Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: net/py-pypcap

On 四, 3 08, 2007 at 17:01:11 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:21:43 - (UTC), > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > 1) update the PCS port to grab my version > > > > I think this is the ideal way to handle the situation. Only caveat > > on your end is your modified pyp

gnome-vfs-2.16.3 -> stale dependency question

running pkgdb -F I am getting **Stale lock file was found. Removed Stale dependency: gnome-vfs-2.16.3 ->geimdal-0.7.2_2 (security/heimdal Install stale dependency? What is the appropriate response? Yes would result in an attempt to install heimdal which is not practical due to conflict with krb

Re: Moving applications from to

Hello, * Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Last year Kris made a list of applications that still make use of > : > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2006-June/064010.html I took a look at all the ports in the list, except the internationalized ones (Japanese, etc)

pkgdb -F --guidance

Hi I seem to contimually struggle with how to use pkgdb -F. I really do not understand how to determine what responses I need to give to the various prompts provided by pkgdb. Is there a guide anywhere - if not would someone be kind enough to inform me and maybe we could add it to the section

RE: (no subject)

> >> They will? Why? > >> While there's no reason to think they want to gratuitously > >> create bad feelings, FreeBSD machines are a small fraction of the > >> current (and potential) user base. They could blow off FreeBSD - > >> heck, *BSD - first thing tomorrow and not notice. > >>

print/freetype2 broken?

Trying to upgrade my ports using portmanager(1) but it seems to think that print/freetype2 is not installed - even after it gets built and installed: /home/mark{122}# portmanager -s [snip] 7 :freetype2-2.2.1_1 /print/freetype2 MISSING [snip] /home/mark{123}# ls -ld /var/db/p

Re: pkgupgrade

Dear Michel, On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:59:25PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote: > this is to announce version 1.2 of pkgupgrade, a python tool aimed at > upgrading freebsd ports installations mainly using binary packages. > It has a companion program pkg_save.py by Cyrille Szymanski which > performs ba

Re: pkgdb -F --guidance

Vizion wrote: Hi I seem to contimually struggle with how to use pkgdb -F. I really do not understand how to determine what responses I need to give to the various prompts provided by pkgdb. Is there a guide anywhere - if not would someone be kind enough to inform me and maybe we could add it

Re: pkgdb -F --guidance

Garrett Cooper wrote: Vizion wrote: Hi I seem to contimually struggle with how to use pkgdb -F. I really do not understand how to determine what responses I need to give to the various prompts provided by pkgdb. Is there a guide anywhere - if not would someone be kind enough to inform me and

Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

Vizion wrote: They will? Why? While there's no reason to think they want to gratuitously create bad feelings, FreeBSD machines are a small fraction of the current (and potential) user base. They could blow off FreeBSD - heck, *BSD - first thing tomorrow and not notice. OpenOffice.Or

Pushing for default jdk / jre to become java/diablo-j{dk,re}

Hello all, I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group -- could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged versions because frankly I don't want a system to assume that I want to compile the 1.5 jdk / jre from scratch by first installing the linux v1.4.2 of th

Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

Garrett Cooper wrote: Vizion wrote: They will? Why? While there's no reason to think they want to gratuitously create bad feelings, FreeBSD machines are a small fraction of the current (and potential) user base. They could blow off FreeBSD - heck, *BSD - first thing tomorrow and not no

Re: Pushing for default jdk / jre to become java/diablo-j{dk,re}

On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hello all, > I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group -- > could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged versions > because frankly I don't want a system to assume that I want to compile

Re: Pushing for default jdk / jre to become java/diablo-j{dk,re}

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: Hello all, I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group -- could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged versions because frankly I don't want a system to assume that I want

Re: Pushing for default jdk / jre to become java/diablo-j{dk,re}

Garrett Cooper wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: Hello all, I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group -- could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged versions because frankly I don't want a sy

Re: Pushing for default jdk / jre to become java/diablo-j{dk,re}

On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hello all, > I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group -- > could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged versions > because frankly I don't want a system to assume that I want to compile

A list of possible ports that require www/mozilla

A did a (more) expensive ports tree walk and I found a partial list of ports which may require www/mozilla (or need to be modified appropriately to support globally required mozilla properties). The file is available at . Also, the

Re: Pushing for default jdk / jre to become java/diablo-j{dk,re}

Gary Kline writes: > >I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a > > group -- could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo > > packaged versions because frankly I don't want a system to assume > > that I want to compile the 1.5 jdk / jre from scratch by first > > in

Re: Pushing for default jdk / jre to become java/diablo-j{dk,re}

On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:22:08PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Garrett Cooper wrote: > >Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >>>Hello all, > >>>I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group > >>>-- could push to make t

INDEX build failed for 5.x

INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..make: chdir /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/www/jakarta-tomcat41: No such file or directory "Makefile", line 44: warning: "make -C /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/www/jakarta-tomcat41 -VAPP_HOME" returned non-zero status ja-xgate-3.

Re: INDEX build failed for 5.x

Erwin Lansing wrote: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..make: chdir /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/www/jakarta-tomcat41: No such file or directory "Makefile", line 44: warning: "make -C /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/www/jakarta-tomcat41 -VAPP_HOME" returned non-z

Re: INDEX build failed for 5.x

> Erwin Lansing wrote: > [...] > 5.x isn't supported anymore. Kris has sent a few emails to this list > over the past couple weeks about this. > > -Garrett Guess portmgr member would notice? ;) We still support 5.5-R and 5-STABLE for ports. -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: INDEX build failed for 5.x

Sam Lawrance wrote: On 18/03/2007, at 9:17 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: Erwin Lansing wrote: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..make: chdir /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/www/jakarta-tomcat41: No such file or directory "Makefile", line 44: warning: "make -C /loc

Re: INDEX build failed for 5.x

Erwin Lansing schrieb: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..make: chdir /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/www/jakarta-tomcat41: No such file or directory "Makefile", line 44: warning: "make -C /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/www/jakarta-tomcat41 -VAPP_HOME" returned non

Re: A list of possible ports that require www/mozilla

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:03:30 -0500, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A did a (more) expensive ports tree walk and I found a partial list of ports which may require www/mozilla (or need to be modified appropriately to support globally required mozilla properties). The file is avai

Re: A list of possible ports that require www/mozilla

Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:03:30 -0500, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A did a (more) expensive ports tree walk and I found a partial list of ports which may require www/mozilla (or need to be modified appropriately to support globally required mozilla propertie

INDEX now builds successfully on 5.x

___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: A list of possible ports that require www/mozilla

Garrett Cooper wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:03:30 -0500, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A did a (more) expensive ports tree walk and I found a partial list of ports which may require www/mozilla (or need to be modified appropriately to support globally req

Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

Garrett Cooper wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: Vizion wrote: They will? Why? While there's no reason to think they want to gratuitously create bad feelings, FreeBSD machines are a small fraction of the current (and potential) user base. They could blow off FreeBSD - heck, *BSD - first th

Re: INDEX build failed for 5.x

On 18/03/2007, at 9:17 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: Erwin Lansing wrote: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..make: chdir /local0/tmp/erwin/ tindex/ports/www/jakarta-tomcat41: No such file or directory "Makefile", line 44: warning: "make -C /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/

Re: A list of possible ports that require www/mozilla

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:04:28 -0500, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:03:30 -0500, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A did a (more) expensive ports tree walk and I found a partial list of ports which ma