On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 06:04 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-Oct-18 13:06:10 -0600, Charlie Sorsby wrote:
> >What does this mean and why is it so?
>
> You are trying to use antique software. Your problem is nothing to
> do with the version of FreeBSD that you are running. Rather, you
>
Hello,
Since Multi-core processors are becoming popular (or, more
egocentrically, since I've acquired one), I've become interested in
parallel compilation. Unfortunately, it seems that parallel builds of
any kind are completely unsupported by the ports framework at the
moment. My experimentati
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
Mark Ovens writes:
/root{115}# pkg_info -Rr mozilla-1.7.13,2
I believe this will show the run-depends, but not the
build-depnds.
Ah, yes, of course, but as I said in my OP, why would Mozilla be needed
as a *build* dependency?
Do
Mark Ovens schrieb:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
Mark Ovens writes:
/root{115}# pkg_info -Rr mozilla-1.7.13,2
I believe this will show the run-depends, but not the
build-depnds.
did you build and install jdk15 with the option "Enable the browser
plugin and Java Web Start
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2006-09-25 13:01:57 -0500:
> --On Monday, September 25, 2006 10:45:14 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >People still use Apache 1.3? (Kidding...)
>
> Absolutely. And until I can figure out how to get cgi working in apache2,
> I will *continue* to use a
Franz Klammer wrote:
Mark Ovens schrieb:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
Mark Ovens writes:
/root{115}# pkg_info -Rr mozilla-1.7.13,2
I believe this will show the run-depends, but not the
build-depnds.
did you build and install jdk15 with the option "Enable the browser
plu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Duane Whitty wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:40:42PM -0300, Duane Whitty wrote:
>> Not sure I understand why gconf would have a dependency on ldap.
>>
> After reading the gconftools-2 man page, am I understanding
> correctly that gconf can use
Mark Ovens schrieb:
Franz Klammer wrote:
Mark Ovens schrieb:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
Mark Ovens writes:
/root{115}# pkg_info -Rr mozilla-1.7.13,2
I believe this will show the run-depends, but not the
build-depnds.
did you build and install jdk15 with the option "En
Benjamin Lutz wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm sure I'm not the only person that has thought about this. Maybe
> there already is an effort to allow for parallelism in port builds.
German speaking people might be interested in the following articles:
a) http://wiki.bsdforen.de/index.php/Bsdadminscripts#buil
I can't figure out why gnome-system-tools fails to build, I've pasted
the log below. I also tried the log analyzer, but it wasn't of any
help in identifying the problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cd /usr/ports/sysutils/gnome-system-tools/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make
===> Extracting for gnome-system-tools-2.
On Thursday 19 October 2006 10:24, Benjamin Lutz wrote:
>..
> o Mark the ports that allow parallel building by adding a new flag
>that can be used in ports makefiles, eg. PARALLEL_BUILDING=yes.
>With such a port, the build target would call, say
>"gmake -j${PARALLEL_NUM}" instead of ju
Any chance of getting PR 104567 (update Asterisk to 1.2.13) committed during
the freeze?
Although it's a version update, it is in response to a security hole...
--
Thomas Sandford
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Hi.
I found a idea to make the Flash7 plugin more stable.
1. Please install ports/x11-fonts/cyberbit-ttfonts.
I think that almost users have no problem. Maybe non-ISO8859-1
users have a stability problem. Because the Flash7 plugin
required followi
Hi,
according to the status report sent around today, X11BASE should be
dropped in favour for LOCALBASE.
Is there an actual schedule until when this should happen and how should
we deal with our current ports now? Just remove the USE_X_PREFIX macro
when we submit new PRs for (our) existing ports
On 10/19/06, Marcus von Appen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
according to the status report sent around today, X11BASE should be
dropped in favour for LOCALBASE.
Is there an actual schedule until when this should happen and how should
we deal with our current ports now? Just remove the USE_X_PR
On 2006.10.19 10:02:42 +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> Yeah, or use DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes (which really doesn't mean
> much, I think IGNORE_FORBIDDEN would be a better name).
DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES is to disable portaudit's checks, not
FORBIDDEN checks. I'm actually not really sure what d
+[ Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19.Oct.2006 06:21):
|
[snipped]
| > In this particular case, you only need the compat3x libraries to
| > bootstrap jre so it may be practical for you to:
| > 1) comment out the "FORBIDDEN" line in compat3x
| > 2) install compat3x and the jre1.1.8 binary
Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
I found a idea to make the Flash7 plugin more stable.
Now if only someone could make it work on CURRENT... /me wonders.
Has any progress been made on implementing the needed Linux syscalls to
make this happen?
- Rainer
_
Hello,
Do you have any plan to update the port to postgre-8.1.5?
I checked the ports tree today but postgresql81-server and -client ports
are still 8.1.4.
-
With best regards, |The Power to Serve
Nguyen Tam Chinh| http://www.FreeBSD.org
Loc: sp.cs.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to the status report sent around today, X11BASE should be
> dropped in favour for LOCALBASE.
>
> Is there an actual schedule until when this should happen and how should
> we deal with our current ports now? Jus
Hello,
I'm having a terrible time with gnucash
I portupgraded an enormous amount of stuff yesterday. The only big
problems I had were related to gnucash. I had cvsup'ed somewhere in
between important commits of the makefile apparently, and as a result
had some troubles (guppi, glade, gal,
On, Thu Oct 19, 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > according to the status report sent around today, X11BASE should be
> > dropped in favour for LOCALBASE.
> >
> > Is there an actual schedule until when this should happe
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:55:16PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> On, Thu Oct 19, 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > according to the status report sent around today, X11BASE should be
> > > dropped in favour
On 10/19/06 15:14, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:55:16PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
On, Thu Oct 19, 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
Hi,
according to the status report sent around today, X11BASE should be
dropp
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:19:05PM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote:
> On 10/19/06 15:14, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:55:16PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> >>On, Thu Oct 19, 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> >
Hey can someone help me out? I got the latest stable release of FreeBSD (6.1)
and am trying to install the /usr/ports/net/samba3 port and I am a little lost
after the install. How do I load it? Do I edit the inetd or rc.conf? I did some
research on the ‘net but I am a little lost. I’m new to Fre
[FreeBSD 6.1, CVS updated]
Hey,
I read up a bit on this error (see below), and it seems as though my only
option is to get the Sun/FreeBSD Corp. binaries (by the way, could I get a
link to this?), assuming they still work with 6.1, though I'd rather build
it.
The jist of the error I'm getting i
Jason Gretz wrote:
Hey can someone help me out? I got the latest stable release of FreeBSD (6.1)
and am trying to install the /usr/ports/net/samba3 port and I am a little lost
after the install. How do I load it? Do I edit the inetd or rc.conf? I did some
research on the ‘net but I am a little
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:23:40PM -0400, Andy Street wrote:
> [FreeBSD 6.1, CVS updated]
>
> Hey,
>
> I read up a bit on this error (see below), and it seems as though my only
> option is to get the Sun/FreeBSD Corp. binaries (by the way, could I get a
> link to this?), assuming they still work
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of
ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of
ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exp
Thanks, fixed my same problem.
On 10/17/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:31:13 -0500, Jiawei Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ran into this several times so what I did was remove all GNOME
> related components, did a portupgrade -rf pkg-conf\* and reinsta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Configuration has to be done in
/usr/local/etc/smb.conf
For further information on that file consult samba.org.
Spadge wrote:
> Jason Gretz wrote:
>> Hey can someone help me out? I got the latest stable release of
>> FreeBSD (6.1) and am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
You should try:
portupgrade -f lang/slib-guile && portupgrade -f finance/gnucash
Greetings,
Kay
Eric Schuele wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having a terrible time with gnucash
>
> I portupgraded an enormous amount of stuff yesterday. T
On 10/19/06 20:17, Kay Abendroth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
You should try:
portupgrade -f lang/slib-guile && portupgrade -f finance/gnucash
Thank you for the response.
Actually I have tried that. Still no go. Presently churning through
`portupgrade -f
The following reply was made to PR ports/9964; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (dfilter service)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/9964: commit references a PR
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 03:17:38 + (UTC)
chinsan 2006-10-20 03:17:30 UTC
FreeBSD doc reposi
I am just wondering if anyone knows how to fix this problemEver
since I upgraded to Gnome 2.16, the GTK themes that I've tried don't
apply in Firefox/Thunderbird 1.5 like they used to when I was using
Gnome 2.14Is this a known issue? Are there any workarounds? I
really dislike the default
Benjamin Lutz wrote:
Hello,
Since Multi-core processors are becoming popular (or, more
egocentrically, since I've acquired one), I've become interested in
parallel compilation. Unfortunately, it seems that parallel builds of
any kind are completely unsupported by the ports framework at the
m
Indigo 23 wrote:
I am just wondering if anyone knows how to fix this problemEver
since I upgraded to Gnome 2.16, the GTK themes that I've tried don't
apply in Firefox/Thunderbird 1.5 like they used to when I was using
Gnome 2.14Is this a known issue? Are there any workarounds? I
really d
39 matches
Mail list logo
