-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello group,
what alternative can I use insted of the port scheduled for deletion:
portname: security/cyrus-sasl
description:RFC SASL (Simple Authentication and Security
Layer)
maintainer: [EMAIL PROT
On 4/3/07, Anton Blajev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello group,
what alternative can I use insted of the port scheduled for deletion:
portname: security/cyrus-sasl
description:RFC SASL (Simple Authentication and Security
Layer)
maintainer: [EMA
I've submitted a PR with an update: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-
pr.cgi?pr=79
Thanks
Nick
On Mar 31, 2007, at 11:42 PM, Thomas Schürmann wrote:
Hello,
From otrs.org
2007-03-05 OTRS 2.1.6 (Playa Esmeralda) is released!
Can you make an update?
greetings
_
I am having trouble finding documentation that goes in more detail
then that of the handbook. I am sending this message in hopes that you
may be able to point me in the right direction, or know of a better way
to accomplish this.
I am setting up a single server as a 'build box' for our freebs
* Rong-En Fan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> After pav@'s commit to bsd.port.mk, now you can test WITH/WITHOUT
> freely with OPTIONS. Also, when the set of OPTIONS is changed, users
> will be prompted to the dialog again (thank you pav!).
So good, thanks a lot pav!
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Maraka
Dan Casey píše v út 03. 04. 2007 v 11:42 -0400:
> I am setting up a single server as a 'build box' for our freebsd
> servers. We want to build our own packages because
> 1. we may need to compile certain ports with different flags then
> freebsd chooses.
> 2. We want to update ports only when nee
Quoting Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:04:25 +0200):
> Dan Casey píše v út 03. 04. 2007 v 11:42 -0400:
>
> > I am setting up a single server as a 'build box' for our freebsd
> > servers. We want to build our own packages because
> > 1. we may need to compile certain ports
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:42:20 -0400
Dan Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having trouble finding documentation that goes in more detail
> then that of the handbook. I am sending this message in hopes that
> you may be able to point me in the right direction, or know of a
> better way to
Dan Casey wrote:
> ...
>
> What I'm setting up is a regular ports tree (/usr/ports) which is Not
> updated. Then a second tree /usr/local/current-ports which is updated
> daily with portsnap.
Packages make this kind of messing unnecessary. Having an up to date ports tree
doesn't force you to up
The Directory of Clubrural.com Tourism invites to you to interchange a
connection if these interested beam click but down
http://www.clubrural.com/links/
El Directorio de Turismo Clubrural.com te invita a intercambiar un enlace si
estas interesado haz click mas abajo
http://www.clubrural.com/l
postfix 2.4 is out, if you don't take a stab it, we might look at what
it needs for freebsd ports next week sometime.
if you have experimental patches in the mean time, feel free to send
them to us to test.
_
This email
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> postfix 2.4 is out, if you don't take a stab it, we might look at what
> it needs for freebsd ports next week sometime.
I'm working on that.
Possible patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mnag/postfix.patch
Regards
>
> if you have experimental patches in the mean time,
On 2007/04/03 14:12, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> After pav@'s commit to bsd.port.mk, now you can test WITH/WITHOUT
> freely with OPTIONS.
I filed a PR ports/78343 with similar patch, but the PR was rejected.
Why the policy has been changed?
--
NIIMI Satoshi
_
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:52:57AM +0900, NIIMI Satoshi wrote:
> On 2007/04/03 14:12, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> > After pav@'s commit to bsd.port.mk, now you can test WITH/WITHOUT
> > freely with OPTIONS.
>
> I filed a PR ports/78343 with similar patch, but the PR was rejected.
> Why the policy has bee
On 4/4/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
===
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
In file included from
/usr/local/include/libgnome-2.0/libgnome/gnome-program.h:41,
from /usr/local/include/libgnome-2.0/libgn
On 4/4/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:52:57AM +0900, NIIMI Satoshi wrote:
> On 2007/04/03 14:12, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> > After pav@'s commit to bsd.port.mk, now you can test WITH/WITHOUT
> > freely with OPTIONS.
>
> I filed a PR ports/78343 with similar pat
16 matches
Mail list logo
