Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

Le Sam 12 mai 07 à 16:46:11 +0200, Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : > The full log - an extract on my typescript) is available at > . > > No patch ATM, because the upgrade is still in progress... Actually I have no patches to sugges

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

I've installed everything by hand because I wanted to start with a clean slate. I've noticed the following problems: 1) xpdf sort of works but it's not possible to enter text into any text box. That means that e.g. searching in a PDF cannot be done. Luckily, acroread still works. 2) acidrip

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Quoting Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 18:14:01 -0400): > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:01 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > Ok chaps, I think I have it. > > > > This involves no recursive calls of make. Furthermore the > > dependencies > > it creates are the real depen

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

I can report success on three systems. A further system is still upgrading. In all cases, I had to execute multiple 'portupgrade -a' commands (and a few 'pkgdb -F' commands) to get it to work. One system mad a couple of problems with portupgrade apparently forgetting to re-install packages after

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

On 2007-May-17 11:02:31 +0200, Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >1) xpdf sort of works but it's not possible to enter text into any > text box. That means that e.g. searching in a PDF cannot be done. FWIW, xpdf works for me after an upgrade. -- Peter Jeremy pgpNRhBmRuwzH.pgp Descrip

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 17 May 2007 11:44:36 +0200): > For the difference between the redirected output case: I think the > gnome terminal needs a lot of time to print all the lines. But still, > the awk version takes around 3/4 of the time (interesting is the user >

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

Peter Jeremy wrote: One system had a couple of problems with portupgrade apparently forgetting to re-install packages after uninstalling them - which took a bit of cleaning up - and losing pieces of packages ('pkg_info -g' reported files missing). This is an annoying known issue http:

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

On Thu, 17 May 2007 21:17:27 +1000 Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-May-17 11:02:31 +0200, Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >1) xpdf sort of works but it's not possible to enter text into any > > text box. That means that e.g. searching in a PDF cannot be done. > >

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 18:14:01 -0400): On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:01 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Ok chaps, I think I have it. This involves no recursive calls of make. Furthermore the dependencies it creates are the r

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 17 May 2007 11:44:36 +0200): For the difference between the redirected output case: I think the gnome terminal needs a lot of time to print all the lines. But still, the awk version takes around 3/4 of the time (i

make -j patch

Hello, I have another version of the patch that allows multiple make jobs for a port build, please tell me what you think: http://www.maxlor.com/freebsd/files/make_jobs.diff I've abandoned the name PARALLEL_BUILD in favor of MAKE_JOBS since the former intuitively hints at several port builds r

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 17 May 2007 08:14:43 -0500): > Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 17 May 2007 11:44:36 > > +0200): > > > >> For the difference between the redirected output case: I think the > >> gnome

Re: when are the ports being unfrozen ?

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:09:33AM +0100, Craig Butler wrote: > Hi All > > Any news when the ports are being unfrozen ? Hopefully soon; there is at least one issue to be resolved (reports of GL failures). However I didn't see an X.org upgrade report from you yet. Did my mail server lose your em

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 16:01:56 -0500): > If I get some positive feedback on this one, I'll submit a PR. You can > try it out by typing "make actual-package-depends" as opposed to "make > package-depends." Did you my chance also had a look how t

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:32:35AM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le Sam 12 mai 07 ? 16:46:11 +0200, Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ?crivait?: > > > The full log - an extract on my typescript) is available at > > . > > > > No patch ATM, bec

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:43:11PM +0200, Angelo Turetta wrote: > Peter Jeremy wrote: > >One system had a couple > >of problems with portupgrade apparently forgetting to re-install > >packages after uninstalling them - which took a bit of cleaning up - > >and losing pieces of packages ('pkg_info -g

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

umm.. try to do it tonite jnielsendotnet:I would try this: # pkg_deinstall -f pango to remove the installed pango package(s) # cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/pango && make install clean to re-install it without portupgrade getting in the way # pkgdb -F so portupgrade can figure out what you

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 16:01:56 -0500): If I get some positive feedback on this one, I'll submit a PR. You can try it out by typing "make actual-package-depends" as opposed to "make package-depends." Did you

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

Another success story for the fire, I can report a successful upgrade on another machine -- upgrading the existing ports, not a clean install. Used portmaster instead of portupgrade and didn't run into any problems. I did take the slow and cautious route of upgrading a few of the ports at a time,

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

I upgraded from xorg-6.9 to xorg-7.2 on FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT (amd64) with success. Now I can use nv-driver instead of vesa-driver :-) Like Peter Jeremy I had to execute multiple 'portupgrade -a' commands. But two ports did not upgrade at all (math/xgobi and mail/thunderbird). Rainer Peter Je

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

Le Jeu 17 mai 07 à 18:54:36 +0200, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : > > Once tix has been upgraded, cad/opencascade failed: dps is no more > > pulled automatically, and it must be added as a dependence: > > I think the issue is that dps itself does not build correctly with > X.org 7.2

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

On Thu, 17 May 2007, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le Jeu 17 mai 07 à 18:54:36 +0200, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : Once tix has been upgraded, cad/opencascade failed: dps is no more pulled automatically, and it must be added as a dependence: I think the issue is that dps itself does

Saving old shared libs (Was: Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans)

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:06:59AM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le Lun 7 mai 07 ? 22:58:50 +0200, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?crivait?: The other problem is that if you're going to automatically update all the dependencies for a port, you need to upgrade all the st

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

Brian Gruber wrote: if you don't like the idea, that's fine, but since you say there's been no user demand, i just thought i should note that I tried portmaster a few months ago. while there were things i like, i ultimately switched back to portupgrade specifically because it lacked old library

Re: Saving old shared libs (Was: Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans)

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:06:02PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > At the same time, I think it's probably worthwhile to examine what the > goals of the ports system are in this regard. If the goal is to always > provide a fail-safe upgrade path for users then perhaps we should be > talking about m

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 16:01:56 -0500): If I get some positive feedback on this one, I'll submit a PR. You can try it out by typing "make actual-package-depends" as opposed to "make

Re: make -j patch

Benjamin Lutz píše v čt 17. 05. 2007 v 17:00 +0200: > ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS: Goes into a port's makefile. The port maintainer > indicates with it that the port can be built with multiple make > jobs. Nit: what about making this just MAKE_JOBS, for brevity? Otherwise it looks decent. -- Pav L

Specs for saving old shared libs

Doug Barton píše v čt 17. 05. 2007 v 13:06 -0700: > What might > be useful in this regard is if someone were to start a new thread > describing exactly what the desired behavior is, and ideally to > include a description of how portupgrade does it now. Just before old package deinstall, scan t

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

Hi All Two successful builds and installs, stock GENERIC 6.2-RELEASE, and SMP 6.2-RELEASE-p3 Like others I also had to run 'portupgrade -a' few times. Cheers CB Kris Kennaway wrote: > Dear porters, > > We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have > done extensive tests o

Re: make -j patch

On Thursday 17 May 2007 23:26, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Benjamin Lutz píše v čt 17. 05. 2007 v 17:00 +0200: > > ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS: Goes into a port's makefile. The port maintainer > > indicates with it that the port can be built with multiple make > > jobs. > > Nit: what about making this just

FreeBSD Port: festival-1.96

Maybe you can tell me what I'm doing wrong. On a fresh copy of FreeBSD 6.2 i386 I complied festival 1.96 (and tried 1.95beta1 with the same results), installed a voice, and tried the saytime script. It failed with an error msg: SIOD ERROR: unbound variable : ¼ The last character changes every tim

FreeBSD Port: security/expiretable

Hello, FreeBSD ns2.domain.com 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Thu May 17 22:10:51 UTC 2007 I see these errors. messages.c: In function `error': messages.c:34: warning: ISO C does not support the `%m' printf format messages.c: In function `warning': messages.c:52: warning: ISO C does not suppo

vlock: new upstream maintainer

Hi, I just wanted to inform you that I am the new upstream maintainer of the vlock package. I got hold of the original author, Michael Johnson [1], and wanted to send him some patches. Instead he suggested that I take up maintenance because he hadn't looked at the sources for a long time himself.

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

Hello, I tested on a clean amd64-current, using portugrade-devel. portupgrade -R xorg\* dies in graphics/libGL (probably related to the recent changes in the thread-libraries; for some reason /usr/lib/libpthread.so is considered 'incompatible' ) : ../../../bin/mklib -o GL -linker 'cc' \

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

follow-up to myself [ Cc to current@ since per se this seems not related to the xorg7.2 update ]: launcing the final link command by hand and hardcoding /lib/libthr.so.2, I get : cc -shared -Wl,-soname,libGL.so.1 -o libGL.so.1 glcontextmodes.o clientattrib.o compsize.o eval.o glxcmds.o glxext.o

[ports]: VERY SERIOUS security bug in ports/sysutils/eject

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2007-May/120117.html http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=112754 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 17 May 2007 15:58:38 -0500): Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 16 May 2007 16:01:56 -0500): If I get some positive feedback on this one, I'