On Tue, 2006-Sep-19 07:04:56 +0200, Martin Nilsson wrote:
>For instance every time I portupgrade dhcpd I have to remember to start
>it manually after the upgrade. As portupgrade knows how to stop the
>daemon before the upgrade it should also know how to start it afterwards.
Stopping the daemon i
* Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-19]:
> On Tue, 2006-Sep-19 07:04:56 +0200, Martin Nilsson wrote:
> >For instance every time I portupgrade dhcpd I have to remember to start
> >it manually after the upgrade. As portupgrade knows how to stop the
> >daemon before the upgrade it should als
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:46:00PM +1000 I heard the voice of
Peter Jeremy, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Stopping the daemon is easy: "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/ stop".
More to the point, portupgrade doesn't stop it. pkg_delete does,
because stopping it is in the plist. e.g., for spamassassin:
% g
On 9/19/06, Hans F. Nordhaug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good point, but isn't it as easy to check the status before stopping
it: "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/ status"? You could even check the
reported pid. If the status is in some way unclear to portupgrade,
portupgrade could warn the user - "Servic
> Is there a policy about how to deal with running daemons and portupgrade?
>
> For instance every time I portupgrade dhcpd I have to remember to start
> it manually after the upgrade. As portupgrade knows how to stop the
> daemon before the upgrade it should also know how to start it afterwards.
>
Hi,
Can someone familiar with the QT tools uic and moc take a look at
ports/102829 - the port in question is using scons and the directory
/usr/X11R6/etc/settings/ is being created during build but probably
the problem is not in the port or the software itself but rather in
qt or scons. It looks v
Vasil Dimov wrote:
Hi,
Can someone familiar with the QT tools uic and moc take a look at
ports/102829 - the port in question is using scons and the directory
/usr/X11R6/etc/settings/ is being created during build but probably
the problem is not in the port or the software itself but rather in
qt
Vasil Dimov wrote:
Hi,
Can someone familiar with the QT tools uic and moc take a look at
ports/102829 - the port in question is using scons and the directory
/usr/X11R6/etc/settings/ is being created during build but probably
the problem is not in the port or the software itself but rather in
qt
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:57:15PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> Vasil Dimov wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Can someone familiar with the QT tools uic and moc take a look at
> >ports/102829 - the port in question is using scons and the directory
> >/usr/X11R6/etc/settings/ is being created during build but pr
If there is anybody actively using log4cxx and having time/resources to
do some port work for it, you might be interested in the forwarded message.
As I described below, I did manual compilation once for one time job,
unfortunately I don't have resources now to do a proper port (and I will
not ne
Timur,
please take a look at the following bug report:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4109
It might be better to start reading with the first followup and then
proceed to original submission.
I submitted this bug to Samba as I think it is better to fix their code,
but it might turn o
Hi,
i found a small missmatch in the libodbc installation script.
here it is, when I wanted to compile iodbctest.c located
in /usr/local/share/examples/libiodbc/
the makefile would crash on dependencies that aren't there.
i went back to the ports/*/libiodbc/work/...
and found the sample script
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:32:40 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:48:52AM +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: undefined reference to `lua_createtable'
LuaExtension.o(.text+0x34d): In function
`cf_scite_constname(lua_State*)':
[...]
The question is why
Since the recent upgrades (in the last couple of months, I'd say) when I
run some variant of:
portupgrade -aRp
I noticed that, in case some port fails during build or install, the -p
option will repackage the existing port. You can verify it by simply
pressing ^C during compile phase.
I
Hi,
I'd like to submit my patches for MPICH 2 to the developper team.
But I haven't got any reply from them after I sent mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Can you tell me how to contact them indeed?
If anybody is actively using ACE on freebsd and has time/resources to do
some port work, you might be interested.
There is an issue with using ACE default thread flags on FreeBSD with
libpthread, the issue is described and discussed in the following
message thread:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/get
on 19/09/2006 18:10 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> My favorite solution would be to go with Daniel Eischen's suggestion and
> to make THR_NEW_LWP an alias for THR_SCOPE_PROCESS when ACE is built on
^
I meant to write THR_SCOPE_SYSTEM here
> F
Michael Graziano writes:
| I believe our 2950 is BIOS Rev. A03 as well, I'll reboot it tomorrow
| if I have a chance and get the Dell version ID.
|
| dmesg-wise, my first iomem range is the same as for A02, but my
| second is not. I'm leaning toward the explanation that Dell moved
| somethi
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:25:46 +0200, Angelo Turetta wrote
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:32:40 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote
> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:48:52AM +0200,
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> : undefined reference to `lua_createtable'
> >>> LuaExtension.o(.text+0
Le Mar 19 sep 06 à 16:47:50 +0200, Intron is my alias on the Internet <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
> Hi,
Hello,
> I'd like to submit my patches for MPICH 2 to the developper team.
> But I haven't got any reply from them after I sent mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
> Can you tell me ho
Vasil Dimov schrieb:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:57:15PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
>
>> Vasil Dimov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can someone familiar with the QT tools uic and moc take a look at
>>> ports/102829 - the port in question is using scons and the directory
>>> /usr/X11R6/etc/setti
This is the first time I've tried to modify a port,
and I'm having a bit of trouble because this port
requires MySQL 3.23 and PHP 4. Those dependencies
weren't specified in the port before.
I've gotten PHP4 by adding:
USE_PHP=gd mysql session
DEFAULT_PHP_VER=4
WANT_PHP_WEB= yes
IGNORE_
On 2006.09.19 12:23:55 -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> Also, where do I go to get www/dotproject-2.0.2 marked
> as vulnerable in the portaudit database?
Your mail to secteam@ slipped through the cracks. Sorry about that.
To mark something vulnerable in portaudit it needs to be added to the
VuXML docum
Hi Fred,
thanks for your work on this port. Could you please resubmit the update
as a unified diff and send it as a problem report (PR). Otherwise
your work will probably get lost in the vast amount of email that gets
posted on freebsd-ports.
More information in the Porter's Handbook
http://www.f
--- Simon Barner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> thanks for your work on this port. Could you please
> resubmit the update
> as a unified diff and send it as a problem report
> (PR).
I'm on my way towards doing that, but I want to get it
right beforehand. I want to be able to require
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:23:55PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> This is the first time I've tried to modify a port,
> and I'm having a bit of trouble because this port
> requires MySQL 3.23 and PHP 4. Those dependencies
> weren't specified in the port before.
>
> I've gotten PHP4 by adding:
>
> USE_
The snort port won't fetch because the version number has been changed.
=> snort-2.6.0.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fetch from http://www.snort.org/dl/current/.
fetch: http://www.snort.org/dl/current/snort-2.6.0.tar.gz: Not Found
=> Attempting to fetch f
For my second iteration of installing this through the
original port, I was able to install mysql323-client
and php4 before installing dotproject, and everything
worked. So it appears that php4-mysql will use
mysql323-client if it's already installed. I haven't
dug through the code to see how tha
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:15:53PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> For my second iteration of installing this through the
> original port, I was able to install mysql323-client
> and php4 before installing dotproject, and everything
> worked. So it appears that php4-mysql will use
> mysql323-client if it
Would you recommend doing the partial job of updating
the port for the vulnerability and requiring PHP4
while I work on the ultimate solution?
Thanks,
Fred
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:15:53PM -0700, Fred Cox
> wrote:
> > For my second iteration of i
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:42:37PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> Would you recommend doing the partial job of updating
> the port for the vulnerability and requiring PHP4
> while I work on the ultimate solution?
It will result in a broken port unless you can address the mysql
thing - there's no way aro
It's current state is that it will install a
vulnerable version with either the installed php and
mysql client or php5 and mysql5. In the latter case,
there are many bugs in the installed port.
If I submit what I have now, it will install the
updated version with PHP4. The user will still have
t
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:18:01PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> It's current state is that it will install a
> vulnerable version with either the installed php and
> mysql client or php5 and mysql5. In the latter case,
> there are many bugs in the installed port.
>
> If I submit what I have now, it w
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Will fail to package" is pretty far from perfection
> in my book :)
>
I don't believe I ever said that. It builds fine and
even runs, it just has lots of bugs.
Can you let me know what I said that gave you that
impression?
Fred
> Mark the por
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:25:45PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
>
>
> --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Will fail to package" is pretty far from perfection
> > in my book :)
> >
>
> I don't believe I ever said that. It builds fine and
> even runs, it just has lots of bugs.
>
> Ca
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:25:45PM -0700, Fred Cox
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > "Will fail to package" is pretty far from
> perfection
> > > in my book :)
> > >
> >
> > I don't believe I ever said th
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:00:14PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:25:45PM -0700, Fred Cox
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Will fail to package" is pretty far from
> >
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:00:14PM -0700, Fred Cox
> wrote:
> > --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:25:45PM -0700, Fred
> Cox
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:19:23PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> > No, I guess you've still misunderstood. I don't
> > know how many times I
> > can say this, but let me try to explain once more:
> > your port should be
> > buildable with the default settings of all ports
> > involved.
> >
> > This m
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:19:23PM -0700, Fred Cox
> wrote:
>
> > > No, I guess you've still misunderstood. I don't
> > > know how many times I
> > > can say this, but let me try to explain once
> more:
> > > your port should be
> > > buildable with
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> Actually, it doesn't. It goes ahead and installs it,
> even though I specified these:
>
> WITH_MYSQL= yes
> WANT_MYSQL_VER= 323
> IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL=5
>
> Starting with a system that had no MySQL or PHP
> installed on it, I did a ma
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Fred Cox
> wrote:
>
> > Actually, it doesn't. It goes ahead and installs
> it,
> > even though I specified these:
> >
> > WITH_MYSQL= yes
> > WANT_MYSQL_VER= 323
> > IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL=5
> >
> > Startin
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:02:52PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Fred Cox
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Actually, it doesn't. It goes ahead and installs
> > it,
> > > even though I specified these:
> > >
> > > WITH_M
On Sep 19, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Michael Graziano writes:
| I believe our 2950 is BIOS Rev. A03 as well, I'll reboot it tomorrow
| if I have a chance and get the Dell version ID.
|
| dmesg-wise, my first iomem range is the same as for A02, but my
| second is not. I'm leaning t
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:02:52PM -0700, Fred Cox
> wrote:
> > --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Fred
> Cox
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Actually, it doesn't. It goes ahead and
> install
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> > > It's still better than the current situation.
> >
> > Publishing packages that will not run because
> > they're linked to the
> > wrong libraries is, again, not my idea of "better".
> >
>
> There is no linkage problem. It's a clie
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Fred Cox
> wrote:
>
> > > > It's still better than the current situation.
> > >
> > > Publishing packages that will not run because
> > > they're linked to the
> > > wrong libraries is, again, not my idea of
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:49:52PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote:
> > Then you haven't explained yourself very well,
> > because at the start of
> > this thread you were talking about a conflict
> > between the mysql 3 and
> > mysql 5 *clients*, not servers.
> >
>
> I haven't been able to verify for sur
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006, at 19:09:38 -0400, Tamouh H. wrote:
>
> Hi Oliver,
>
> While attempting to install courier-imap on fresh FreeBSD 6.1
> install, I encounter this error (seems file gdbm.h is missing):
>
> chochang# make install distclean
> ===> Building for courier-imap-4.1.1,1
> gmake all
> > gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory
> > `/usr/ports/mail/courier-imap/work/courier-imap-4.1.1/gdbmobj'
> > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory
> > `/usr/ports/mail/courier-imap/work/courier-imap-4.1.1' gmake: ***
> > [all] Error 2 *** Error
Mark Kane wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006, at 19:09:38 -0400, Tamouh H. wrote:
> >
> > Hi Oliver,
> >
> > While attempting to install courier-imap on fresh FreeBSD 6.1
> > install, I encounter this error (seems file gdbm.h is missing):
> >
please reinstall your gdm port and then try courier-imap
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006, at 06:16:30 +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Mark Kane wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006, at 19:09:38 -0400, Tamouh H. wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Oliver,
> > >
> > > While attempting to install courier-imap on fresh FreeBSD 6.1
> > > install, I encounter this error (seems file gdb
Kris Kennaway ha scritto:
Damn, how many messages should I read?! :-)
> If there is no problem with using the mysql 5.x client, then just use
> mysql 5.x and be done with it. You need to figure out whether or not
> that is true. If it is false, then there's clearly a problem for you
I bet the
53 matches
Mail list logo
