On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:50:10 -0600
Michael Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Greetings,
>
> I am writing to report a possible bug with the installation of zabbix
> from ports. Is ucd-snmp required when net-snmp is already installed?
> There is no switch to install without ucd-snmp.
>
>
> F
Seems to work fine for my setup, I recently switched from i386 to amd64
and it worked ok.
No compile errors (only warnings)
runs smoothly on 6.2p1-amd64
sincerely yours,
Steve Clement
--
__o | Steve Clement - Unix System Administrator
_ \<,_ | Current Location: Luxembourgr/Europe
Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:45:01 +0900, Artem Kazakov wrote:
> Hello guys,
> here is the patch to upgrade nss_ldap port to current version 255
Commited. Thanks!
--
Andrey Slusar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all, and hi Doug.
PR was submitted about it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=110125
And thanks for great program. :)
- --
Best regards,
Simon Phoenix (Phoenix Lab.)
- ---
K
FYI, we have ncurses wide character support in 7.x now.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rong-En Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mar 9, 2007 8:11 PM
Subject: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/lib/ncurses Makefile
config.mk src/lib/ncurses/form Makefile src/lib/ncurses/formw Makefile
sr
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:56:17 +0700 Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:37:00PM -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> > >Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > >> I've found that you do get a worthwhile improvement in dump|restore
> > >> performance by introducing a large (10's of MB) fifo between them
On, Fri Mar 09, 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> FYI, we have ncurses wide character support in 7.x now.
[...]
Great work, thanks a lot. Will it be backported to RELENG_6?
Regards
Marcus
pgpqN55PfGFQF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:49:09PM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On, Fri Mar 09, 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
>
> > FYI, we have ncurses wide character support in 7.x now.
> [...]
>
> Great work, thanks a lot. Will it be backported to RELENG_6?
Same question I had. I'd love to see this backporte
On 3/9/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:49:09PM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On, Fri Mar 09, 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
>
> > FYI, we have ncurses wide character support in 7.x now.
> [...]
>
> Great work, thanks a lot. Will it be backported to RELENG_6?
I've portsnapped my servers (some are 6.1R, 6.2 Prerelease, 6.2 Beta2
etc) to get the lasted zoneinfo port. Prior to this I tested the
timezone info using
zdump -v /etc/localtime | grep 2007 , the test showed I had old DST
information. I installed the port without issue and re-ran the tzsetup
a
Moving this thread from the cvs lists ...
The problem described in
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104877 is now causing
significant issues for our users due to the recent libgpg-error
version bump.
Can we have some response from Ade, and/or portmgr on when this might
be fixed? I would
On Mar 09, 2007, at 14:21 , Doug Barton wrote:
Can we have some response from Ade, and/or portmgr on when this might
be fixed? I would agree that the current behavior is suboptimal.
I'm pretty certain that this has been addressed with recent updates
to devel/libtool15 and devel/libltdl15 --
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=editors&portname=abiword-plugins
i386 and amd64 builds are "failing" as though something were forcing
USE_AUTOTOOLS= libtool:15
and bypassing the included libtool. What's the difference?
% ${WRKSRC}/libtool --features
host: i386-portbld-freeb
Ade Lovett wrote:
>
> On Mar 09, 2007, at 14:21 , Doug Barton wrote:
>> Can we have some response from Ade, and/or portmgr on when this might
>> be fixed? I would agree that the current behavior is suboptimal.
>
> I'm pretty certain that this has been addressed with recent updates to
> devel/libt
Rong-en Fan wrote:
> FYI, we have ncurses wide character support in 7.x now.
Congratulations! This is a significant step forward.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
Spil Oss wrote:
> I'd like to submit the patch in a PR, but I don't know (yet :D) how to
> include the removal of a file from the port (that patch-file is now
> already included in the distributed sources).
This works best for me:
- Use a cvs mirror
- Install ports-mgmt/porttools
- Checkout the po
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:34:31 -0800
Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 09, 2007, at 14:21 , Doug Barton wrote:
> > Can we have some response from Ade, and/or portmgr on when this might
> > be fixed? I would agree that the current behavior is suboptimal.
>
> I'm pretty certain that this h
On Mar 09, 2007, at 15:14 , Doug Barton wrote:
Ade Lovett wrote:
So, item (1): does the problem actually still exist with a port using
the in-tree devel/libtool15 (via USE_AUTOTOOLS= libtool:15[:env]. If
yes, empirical evidence will be required as an addendum to the
PR. If
no, then we're
Cna you please tell me how to download this software
hugin-0.6.1
I can't downlod the software and instal it!..
please help me
ernesto
___
Do You Yahoo!?
La mejor conexión a Internet y 2GB extra a t
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:05:31 -0800
Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 09, 2007, at 15:14 , Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > Ade Lovett wrote:
> >> So, item (1): does the problem actually still exist with a port using
> >> the in-tree devel/libtool15 (via USE_AUTOTOOLS= libtool:15[:env]. If
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 09, 2007, at 17:30 , Jean-Yves Lefort wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:05:31 -0800
Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3. Ports that *are* affected by this issue (assuming the issue still
exists) can be fixed in a more relaxed manner (eg: a c
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:56:52 -0800
Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 09, 2007, at 17:30 , Jean-Yves Lefort wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:05:31 -0800
> > Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 3. Ports that *are* affected by this issue (assuming the issue still
> >> exists) can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 09, 2007, at 18:30 , Jean-Yves Lefort wrote:
I told you there is one.
You have stated there to be a problem. I am still waiting for
quantifiable evidence. I have not received any so far.
That's right, thousands of commits are more el
Garrett
What user are you running spamassassin as?
-Garrett
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hmm, even modifying it to use /var/log/F
Vizion wrote:
How do I get out of the following loop!
:
I run
# pkgdb -f
Then try
# portupgrade -a
and get
Stale dependency . manuall run 'pkgdb -F to fix or specify -O to force
I run
# pkgdb -O
then run
# portupgrade -a
and get
Stale dependencies ..manually run 'pkgdb -F' to f
Ade Lovett wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 09, 2007, at 17:30 , Jean-Yves Lefort wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:05:31 -0800
Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3. Ports that *are* affected by this issue (assuming the issue still
exists) can be fixed in a more rela
On Mar 09, 2007, at 22:47 , Doug Barton wrote:
On it's face I find the idea of bumping PORTREVISION for every port
that uses libtool in any form a sort of silly proposition. The
change in behavior was introduced in Mk/*, I think it's reasonable
to expect that the fix happen there too.
Ok.
27 matches
Mail list logo
