Re: multimedia/kbtv: broken saa kmod?

2007-02-15 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi Danny, On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:36:17 +0100 Danny Pansters wrote: > I don't see this happening but I did get other (casting) errors that gcc > calls > warnings. Start with a fresh make extract then put the attached diffs in > kbtv_wrksrc_dir/saa/patches/ That did it! The kernel module works

Re: default postgresql 7.4 -> 8.1, OK?

2007-02-15 Thread Ivan Voras
Ade Lovett wrote: > 8.2.x isn't really stable enough yet for Joe User to pick it up when > they want postgresql support for random-port. Agreed. Also, I know it doesn't concern many users, but until it gets the ICU patch it's mostly unusable to me. :( signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digi

Problems w/apache22 & php5 running at 100%

2007-02-15 Thread Jakob Breivik Grimstveit
Fellow geeks; After having upgraded to php5.2.1 via ports my server is constantly running at 100%, from about 5-10% earlier: $ ps auxwwf -ru | head -5 USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND www 4596 47,9 2,2 33956 22880 ?? R 1:34pm 1:13,25 /usr

ParaView3 build and Qt4...

2007-02-15 Thread fred
Hi all, I'm trying to build ParaView3 (2.9.8) on my freebsd box (6.2). I have successfully built Qt 4.2.2 and cmake 2.4.6. But when I run cmake to configure PV3, it complains about something missing related to Qt4 and X11 if I understand right: QT_X11_QMAKESPEC_LIBRARY QT_X11_QMAKESPEC_LIBRARY

Re: FreeBSD Port: amanda-client-2.5.1p3,1

2007-02-15 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:19:13AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > Thank you for your investigation. I've committed your patch into our > repository. I just checked the amanda subversion repository and it looks like they made the same fix 3 days ago, so the patch should be able to go away at the nex

Re: ParaView3 build and Qt4...

2007-02-15 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Thursday, 15. February 2007 15:59, fred wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to build ParaView3 (2.9.8) on my freebsd box (6.2). > > I have successfully built Qt 4.2.2 and cmake 2.4.6. > > But when I run cmake to configure PV3, it complains about something > missing related to Qt4 and X11 if I unders

Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?

2007-02-15 Thread youshi10
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Michel Talon wrote: Give me a few weeks, and if I can band together with a few people I wanted to try and port sections of portupgrade and its related tools to C++ (and maybe do some code tweaks along the way). Most of the ruby files are over 400 lines long, sparsely comment

Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?

2007-02-15 Thread Csaba Molnar
2007. February 15. 19.17 dátummal [EMAIL PROTECTED] ezt írta: > > > > Compare that to the situation for Debian apt-get. The names are > > conserved. They have strict rules about package naming, they stick to > > them and don't change them arbitrarily. All packages exist in compiled > > form, you d

Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?

2007-02-15 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:17:00 -0600, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: = Pros: = -It's written in python (portable). Isn't our more portable for hardware than Python? Also, it is smaller? -It's a system which focuses on ports compilation from source, not binary package installation. This

Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?

2007-02-15 Thread Doug Barton
Michel Talon wrote: > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > >> Well, the complexity is somewhere in the area of O(nm) with m being >> small. I strongly suggest some basic bucket hashing if it is not done >> already. For the pkgsrc bulk build (which has similiar problems) it >> reduced the time to around 3 m

portmaster and local ports (Was: Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?)

2007-02-15 Thread Doug Barton
David Gilbert wrote: >> "Jeremy" == Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jeremy> Give ports-mgmt/portmaster a try. > > I just did. One flaw it has is that I have two no longer supported > ports installed. What do you mean by "no longer supported?" > I want to run portmaster -a

Re: portmaster and local ports (Was: Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?)

2007-02-15 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:54:29 -0600, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Gilbert wrote: "Jeremy" == Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jeremy> Give ports-mgmt/portmaster a try. I just did. One flaw it has is that I have two no longer supported ports installed. What do yo

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2007-02-15 Thread shaun
| 20050615| 20070215 +-+ japanese/lyx| 1.0.3 | 1.4.4 +-+ lang/sisc

[semi-OT] Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?

2007-02-15 Thread youshi10
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:17:00 -0600, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: = Pros: = -It's written in python (portable). Isn't our more portable for hardware than Python? Also, it is smaller? -It's a system which focuses on ports compilation from so

linphone: SDL and configure ?

2007-02-15 Thread Luigi Rizzo
This is related to the linphone-base port, which has its own problems, but still... I am trying to enable video support for it, and the first problem is that its configure script does not detect SDL unless i put an additiona -lpthread in CFLAGS (because libSDL requires some pthread functions). The

Re: [semi-OT] Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?

2007-02-15 Thread Freddie Cash
On Thu, February 15, 2007 4:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > I just want to help make a great system even better--that's all; the > only parts of the system I can possibly thinking of improving that > also align with my interests are the ports system

Re: [semi-OT] Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?

2007-02-15 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 04:32:00PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just want to help make a great system even better--that's all; the only > parts of the system I can possibly thinking of improving that also align > with my interests are the ports system and sound system (daemonizing it > li

Re: [semi-OT] Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?

2007-02-15 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:30:29PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > Enable the virtual channel support (see output of "sysctl -a | grep > vchans") and the kernel will automatically mix multiple sound streams > into one, and auto-assign programs to the different /dev/dsp0.* > devices as needed. Much ni

Re: [semi-OT] Re: portupgrade O(n^m)? (fwd)

2007-02-15 Thread youshi10
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Craig Boston wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:30:29PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: Enable the virtual channel support (see output of "sysctl -a | grep vchans") and the kernel will automatically mix multiple sound streams into one, and auto-assign programs to the different /d

Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?

2007-02-15 Thread RW
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:17:00 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I wasn't trying to port the pkg_* and port* utils to C++ thinking > that I would magically get more optimized code. Sure, C++ is much > better than ruby at optimizations if done correctly, but C++ is also > easier to screw up tha

any maintainer for linphone ?

2007-02-15 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Is anyone working on the linphone port, or i can do that ? I managed to make linphone 1.6.0 work with video4linux and libosip2.2.2, so would like to replace the old port. If someone else is working on it, please contact me. I am cc-ing the osip2 maintainer because it seems that linphone does not

Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-02-15 Thread Ade Lovett
On Feb 13, 2007, at 00:23 , Peter Johnson wrote: The correct fix is probably a patch to the gettext configure script to disable the check for gmkdir. Hi Peter, Please see http://www.lovett.com/ade/freebsd/gettext-4.diff MD5 (gettext-4.diff) = 792085ea01e8242e7e0260bad3336efd This should ad

Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-02-15 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:01:03 -0600, Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 13, 2007, at 00:23 , Peter Johnson wrote: The correct fix is probably a patch to the gettext configure script to disable the check for gmkdir. Hi Peter, Please see http://www.lovett.com/ade/freebsd/gettext-4.d

Re: any maintainer for linphone ?

2007-02-15 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:15:34AM +0100, Soeren Straarup wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 07:35:29PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > Is anyone working on the linphone port, or i can do that ? > > > > I managed to make linphone 1.6.0 work with video4linux and > > libosip2.2.2, so would like to repla

Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-02-15 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:34:27PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Sounds good, I think that Kris said that 4.x support are going to be gone > in our tree (include bsd.*.mk) sometime soon (unsure on when, but soon). After the next -exp run. He and I are merging our changes to do this. mcl ___

Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-02-15 Thread Ade Lovett
On Feb 15, 2007, at 20:34 , Jeremy Messenger wrote: I have updated it in MC without bump it, but I always can bump it for gmkdir issue if one of my team request. Is it rare? If it is, then I think anyone can always reinstall it. :-) It'll only affect you if you happen to have an old devel/g

Re: any maintainer for linphone ?

2007-02-15 Thread Soeren Straarup
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 07:35:29PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Is anyone working on the linphone port, or i can do that ? > > I managed to make linphone 1.6.0 work with video4linux and > libosip2.2.2, so would like to replace the old port. > If someone else is working on it, please contact me. >

Re: linphone: SDL and configure ?

2007-02-15 Thread Alex Dupre
Luigi Rizzo wrote: > but if i just add -lpthread to LDFLAGS the linking (during configure) > fails. Any ideas why ? Probably simply a bad coded configure. Try to look at m4/video.m4. -- Alex Dupre ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: ParaView3 build...

2007-02-15 Thread fred
Michael Nottebrock wrote: Try running env QMAKESPEC=/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/freebsd-g++ cmake . Works much better, thanks ! By the way, PV3 does not find some ffmpeg libs, whereas ffmpeg is well installed. FFMPEG_INCLUDE_DIR */usr/local/include FFMPEG_avcodec_LIBRARY