Cheers,
I'm struggeling with setting up Apache 2.2 and mod_auth_pam to
authenticate an BasicAuth directory against my local unix users.
Apache is using PAM in so far as when I have his /etc/pam.d/httpd config:
auth required pam_permit.so debug
accountrequired pam_permit.so
While doing some pruning on my ports I noticed these:
docbook-1.3: ok
docbook-241_2: ok
docbook-3.0_2: ok
docbook-3.1_2: ok
docbook-4.0_2: ok
docbook-4.1_2: ok
docbook-4.2: ok
docbook-xml-4.2_1: ok
docbook-xml-4.3: ok
docbook-xml-4.4: ok
Do I _really_ need all those versions of docbook(-xml) ? Is
> Once in a while a port fails to upgrade, because it wants to write
> something in /etc. E.g. perl into /etc/make.conf or other ports into
> /etc/group.
>
> On my systems / is normally a read only mount. These ports build fine
> during a portupgrade and fail during install, leaving most of the por
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:59:19 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I guess one of those libraries needs to be rebuilt.
> >
> > grep -r /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib
> >
> > should show you the files that need to be rebuilt. pkg_which will
> > help you to figure out which
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..gaim-hotkeys-0.2.2:
"/local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/net-im/gaim-devel" non-existent -- dependency
list incomplete
===> net-im/gaim-hotkeys failed
*** Error code 1
*** Error code 1
Stop in /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports.
*** Error
On 5/3/07, Jonathan Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm struggeling with setting up Apache 2.2 and mod_auth_pam to
authenticate an BasicAuth directory against my local unix users.
I'm using pam authentication with apache 2.2. We mostly use radius for
authentication but here is my config:
Alejandro Pulver wrote:
The reason AFAIK is the lack of cache for block devices, which was
(re)added in FreeBSD-CURRENT (7.x).
I don't think something like that cache has been added in -CURRENT.
AFAIK things are still the same as in 6.x.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..gaim-hotkeys-0.2.2:
"/local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/net-im/gaim-devel" non-existent -- dependency
list incomplete
===> net-im/gaim-hotkeys failed
*** Error code 1
*** Error code 1
Stop in /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports.
*** Error
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Garrett Cooper wrote:
[snipped]
It's missing a dependency. Look at the original source's website because
it may offer some clues as to what package(s) is/are required to compile
vlc against.
Thanks for the hint, but I couldn't find any information on required
libraries as the vlc-folks ha
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
thanks,
MC
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
mal content wrote:
>> /usr/local
>
> Hello.
>
> Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
>
> thanks,
> MC
A version dependant directory structure hasn't been a good idea in the first
place. No one was really able to tell weather to put a port into /usr/X11R6 or
/usr/local anyway
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:47PM +0100, mal content wrote:
> >/usr/local
>
> Hello.
>
> Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
/usr/local is the new de facto standard, AFAIK no-one is using
/usr/X11R7.
Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:32:28AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:59:19 Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > > I guess one of those libraries needs to be rebuilt.
> > >
> > > grep -r /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib
> > >
> > > should show you the files that
On 03/05/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:47PM +0100, mal content wrote:
> >/usr/local
>
> Hello.
>
> Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
/usr/local is the new de facto standard, AFAIK no-one is using
/usr/X11R7.
Kris
Oh, OK.
thank
On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly others
> > > > need them too but did not have this problem, only
> > >
> > > No, it's because something is stale on your system and needs to be
> > > rebuilt.
> >
> > I don
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:43:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly others
> > > > > need them too but did not have this problem, only
> > > >
> > > > No, it's because somethin
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:00:24 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:43:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly
> > > > > > others need them too but did not have th
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:14:58PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:00:24 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:43:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > > On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > > I guess this is a port configuration problem be
On Thursday 03 May 2007 19:12:45 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> mal content wrote:
> >> /usr/local
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
> >
> > thanks,
> > MC
>
> A version dependant directory structure hasn't been a good idea in the
> first place. No one was really
Danny Pansters writes:
> /usr/X11R6 was a long standing bug about to be fixed once and for
> all. IIRC it originated from fixed paths in the old XFree. It
> won't be missed or mourned :)
While I understand why this is going to happen, I've been of
the opinion it ought to be retained wi
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > >
> > > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in some
> > > > port configurations
> > >
> > > OK, I was willing to help you figure this out, but you've ignored my
> > > instructions 3 times now, so I'm giving up
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:37 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Danny Pansters writes:
>
> > /usr/X11R6 was a long standing bug about to be fixed once and for
> > all. IIRC it originated from fixed paths in the old XFree. It
> > won't be missed or mourned :)
>
> While I understand why this is go
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:24:41PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in some
> > > > > port configurations
> > > >
> > > > OK, I was willing to help you figure this out
On Thursday 03 May 2007 17:34:04 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:24:41PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in
> > > > > > some port configurations
> > > > >
> >
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:06PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 03 May 2007 17:34:04 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:24:41PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > > On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is s
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Rong-en Fan thusly...
>
> On 5/3/07, Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Apparently teTeX development/support ended on May 2006
> > (according to http://www.tug.org/tetex/)
...
> > Will there be any Tex Live port in our future? I did not find
> > anything suit
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 00:10 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 02 May 2007 18:53:22 -0400
> Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > I’m getting the following error when using portmanager:
> > >
> > > barge# /u
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I’m getting the following error when using portmanager:
>
> barge# /usr/local/bin/portmanager -ui
> rParseCommandLine 0.4.1_9 error: /usr/ports/-ui is not a valid port
> directory
> rParseCommandLine 0.4.1_9 info:either you h
Hello,
SDL_gui has moved from:
http://www.newimage.com/~rhk/SDL_gui
to:
http://rhk.dataslab.com/SDL_gui
Thanks!
-Ray
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
I will be freezing the ports tree in 15 minutes in preparation for the
X.Org 7.2 merge. The merge will not happen right away. Instead, we
will enter a period of testing as per Kris' email. During this freeze
only portmgr, and those working on the X.Org merge will be allowed to
commit.
Joe
--
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:47 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> I will be freezing the ports tree in 15 minutes in preparation for the
> X.Org 7.2 merge. The merge will not happen right away. Instead, we
> will enter a period of testing as per Kris' email. During this freeze
> only portmgr, and th
32 matches
Mail list logo
