On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 06:46:00PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:43:32 -0400
> > From: "Michael Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On 10/17/06, Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I ran the exact commands specified in the UPDATIN
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:29:05AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> Any particular reason for no vim scripts in ports?
> I'm gonna make some, if there's no secret taboo.
>
> Also, now that vim comes with a spellchecker, I'll
> start thinking about dictionaries. I already use
> /usr/share/dict/*
I no longer have time to maintain the ports byacc, I would
like to hand over the ownership to anyone who has interest to
maintain it.
Regards,
David Xu
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Hello,
I get the following errors when portupgrading guppi:
guppi-config-model.h:32:25: glade/glade.h: No such file or directory
In file included from guppi-config-model.c:32:
guppi-config-model.h:89: error: syntax error before '*' token
guppi-config-model.c:40: warning: excess elements in array
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Seems to me that glade is not installed properly. Try one of the two
commands in order:
portupgrade -f devel/libglade
portinstall devel/libglade
Note: In case you haven't installed sysutils/portupgrade try the following:
--On Wednesday, October 18, 2006 19:32:37 +0800 David Xu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I no longer have time to maintain the ports byacc, I would
like to hand over the ownership to anyone who has interest to
maintain it.
I will take it and submit a patch to update it to the 1.13 version.
Paul S
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:43:09AM -0500, David J Brooks wrote:
>
> Not for me. I get the same error message as before. I wonder what's
> making the difference for you...
>
You need to update your portaudit database:
portaudit -F
--
Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A
"A foolish consistency is
On 10/18/06 09:58, Kay Abendroth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Seems to me that glade is not installed properly. Try one of the two
commands in order:
portupgrade -f devel/libglade
Yes. The above did the trick.
Thanks.
portinstall devel/l
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:32:56 -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have multiple plugins, both native and linux (through
linuxpluginwrapper) in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/ and
The browser_plugins lives in LOCALBASE now, so it's in
/usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/.
Che
What does this mean and why is it so?
Wednesday, 18 Oct, 2006 -- 12:59:41 MDT
===> compat3x-i386-4.4.20020925 is forbidden: FreeBSD-SA-03:05.xdr,
FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath - not fixed / no lib available.
I'm trying to install jre from the ports collection of freeBSD 4.11
and get the following:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:06:10PM -0600, Charlie Sorsby wrote:
> What does this mean and why is it so?
>
> Wednesday, 18 Oct, 2006 -- 12:59:41 MDT
> ===> compat3x-i386-4.4.20020925 is forbidden: FreeBSD-SA-03:05.xdr,
> FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath - not fixed / no lib available.
It means there i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Charlie Sorsby wrote:
> What does this mean and why is it so?
It does mean the port is marked _FORBIDDEN_ and _shouldn't_ be
installed, because it introduces a vulnerability.
FreeBSD-SA-03:05.xdr
http://security.freebsd.org/adviso
On Wed, 2006-Oct-18 13:06:10 -0600, Charlie Sorsby wrote:
>What does this mean and why is it so?
You are trying to use antique software. Your problem is nothing to
do with the version of FreeBSD that you are running. Rather, you
are trying to use a binary that was built to run on FreeBSD 3.x.
>
Hello, I am a user of the amd64 platform and I have noticed a
regression that was introduced with GNOME 2.16.1, and specifically
databases/evolution-data-server 2.8.1.
The bug fixed by ports pr-93215 had its patch removed, but the bug
was never addressed by GNOME. The source has been slightly alt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> [..]
>> Perhaps if y'all were not so intent upon making free"BSD" less and
>> less BSD and more and more "invented here" such problems would be
>> less common.
>
> You may find that TUHS (www.tuhs.org) fulfils your needs bett
Is there anyway I can make gconf2 use openldap24? It wants
openldap23?
In my /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf I have these variables defined
for building devel/gconf
-DUSE_OPENLDAP -DWANT_OPENLDAP_SASL -DWANT_OPENLDAP_VER=24
Not sure I understand why gconf would have a dependency on ldap.
Best Reg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Duane Whitty wrote:
> [...]
>
> Not sure I understand why gconf would have a dependency on ldap.
Does it mean you don't need gconf-ldap-support?
If so do the following:
cd /usr/ports/devel/gconf2
make rmconfig
portins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The line below should (of course) go like this:
portinstall -m "WITHOUT_LDAP=yes" devel/gconf2
If you need support of OpenLDAP you should try to add the following line
to your /etc/make.conf:
WANT_OPENLDAP_VER?=24
Maybe this will
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:40:42PM -0300, Duane Whitty wrote:
> Not sure I understand why gconf would have a dependency on ldap.
>
After reading the gconftools-2 man page, am I understanding
correctly that gconf can use openldap for its schema storage,
thus providing a distributed configuration en
On Thursday 19 October 2006 00:43, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Wednesday, October 18, 2006 19:32:37 +0800 David Xu
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I no longer have time to maintain the ports byacc, I would
> > like to hand over the ownership to anyone who has interest to
> > maintain it.
>
> I wi
Updated my ports tree via portsnap, running ``portmanager -s'' show a
large number of ports needing upgrading/rebuilding (most where "built
with old dependency").
Ran ``portmanager -u'', which ran for several hours then finished like this:
===> Registering installation for gmime-2.2.3
===>
One of the 426 ports installed on my system keeps installing Mozilla
everytime it gets rebuilt, yet according to pkg_info, nothing depends on
it - output of pkg_info below.
I have Firefox installed and installing/rebuilding Mozilla takes a long
time so would rather this didn't happen.
Why do
Mark Ovens writes:
> /root{115}# pkg_info -Rr mozilla-1.7.13,2
I believe this will show the run-depends, but not the
build-depnds.
Do you have OpenOffice installed?
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebs
Robert Huff wrote:
> Mark Ovens writes:
>
>> /root{115}# pkg_info -Rr mozilla-1.7.13,2
>
> I believe this will show the run-depends, but not the
> build-depnds.
> Do you have OpenOffice installed?
>
WITH_MOZILLA= firefox
WITH_GECKO= firefox
in your /etc/make.conf will help s
24 matches
Mail list logo
