Speedup for make clean-depends (and thus make clean)

Hi, the attached patch speeds up make clean-depends in the case when not a lot of work directories exist (basic idea by Jeremy Lea). It does this by only including dirs in the cleaning where a WRKDIR exists. In the X.org 7.2 dependency tree case and a completely clean ports tree it is a speedup f

Re: Xorg 7.2 funal upgrade trouble

El domingo 20 de mayo a las 01:15:45 CEST, Dmitry Morozovsky escribió: > On Sun, 20 May 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > PL> Dmitry Morozovsky p??e v ne 20. 05. 2007 v 02:50 +0400: > PL> > PL> > However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange > erro > PL> > (last few lines

Re: Xorg 7.2.0 Release

Le 19/05/2007 à 17:27:42-0400, Colin Percival a écrit > Garrett Cooper wrote: > > Please be aware that the portsnap snapshot hasn't been updated yet to > > include the X.org 7.2 addition, if you use portsnap. > > Right now, portsnap is distributing half of Xorg 7.2. This isn't portsnap's > fault

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That rates as the biggest commit I recall seeing: > - Affecting 7868 files > - Updating 6168 ports > - Creating 255 new ports > - 700KB, 14553 line commit message The commit message never showed up in my inbox... DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROT

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

On 5/20/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That rates as the biggest commit I recall seeing: > - Affecting 7868 files > - Updating 6168 ports > - Creating 255 new ports > - 700KB, 14553 line commit message The commit message never showed

ghostscript-gpl has a wrong PORTREVISION

Hi, from the Makefile: ---snip--- PORTVERSION=${GS_VERSION} PORTREVISION= 1 PORTREVISION= ${GS_REVISION} ---snip--- Bye, Alexander. -- Know what I hate most? Rhetorical questions. -- Henry N. Camp http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 ht

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Am 17.05.2007 um 22:58 schrieb Stephen Montgomery-Smith: Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Alexander Leidinger wrote: As portupgrade cleans before and after updating a port, optimizing this may also be beneficial. Maybe first trying to construct all dependencies of the installed ports like in

Re: ghostscript-gpl has a wrong PORTREVISION

Alexander Leidinger píše v ne 20. 05. 2007 v 13:40 +0200: > from the Makefile: > ---snip--- > PORTVERSION=${GS_VERSION} > PORTREVISION= 1 > PORTREVISION= ${GS_REVISION} > ---snip--- Fixed! -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In God we trust. All other

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:37:23AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > [Picking a random posting] > > For the past 4 days, you have been making a variety of "doing X broke > Y" comments in a variety of threads without ever providing sufficient > information to allow someone else to make a sensible respon

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

Ok, everything upgraded fine after some more pkgdb -F and portupgrade -a, except : x11-toolkits/tix x11-toolkits/qt4-gui I removed them since they were left overs from some app I used some time ago and I don't need them any more. However the mergebase script is complaining now th

older nvidia version won't build after xorg upgrade

nvidia-driver-7184 and nvidia-driver-9631 failed to build. Building works after applying the attached patch. Feel free to modify it, if you don't like it. Stefandiff -ruN nvidia-driver.bak/Makefile nvidia-driver/Makefile --- nvidia-driver.bak/Makefile Sat May 19 22:27:07 2007 +++ nvidia-driver/

FreeBSD Port: p7zip-4.45

Hi there I have recently done a portupgrade on a 4.11 server and keep hitting the following error (installing this as I am trying to use amavisd-new). Can you point me in the right direct to resolve the problem? Thanks David ===> Configuring for p7zip-4.45 ===> Building for p7zip-4.45 mk

Re: FreeBSD Port: p7zip-4.45

David Hunt píše v ne 20. 05. 2007 v 21:57 +0930: > I have recently done a portupgrade on a 4.11 server and keep hitting 4.11 is no longer supported. > String.cpp:59: implicit declaration of function `int towlower(...)' 4.11 lacks many wide character functions. -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:24:29PM +0300, Laganakos Vassilis wrote: > X11 still works fine, although I noticed that some applications > that still work, use quite larger fonts... Strange, any ideas about > this? Ok this is because the xorg.xonf uses the old path to the fonts path. Corrected that w

Setting X11BASE

Hello. I'm trying to do security updates on a few hosts of mine, but nothing (portsdb, portupgrade, ...) will work, with the following reason. >On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default >X11BASE by itself so please help it a bit by setting >X11BASE=${LOCALBASE} in m

X.org update broke emulators/wine with old version of X

On my FreeBSD 6.2 test system with xorg-libraries-6.9.0 I am getting the following build failure after the X.org update: ../../tools/winegcc/winegcc -B../../tools/winebuild -shared ./ddraw.spec clipper.o ddraw.o ddraw_thunks.o device.o direct3d.o executebuffer.o gamma.o light.o main.o mate

Re: Thunderbird & OpenLDAP (Was: Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing)

On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:05:40PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 01:34 +0100, Tim Bishop wrote: > > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 07:05:05PM -0400, Howard Goldstein wrote: > > > Tim Bishop wrote: > > > > The problem is identical with all three. I have openldap installed: > > > >

Re: X.org update broke emulators/wine with old version of X

Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On my FreeBSD 6.2 test system with xorg-libraries-6.9.0 I am getting > the following build failure after the X.org update: > > ../../tools/winegcc/winegcc -B../../tools/winebuild -shared ./ddraw.spec > clipper.o ddraw.o ddraw_thunks.o device.o direct3d.o executebuffer.

lang/jdk14 is broken with xorg42

Hi, I found lang/jdk14 is broken with xorg42 with following error message. ../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt/awt_motif21.c:26: error: conflicting types for 'XmImGetXIC' /usr/local/include/Xm/XmIm.h:92: error: previous declaration of 'XmImGetXIC' was here ../../../src/solaris/native/sun/awt/awt

Re: Thunderbird & OpenLDAP (Was: Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing)

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:45:32PM +0100, Tim Bishop wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:05:40PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 01:34 +0100, Tim Bishop wrote: > > > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 07:05:05PM -0400, Howard Goldstein wrote: > > > > Tim Bishop wrote: > > > > > The p

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing (could not open default font 'fixed' error)

Hello list, 1-I've successfully upgraded my ports tree 2-use /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh and make required sym-link to /usr/local/lib/X11 3- run X -configure 4- run X -config xorg.conf.new but i have an error: could not open default font 'fixed' I forgot something? Thnanks X Window

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing (could not open default font 'fixed' error)

On Sun, 20 May 2007 18:55:43 +0200 Gaye Abdoulaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello list, > 1-I've successfully upgraded my ports tree > 2-use /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh and make required > sym-link to /usr/local/lib/X11 > 3- run X -configure > 4- run X -config xorg.conf.new > but i ha

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:12:50PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 5/20/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That rates as the biggest commit I recall seeing: > > > - Affecting 7868 files > > > - Updating 6168 ports > > > - Crea

Re: Setting X11BASE

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:13:42PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > I'm trying to do security updates on a few hosts of mine, but nothing > (portsdb, portupgrade, ...) will work, with the following reason. > > >On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default > >X11B

Re: Xorg 7.2 funal upgrade trouble

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:23:12AM +0200, Jos? Garc?a Juanino wrote: > # diff /usr/ports/Templates/BSD.local.dist /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist > > --- /usr/ports/Templates/BSD.local.dist Sat May 19 23:55:00 2007 > +++ /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist Tue May 9 21:42:12 2006 > @@ -1,4 +1,

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > That rates as the biggest commit I recall seeing: > > - Affecting 7868 files > > - Updating 6168 ports > > - Creating 255 new ports > > - 700KB, 14553 line commit message > > The co

Re: X.org update broke emulators/wine with old version of X

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:29:07PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On my FreeBSD 6.2 test system with xorg-libraries-6.9.0 I am getting > the following build failure after the X.org update: > > ../../tools/winegcc/winegcc -B../../tools/winebuild -shared ./ddraw.spec > clipper.o ddraw.o ddraw_t

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing (could not open default font 'fixed' error)

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 07:26:00PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: > On Sun, 20 May 2007 18:55:43 +0200 > Gaye Abdoulaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello list, > > 1-I've successfully upgraded my ports tree > > 2-use /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh and make required > > sym-link to /usr/loc

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The commit message never showed up in my inbox... > Check your mail log. On my system I have cvsmail configured to add > diffs to the commit mails (which is implemented by repeatedly querying > cvsweb),

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:42:05PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The commit message never showed up in my inbox... > > Check your mail log. On my system I have cvsmail configured to add > > diff

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

* Erwin Lansing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The commit broke freshports in new and interesting ways. The size of > the commit makes two jobs deadlock eachother in some way, but > unfortunately Dan is busy with BSDCan and now PGcon, so it can take a > couple of days before he has time to look mor

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: cvs commit: CVSROOT approvers avail]

A bit belatedly, but this means that the tree is now in a slush. We will allow 3 kinds of fixes, but only after explicit approval from portmgr: 1) xorg fixes (flz has blanket approval) 2) security issues 3) broken ports We expect the slush to last only a few days, unless something major turned u

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing (could not open default font 'fixed' error)

El domingo 20 de mayo a las 18:55:43 CEST, Gaye Abdoulaye escribió: > Hello list, > 1-I've successfully upgraded my ports tree > 2-use /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh and make required sym-link to > /usr/local/lib/X11 > 3- run X -configure > 4- run X -config xorg.conf.new > but i have

net/vnc : slight, potential problem

1. It uses /usr/X11R6 in the configure process instead of the correct new location for Xorg. 2. The port requires xfree86 4.8.x. Compiling stuff straight out of the box works partially solves stuff, but I think that the problem lies in the fact that it's not finding some X utilities properly (

Re: X.org update broke emulators/wine with old version of X

On Sun, 20 May 2007, Florent Thoumie wrote: >> Can someone more familiar with this lend a helping hand, please? I >> assume we do want to support users still running older versions of X, >> don't we? > Not really. This is why XFree86-4 will go away in a few months. > > In that case, it's not abou

Re: X.org update broke emulators/wine with old version of X

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:23:43PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 20 May 2007, Florent Thoumie wrote: > >> Can someone more familiar with this lend a helping hand, please? I > >> assume we do want to support users still running older versions of X, > >> don't we? > > Not really. This is wh

Re: Setting X11BASE

--On May 20, 2007 3:13:42 PM +0200 Andrea Venturoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello. I'm trying to do security updates on a few hosts of mine, but nothing (portsdb, portupgrade, ...) will work, with the following reason. >On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default >X

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing (could not open default font 'fixed' error)

On Sun, 20 May 2007 14:35:02 -0400 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 07:26:00PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: > > On Sun, 20 May 2007 18:55:43 +0200 > > Gaye Abdoulaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello list, > > > 1-I've successfully upgraded my ports tree >

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing (could not open default font 'fixed' error)

A fresh install of freebsd without xorg at the first time and after pkg_add -r xorg (with latest stbale packages) seem to solve my problem. May be I did mistakes the first time while upgrading to xorg-7.2 I am trying kde now. Thanks all ___ freebsd-port

Re: Setting X11BASE

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:46:01PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On May 20, 2007 3:13:42 PM +0200 Andrea Venturoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Hello. > >I'm trying to do security updates on a few hosts of mine, but nothing > >(portsdb, portupgrade, ...) will work, with the following reason. >

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing (could not open default font 'fixed' error)

Shaun Sabo a écrit : is Xorg -configure broken? On 5/20/07, *Gaye Abdoulaye* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: A fresh install of freebsd without xorg at the first time and after pkg_add -r xorg (with latest stbale packages) seem to solve my problem. May be

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing (could not open default font 'fixed' error)

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:26:02PM +0200, Gaye Abdoulaye wrote: > Shaun Sabo a ?crit : > >is Xorg -configure broken? > > > >On 5/20/07, *Gaye Abdoulaye* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> wrote: > > > >A fresh install of freebsd without xorg at the first time and after > >pk

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing (could not open default font 'fixed' error)

is Xorg -configure broken? On 5/20/07, Gaye Abdoulaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A fresh install of freebsd without xorg at the first time and after pkg_add -r xorg (with latest stbale packages) seem to solve my problem. May be I did mistakes the first time while upgrading to xorg-7.2 I am tryi

Bank of Queensland Account Information

[header_logo.gif] _ personal & business services Security Alert Please note that your Bank of Queensland Online Account has expired. In order for it to remain active, please use the link below to proceed and r

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing (could not open default font 'fixed' error)

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:16:37PM -0400, Shaun Sabo wrote: > is Xorg -configure broken? Not that we know of. See my other replies. Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe,

New xorg packages available for i386 and amd64 6.2-STABLE

I have uploaded full package sets for i386 and amd64 6.2-STABLE systems. These will make their way out onto the various mirrors according to their usual update cycle, but the two servers in the ftp.freebsd.org pool appear to have complete sets already. Instead of compiling the new x.org upgrade f

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

Parv wrote: I am using FreeBSD 6. I haven't tried xorg 7.2 port(s) yet, but recently did merge /usr/X11R6 to /usr/local (programs reinstalled, made link to X11R6 to local, and such). On a reboot after that, scripts indeed ran twice. That was very annoying. and mildly surprising, as the script

Re: Setting X11BASE

--On May 20, 2007 4:24:15 PM -0400 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm in the same situation, with several headless servers with no X running but xorg-libraries installed as a dependency. I tried running portupgrade -ai on one server. It failed. I ran pkgdb -L and fixed a tons of d

Re: Setting X11BASE

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:28:56PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > If you can show me where the instructions are for UPDATING a headless > server that's not running xorg at all but has some xorg libraries as > dependencies to other ports, I'd be happy to follow those instructions > instead. All u

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

On Sat, 19 May 2007, Florent Thoumie wrote: As you may already know, the X11 team has been working hard for the past few months to upgrade X.org ports to 7.2. After a couple of weeks of testing, we've finally committed this upgrade. We also decided to make the PREFIX merge at the same time (movi

Re: Setting X11BASE

--On May 20, 2007 5:36:26 PM -0400 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:28:56PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: If you can show me where the instructions are for UPDATING a headless server that's not running xorg at all but has some xorg libraries as dependencies to

Re: Speeding up pkg_version and perhaps other port utilities

Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 19 May 2007 23:48:52 -0500): On my system, the program pkg_version can double its speed simply by replacing "make -V PKGNAME" by "make BEFOREPORTMK=yes -V PKGNAME" This is very cool! I've already added it t

Re: Speedup for make clean-depends (and thus make clean)

Alexander Leidinger wrote: I could write such a new target, e.g. limited-clean, which could be used with update tools if there's some interest in something like this from the author of such a tool. Once again, I appreciate all the effort that's going into thinking about this stuff. :) For p

FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.1.18

I ugpraded from mysql 5.1.15 to 5.1.18 via portsupgrade, and now cannot run mysql. Errors: 070520 22:41:09 mysqld started 070520 22:41:09 [Warning] Server variable data_file_path of plugin InnoDB was forced to be read-only: string variable without update_func and PLUGIN_VAR_MEMALLOC flag 070520

Re: Speeding up pkg_version and perhaps other port utilities

Doug Barton wrote: Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 19 May 2007 23:48:52 -0500): On my system, the program pkg_version can double its speed simply by replacing "make -V PKGNAME" by "make BEFOREPORTMK=yes -V PKGNAME" This is very cool! I'v

Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.1.18

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 06:43:37PM -0400, Paul Laudanski wrote: > I ugpraded from mysql 5.1.15 to 5.1.18 via portsupgrade, and now cannot > run mysql. Errors: > > 070520 22:41:09 mysqld started > 070520 22:41:09 [Warning] Server variable data_file_path of plugin > InnoDB was forced to be read-on

Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.1.18

Should be able to just roll your ports tree back to when it included 5.1.X or manually update the couple of files required and then rebuild. That said it may not be that which is causing your issue check to see if you enhancing the memory sizes using the following, N.B. adjust sizes to be appropr

Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.1.18

Steven Hartland wrote: > Should be able to just roll your ports tree back to when it included > 5.1.X or manually update the couple of files required and then rebuild. > That said it may not be that which is causing your issue check to see if > you enhancing the memory sizes using the following, N.

Re: Setting X11BASE

Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On May 20, 2007 5:36:26 PM -0400 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:28:56PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> >>> If you can show me where the instructions are for UPDATING a headless >>> server that's not running xorg at all but has some

Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.1.18

Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 06:43:37PM -0400, Paul Laudanski wrote: >> I ugpraded from mysql 5.1.15 to 5.1.18 via portsupgrade, and now cannot >> run mysql. Errors: >> >> 070520 22:41:09 mysqld started >> 070520 22:41:09 [Warning] Server variable data_file_path of plugin >> Inn

Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.1.18

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 07:25:04PM -0400, Paul Laudanski wrote: > Steven Hartland wrote: > > Should be able to just roll your ports tree back to when it included > > 5.1.X or manually update the couple of files required and then rebuild. > > That said it may not be that which is causing your issue

math/miracl distfile size mismatch

Hello, math/miracl needs to be fixed: [root@ /usr/ports/math/miracl]# make install ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for miracl-5.23_3 => MD5 Checksum mismatch for miracl/5.23_3/miracl.zip. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for miracl/5.23_3/miracl.zip. ===> Refet

Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.1.18

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 07:25:04PM -0400, Paul Laudanski wrote: >> Steven Hartland wrote: >>> Should be able to just roll your ports tree back to when it included >>> 5.1.X or manually update the couple of files required and then rebuild. >>> That said it may not be that wh

Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.1.18

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 07:25:04PM -0400, Paul Laudanski wrote: >> Steven Hartland wrote: >>> Should be able to just roll your ports tree back to when it included >>> 5.1.X or manually update the couple of files required and then rebuild. >>> That said it may not be that wh

Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.1.18

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 07:25:04PM -0400, Paul Laudanski wrote: >> Steven Hartland wrote: >>> Should be able to just roll your ports tree back to when it included >>> 5.1.X or manually update the couple of files required and then rebuild. >>> That said it may not be that wh

Re: Speeding up pkg_version and perhaps other port utilities

On Sun, 20 May 2007, Doug Barton wrote: Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 19 May 2007 23:48:52 -0500): On my system, the program pkg_version can double its speed simply by replacing "make -V PKGNAME" by "make BEFOREPORTMK=yes -V PKGNAME"

Re: Setting X11BASE

--On May 21, 2007 12:24:47 AM +0100 Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: OK. They didn't work for me. [...] I've read all the email you sent twice and haven't found what was wrong. Can you be a little more specific or give error messages? Cause "blah fails" ju

Re: Speedup for make clean-depends (and thus make clean)

Hi, On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:01:49AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > I could write such a new target, e.g. limited-clean, which could be used > with update tools if there's some interest in something like this from > the author of such a tool. The patch below should get you going on this.

Re: Speedup for make clean-depends (and thus make clean)

This is the fastest one. It is about O(1) and takes a couple of seconds to delete files whether millions or billions. 1.) Set WRKDIRPREFIX like WRKDIRPREFIX=/ports in /etc/make.conf 2.) Give a device to it. It could be via mdconfig as well. For example, "mount /dev/ad0s2c /ports" 3.) Build whi

net-p2p/amule1

Hello! As we have dropped FreeBSD 4.x support from ports and also as EXPIRATION_DATE is reached for net-p2p/amule1 shouldn't we remove this port? With respect, Boris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l

Re: Speeding up pkg_version and perhaps other port utilities

Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On Sun, 20 May 2007, Doug Barton wrote: Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 19 May 2007 23:48:52 -0500): On my system, the program pkg_version can double its speed simply by replacing "make -V PKGNAME" by "m

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Doug Barton thusly... > > Parv wrote: > > > I am using FreeBSD 6. I haven't tried xorg 7.2 port(s) yet, but > > recently did merge /usr/X11R6 to /usr/local (programs reinstalled, > > made link to X11R6 to local, and such). On a reboot after that, > > script

Re: Speeding up pkg_version and perhaps other port utilities

Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On Sun, 20 May 2007, Doug Barton wrote: Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, 19 May 2007 23:48:52 -0500): On my system, the program pkg_version can double its speed simply by

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

On 2007-May-19 16:39:27 -0700, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Jeremy wrote: >> If you upgrade to xorg 7.2 but don't cleanup the /etc files then rc.d >> and periodic scripts are processe twice. > > Here is a lightly tested patch to rc.subr that should do the trick. If > someone wa

Re: X.org 7.2 ports merged into the FreeBSD Ports Tree

Parv wrote: in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Doug Barton thusly... Parv wrote: I am using FreeBSD 6. I haven't tried xorg 7.2 port(s) yet, but recently did merge /usr/X11R6 to /usr/local (programs reinstalled, made link to X11R6 to local, and such). On a reboot after that, scripts inde