>WAR
On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:39:34 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (4)
> Then, I moved back working Xorg-6.9 xorg.conf, adjusted fonts and
> module paths, but got very poor results with 1280x1024 (bad image,
> cursor ghosts, heavy flickering, etc.). I tried to tune HorizSync,
> VertRefre
On 05/27/07 13:52, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:32:18PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
On 05/27/07 07:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:02:06PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
On a recent -CURRENT (with the new GCC):
# make
...
===> Configuring for qemu-devel-0.9.
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> Given that we do not have an update solution which nicely works for
>> some non-trivial setups and situations I'm afraid this is going to
>> hurt us.
> Can you explain to which situations you refer?
One kind of setup I am running is a ports tree mount o
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 09:58:33PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >> Given that we do not have an update solution which nicely works for
> >> some non-trivial setups and situations I'm afraid this is going to
> >> hurt us.
> > Can you explain to which sit
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
index" and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKGNAME" for every installed package.
Now "make -V PKGNAME" should be a speedy operation, but the make has to
load in and analyz
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 02:03:29PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> On 05/27/07 13:52, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:32:18PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> >>On 05/27/07 07:58, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >>>On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:02:06PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> On a recent
After updating my test system to the lastest X.org packages and making
the adjustments to emulators/wine which I include at the end, my testing
caught the fact that Wine longer builds the following files:
tar: lib/wine/glu32.dll.so: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
tar: lib/wine/libglu3
Stephen Montgomery-Smith said:
> I suggest rewriting "make" so that variables are only evaluated on a
> "need to know" basis.
> or "I have tried to do this."
Of course a lot of people have thinked about it, and quickly realized
that it was not going to work. In the bsd.ports.mk, evaluation
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
> index" and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
> pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKGNAME" for every installed package. Now
> "
Hi,
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:30:48PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Does it need to be done this way? Can we just iterate through all of
> the ports, call make -V _DEPEND_DIRS, then sort | uniq the results?
This is exactly what ALL-DEPENDS-LIST does. Except it's faster. It
keeps two lists a
> Looks like nslookup is crashing out with a missing symbol, __udivdi3.
bingo! my error. i run a special version of bind and had not rebuilt.
Sorry for my lapse.
randy
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
Not quite what you asked for but...
Given the size and complexity of the port system I have long
felt that rather than do everything via more and more complex
Mk/*.mk what is is needed is a ports server and a thin CLI
frontend to it.
This server can store dependency data in an efficient manner,
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:01:31PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:56:29PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >>It doesn't fail for me :(.
> >>
> >>Can you tell me what is different about pointyhat regards the
> >>openssl stuff?
It doesn't fail for me :(.
Can you tell me what is different about pointyhat regards the
openssl stuff?
It uses the openssl command line to generate the hash values, and
your setup is whining about duplicate hashes.
I can't reproduces the failure :(
I also just submitted an update to 0.70,
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:56:29PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
It doesn't fail for me :(.
Can you tell me what is different about pointyhat regards the
openssl stuff?
It uses the openssl command line to generate the hash values, and
your setup is whi
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:00:53PM +0200, Hagen K?hl wrote:
> just want to know, if anyone is planning to change the news
> xorg-metaports, so you can really make use of the new modularity?
> So you can choose which programs you really want to install when
> running make config.
It has been discus
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:01:31PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:56:29PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
It doesn't fail for me :(.
Can you tell me what is different about pointyhat re
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:16:11PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:01:31PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >>On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:56:29PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 06:56:29PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> It doesn't fail for me :(.
>
> Can you tell me what is different about pointyhat regards the
> openssl stuff?
>
> It uses the openssl command line to generate the hash values, and
> your setup is whining about duplicate hashes.
>
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You can compare to the log from pointyhat to try and find the
difference and backtrack to the cause.
No such luck.
Pointyhat:
[..3104 lines elided..]
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/work/a/ports/mail/cone/work/cone-0.69/libmail'
gmake[2]: Leaving dire
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith said:
I suggest rewriting "make" so that variables are only evaluated on a
"need to know" basis.
or "I have tried to do this."
Of course a lot of people have thinked about it, and quickly realized
that it was not going
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
index" and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKGNAME" for every installed
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:15:28AM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
> To gain some performance, a first idea would be to simplify
> bsd.ports.mk. I am convinced that a substantial part of the 4000 lines
> are historical crap which serve no useful purpose.
11272 of LOC in bsd.*.mk, but who's counting.
>
I'm looking for something that will work with the existing framework.
But yes, I get the feeling that maybe using "make" to process the ports
might be the source of the problem. Make is a program primarily
designed for figuring out which was made first, the target or the
source, but in the por
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:16:11AM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> It has been discussed on IRC, and I'm pretty sure that flz@ has
> been thinking about it during his sweat-shop-job. My opinion is:
> let's do the upgrade to 7.2 and the new framework first, then see
> what can be done about OPTIONiz
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 08:44:56PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> In summary, the ports infrastructure is really complicated because it's
> trying to deal with all kinds of constraints and conditions. I challenge
Reading this, I was wondering what the ports infrastructure has
ever done for us?
See
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:42:52PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >
> >You can compare to the log from pointyhat to try and find the
> >difference and backtrack to the cause.
> >
> No such luck.
>
> Pointyhat:
>
> [..3104 lines elided..]
> gmake[3]:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 08:44:56PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > In summary, the ports infrastructure is really complicated because it's
> > trying to deal with all kinds of constraints and conditions. I challenge
> Reading this
On May 27, 2007, at 10:14 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:42:52PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You can compare to the log from pointyhat to try and find the
difference and backtrack to the cause.
No such luck.
Pointyhat:
[..3
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 10:51:56PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 08:44:56PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > In summary, the ports infrastructure is really complicated because it's
> > > trying to deal with
Jun Kuriyama wrote:
At Fri, 25 May 2007 12:48:36 +0800,
Ganbold wrote:
Since ports tree is unfrozen, could you integrate my patch to ports tree?
Here is the patch.
Please let me know if there is something wrong with this patch.
Thanks, committed!
Thanks a lot.
Ganbold
I've just upgraded my Inspiron 5100 to the latest and greatest X.org
release, 7.2. Using the standard configuration options (either no
config file, or the one generated by X -configure), most keys on the
keyboard don't react. I've ran xev against the server and find that
the only keys that react
39 matches
Mail list logo
