[wine] can't run /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found

2007-04-17 Thread regisr
Hi, When I launch wine just build from ports tree (cvsup yesterday) installed with portupgrade, I have the following error message: ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found But the lib is in right place... It is the only program which can't run! %ls -l /libexec//ld* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root

Mailman virtual-mailman.db

2007-04-17 Thread Vizion
I am missing something in facilitating the creation of virtual-mailman.db. I get the failure line in maillog fatal: open database /usr/local/mailman/data/virtual-mailman.db I have gonne through the docs but am obviously missing something. Could anyone please let me know: 1. How virtual-mailman.

ports/111417 [PATCH] security/vscan: Update update_dat for >5000 dat Files

2007-04-17 Thread Larry Rosenman
Can I interest a committer in a quick patch? ports/111417[PATCH] security/vscan: Update update_dat for >5000 dat files This patches the update_dat script to deal with version numbers greater than 5000, which happened a couple of weeks ago. Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman

portupgrade -s broken in portupgrade 2.2.6

2007-04-17 Thread James
hihi. Is portupgrade -s still supported and/or known to be working in portupgrade 2.2.6? Currently I have two machines using portupgrade 2.2.6 all my others are using pre-2.0 versions. The new machines show this problem. The old ones work fine. If I do a "portupgrade -vsb portname" it'll term

Re: Mailman virtual-mailman.db

2007-04-17 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:29 AM, Vizion wrote: I am missing something in facilitating the creation of virtual- mailman.db. I get the failure line in maillog fatal: open database /usr/local/mailman/data/virtual-mailman.db I have gonne through the docs but am obviously missing something. Could an

Re: Re: Mailman virtual-mailman.db

2007-04-17 Thread Vizion
> > From: Jeffrey Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/04/17 Tue AM 08:51:42 PDT > To: Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: > Subject: Re: Mailman virtual-mailman.db > > On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:29 AM, Vizion wrote: > > > I am missing something in facilitating the creation of virtual- > > mailm

How to clean ...

2007-04-17 Thread regisr
How to delete old files, I have the list in the pkg-plist and I wan to delete files older than a specified date which are in the list? I can't re-install because it can upgrade files which I wan to keed (newer than the date). Does an utility do this? -- regis _

Re: [wine] can't run /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found

2007-04-17 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:24:25 +0200 regisr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I launch wine just build from ports tree (cvsup yesterday) > installed with portupgrade, I have the following error message: > ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found > But the lib is in right place... It is the on

Re: Mailman virtual-mailman.db

2007-04-17 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Apr 17, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Vizion wrote: From: Jeffrey Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:29 AM, Vizion wrote: I get the failure line in maillog fatal: open database /usr/local/mailman/data/virtual-mailman.db To create these files the first time, run /usr/local

mailman

2007-04-17 Thread David Southwell
I am having problems getting /data/virtual-mailman.db created. Here are the errors I am getting from maillog: Apr 17 05:09:23 dns1 postfix/master[687]: reload configuration /usr/local/etc/postfix Apr 17 05:09:34 dns1 postfix/cleanup[3738]: fatal: open database /usr/local/mailman/data/virtual

Re: mailman

2007-04-17 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Apr 17, 2007, at 5:14 AM, David Southwell wrote: Could anyone please tell me what I need to check, the process by which virtual-mailman.db is created. If possible an example from the relevant config files would be really appreciated. There should be a file called virtual-mailman which con

grace 5.1.21 port

2007-04-17 Thread Xavier Otazu
Hello: I do not know if this e-mail account is a mail-list or a personal e-mail. Anyway, I woul like to say to the maintainer of this port to upgrade it to the newest recent version, i.e. 5.1.21. Thanks a lot for your work! cheers Xavier ___

Re: portupgrade -s broken in portupgrade 2.2.6

2007-04-17 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
James wrote: > hihi. Is portupgrade -s still supported and/or known to be working in > portupgrade 2.2.6? Currently I have two machines using portupgrade > 2.2.6 all my others are using pre-2.0 versions. The new machines show > this problem. The old ones work fine. > Well, I don't know where

upgrade Gimp does work like mentioned in UPDATING

2007-04-17 Thread Heino Tiedemann
hi, Problem "Gimp". in UPDATING: , | 20070404: | AFFECTS: users of graphics/gimp and graphics/gimp-devel | AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | The gimp[-devel] port is now a meta-port so users will need to upgrade via | one of the following examples. Gimp now depends on gutenprint inste

Re: mailman

2007-04-17 Thread David Southwell
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 09:55:38 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Apr 17, 2007, at 5:14 AM, David Southwell wrote: > > Could anyone please tell me what I need to check, the process by which > > virtual-mailman.db is created. If possible an example from the > > relevant > > config files would be really app

Re: [wine] can't run /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found

2007-04-17 Thread regisr
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:58:19 +0900 Norikatsu Shigemura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > It's well-known problem. The maximum hard-limit data size > (kern.maxdsiz) is too big (over about 1GB). So you may set > kern.maxdsiz=805306368 to your /boot/loader.conf. Thanks. It is workin

Utility for safe updating of ports in base system

2007-04-17 Thread Adam Stroud
All: I was just on the FreeBSD "list of projects and ideas fot volunteers" page and I was wondering if anyone was working on the "portupgrade in C" utility. I would be willing to help (code/document/test) if it's needed. A -- Adam P. Stroud Intelligent Systems Division BAE Systems, Advanced I

Re: [wine] can't run /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found

2007-04-17 Thread regisr
> It's well-known problem. The maximum hard-limit data size > (kern.maxdsiz) is too big (over about 1GB). So you may set > kern.maxdsiz=805306368 to your /boot/loader.conf. Ok I find the following PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94413 May be this info should be

Re: Utility for safe updating of ports in base system

2007-04-17 Thread RW
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:31:39 -0400 Adam Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just on the FreeBSD "list of projects and ideas fot volunteers" > page and I was wondering if anyone was working on the "portupgrade in > C" utility. I would be willing to help (code/document/test) if it's > needed

Re: Utility for safe updating of ports in base system

2007-04-17 Thread Robert Backhaus
On 4/18/07, Adam Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All: I was just on the FreeBSD "list of projects and ideas fot volunteers" page and I was wondering if anyone was working on the "portupgrade in C" utility. I would be willing to help (code/document/test) if it's needed. I think that some pro

Re: upgrade Gimp does work like mentioned in UPDATING

2007-04-17 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Tuesday, 17. April 2007, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > hi, > > > Problem "Gimp". > > in UPDATING: > > > , > > | 20070404: > | AFFECTS: users of graphics/gimp and graphics/gimp-devel > | AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > | The gimp[-devel] port is now a meta-port so users will need to upgrade

Re: Utility for safe updating of ports in base system

2007-04-17 Thread Garrett Cooper
RW wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:31:39 -0400 Adam Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was just on the FreeBSD "list of projects and ideas fot volunteers" page and I was wondering if anyone was working on the "portupgrade in C" utility. I would be willing to help (code/document/test) if it's n

Tracking port and package flags/options

2007-04-17 Thread James E. Flemer
[Please maintain CC.] Here are some patches to the FreeBSD package tools, and the ports infrastructure to track make flags/options used to build a port/package. I've been using these changes locally for something like 2-3 years. This greatly helps me manage packages across several machines, a

Re: Utility for safe updating of ports in base system

2007-04-17 Thread Karel Miklav
Robert Backhaus wrote: On 4/18/07, Adam Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The current consensus is that portmaster, which is a collection of sh scripts, should be further developed and eventually committed to the base system. The developer of portmaster is one of those who does not really like