Dear sir/madam,
the upgrade of guppi to the new version fails on my system. I get the
following error and I have already tried the loganalyzer.sh script but
that didn't give any results.
Look at my error message and can you discover what is happening from
that? I hope so, so I can go on and upgra
Chuck Swiger wrote:
>
> pkgdb should have known the origin of ldconfig_compat-1.0_8 as
> misc/ldconfig_compat, and it should have tried to install that port.
>
> (It didn't. That's one problem, and on your TODO list. :)
I meant the problem on my TODO list was 'can't convert nil to String'.
Well
Is portsmon down? Been trying to hit if for the last couple days.
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Peter
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the
FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new
software along with all the unmaintained ports. Has the port team ever
thought about:
A) Making a delete port pr request. This way port maintainers INSTEAD
of m
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is portsmon down? Been trying to hit if for the last couple days.
>
>
> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, hardware problems AFAIR.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectu
Peter Thoenen wrote:
A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the
FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new
software along with all the unmaintained ports. Has the port team ever
thought about:
A) Making a delete port pr request. This way port m
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> Please fix any errors as soon as possible.
>
> - *print/pdflib* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: pdflib-7.0.0_1 < pdflib-7.0.0p1
7.0.0p1 wasn't fetchable, so it should be ok 7.0.0_1.
--
Alex Dupre
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mail
I can't get this to upgrade from cairo-1.0.4_1 to cairo-1.2.4.
Far into the build:
...
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I../pixman/src
-I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -Wall -Wsign-compare
-Werror-implicit-func
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:53:32PM -0700, Peter Thoenen wrote:
> B) In line with A, has anybody thought about just marking ALL
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] as scheduled for deletion on X date.
It turns out that a few of them are key pieces of infrastructure. Perhaps
we can generate a list of "ports that w
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:53:32 -0500, Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the
FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new
software along with all the unmaintained ports. Has the port team ever
thought abo
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:53:32PM -0700, Peter Thoenen wrote:
>
> A) Making a delete port pr request. This way port maintainers INSTEAD
> of marking 'transfer ownership to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and hoping
> somebody takes it over one day could actually just delete ports they no
> longer wish to mai
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 04:56:07PM +0200, Kjell B. wrote:
>
> I can't get this to upgrade from cairo-1.0.4_1 to cairo-1.2.4.
>
> Far into the build:
>
> ...
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I../pixman/src
> -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
> -I/usr/
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention
Original Message
From: Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kjell B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re:graphics/cairo broken on 4.11-RELEASE-p25?
Date: 2006-10-15 20:36
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 04:56:07PM +0200, Kjell B. wrote:
>> I can't get this
On 10/15/06, Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 04:56:07PM +0200, Kjell B. wrote:
>
> I can't get this to upgrade from cairo-1.0.4_1 to cairo-1.2.4.
>
> Far into the build:
>
> ...
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I../pixman/src
> -I/usr/local/include/freetype2
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:53:32PM -0700, Peter Thoenen wrote:
> A couple months ago somebody posted a heads up on this list from the
> FreeBSD Ports Team about ports bloat and the massive influx of new
> software along with all the unmaintained ports. Has the port team ever
> thought about:
>
>
As Doug Barton wrote:
> Looks like someone else already got to this, the cvs master is
> already updated.
I did after Matthew reported it, and after getting portmgr's
approval.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/N
Peter Thoenen wrote:
A) Making a delete port pr request. This way port maintainers INSTEAD
of marking 'transfer ownership to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and hoping
somebody takes it over one day could actually just delete ports they no
longer wish to maintain. There should be some sort of WARN marking
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> The FreeBSD GNOME Team is proud to announce that GNOME 2.16.1 has been
> imported into the ports tree in time for FreeBSD 6.2. This is a first.
> Usually the GNOME release cycle has conflicted with the FreeBSD release
> cycle. However, thanks to Kris and pointyhat, we w
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention
Hi,
I ranned into a couple of problems with this port.
1. Checksum mismatch.
Attempting to fetch from http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gtkpod/.
fetch:
http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gtkpod/gtkpod-0.99.8.tar.gz:
size of remote file is not known
gtkpod-0.99.8.tar
On 10/15/06, martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> The FreeBSD GNOME Team is proud to announce that GNOME 2.16.1 has been
> imported into the ports tree in time for FreeBSD 6.2. This is a first.
> Usually the GNOME release cycle has conflicted with the FreeBSD release
>
I'm trying to replace an old machine. I've got a new Sun X2100
that I plan on using for this, and I have installed 6.2 AMD64
on it.
However, I'm getting a message in the Cricket cgi pages about
AMD64 not being supported.
What is the status of this? Should I reinstall with teh I386
version of 6.2?
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention
tried to portupgrade.. no avail
sd# portupgrade eboard
[Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 115 packages
found (-0 +1) . done]
[Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 14186 port
entries found
.1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.6000.7000..
26 matches
Mail list logo
