Re: PHP 5.1.6 Command Line Arg Gives Seg Fault

2006-09-14 Thread Ron Tarrant
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Even if php is built without debug hooks, you should still get a stack trace with function names from gdb. Make sure everything builds with -g, and doesn't link with -s. :-) It turns out it's the module, not php itself. The behaviour is still strange, but at least it

Please help

2006-09-14 Thread Marco Merli
Hi, I've read your mail: Please Help (Thu Sep 4 06:26:55 PDT 2003 ) at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2003-September/004268.html About the complilation of Pysol 4.82 for winXP: Have you any news, please? I have the same problem. Thank you in advance Marco

ODBC variables naming problems

2006-09-14 Thread ganael.laplanche
Hi all, In databases/postgresql-odbc, the variable name for the ODBC flavour is 'DRIVER_MANAGER'. In net/openldap23-server, it is 'WITH_ODBC_TYPE'. Would it be possible to use uniform variable names between these ports ? Ganaël LAPLANCHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.martymac.com Tel : (+33)6.84.

Re: ODBC variables naming problems

2006-09-14 Thread Sam Lawrance
ganael.laplanche wrote: Hi all, In databases/postgresql-odbc, the variable name for the ODBC flavour is 'DRIVER_MANAGER'. In net/openldap23-server, it is 'WITH_ODBC_TYPE'. Would it be possible to use uniform variable names between these ports ? This might be a candidate for ports/KNOBS. __

Re: Samba and FAM

2006-09-14 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, 2006-Sep-13 11:42:06 -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: >The catch 22 is that Courier-Imap attempts to use FAM even when it is >not configured to do so. So, I have to have FAM installed. I could get >it all working by deinstalling and reinstalling in the right order ... >until portmanag

Re: Please help

2006-09-14 Thread LI Xin
Marco Merli wrote: > Hi, > I've read your mail: Please Help (Thu Sep 4 06:26:55 PDT 2003 ) > at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2003-September/004268.html > > About the complilation of Pysol 4.82 for winXP: Have you any news, please? > I have the same problem. > > Thank you

Re: ODBC variables naming problems

2006-09-14 Thread ganael.laplanche
> > Would it be possible to use uniform variable names between these ports ? > > > This might be a candidate for ports/KNOBS. I think so... Could the porters handle this ? Best regards, Ganael. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists

Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

2006-09-14 Thread Bill Fenner
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A list by MAINTAINER is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In addition, the li

Re: FreeBSD Port: ipmi-kmod-20060418_1

2006-09-14 Thread J. Martin Petersen
Nick Barkas wrote: Thanks for your reply. I unfortunately do not have any Dell hardware to test with. We have a "spare" machine (it is a hot-backup of a production machine) I can test stuff on occasionally, if you got something specific. It looks like there have not been any significant c

Re: [HEADS UP]: sdl port will be updated

2006-09-14 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Stanislav Sedov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > We are going to update all sdl ports to latest version. > This will require modifications to sdl-dependent ports, > and we are currently doing full build in tinderbox > to ensure that all goes right. I.e. that will be include/SDL12, sdl12-config, etc.?

Re: Samba and FAM

2006-09-14 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 9/14/06, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2006-Sep-13 11:42:06 -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: >The catch 22 is that Courier-Imap attempts to use FAM even when it is >not configured to do so. So, I have to have FAM installed. I could get >it all working by deinstalling and r

Re: [HEADS UP]: sdl port will be updated

2006-09-14 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:35:51 +0400 Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > * Stanislav Sedov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > We are going to update all sdl ports to latest version. > > This will require modifications to sdl-dependent ports, > > and we are currently doing full build in tin

R: Re: gtk-glade

2006-09-14 Thread Vittorio
The program "incollector" isn't in the ports but I'm trying to build a port (I'm a newbye port-builder!) from the original *nix sources. With your answer do you mean that gtk-glade is a linux library only OR did I misled you speaking of "linux documentation"? In other words that gtk- glade stuf

Re: [HEADS UP]: sdl port will be updated

2006-09-14 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Stanislav Sedov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I.e. that will be include/SDL12, sdl12-config, etc.? > > Are there other changes besides version? > No, it will resemble original distribution (include/SDL, sdl-config). > In any case you should not rely on this and always use bsd.sdl.mk > supplied v

Re: R: Re: gtk-glade

2006-09-14 Thread B Briggs
Vittorio wrote: The program "incollector" isn't in the ports but I'm trying to build a port (I'm a newbye port-builder!) from the original *nix sources. With your answer do you mean that gtk-glade is a linux library only OR did I misled you speaking of "linux documentation"? In other words tha

Re: R: Re: gtk-glade

2006-09-14 Thread vittorio
Right, I could have missed that depency but if I compile and install incollector "./configure;make;make check;make install" here what happens bash-2.05b$ incollector Unhandled Exception: System.ArgumentException: Cannot get resource file 'gui.glade' Parameter name: resource_name in <0x00

Re: R: Re: gtk-glade

2006-09-14 Thread B Briggs
vittorio wrote: Right, I could have missed that depency but if I compile and install =20 incollector "./configure;make;make check;make install"=20 here what happens bash-2.05b$ incollector Unhandled Exception:=20 System.ArgumentException: Cannot get resource file 'gui.glade' Parameter name

FreeBSD Port: fpc-fcl-2.0.4

2006-09-14 Thread Aleš Katona
The dependency of FCL in ports on mysql and other databases is wrong. You don't need mysql or others installed for FCL to "work". There are many units in the FCL but most of them are stand-alone header translations. Imagine that when you install java, you'd have to install all possible databases a

FreeBSD Port: php5-5.1.6

2006-09-14 Thread rfaria
Hi. I'm having some problems with php5 port. I have two machines with standard php5-extensions (from ports) install... And I'm unable to install Zend Platform in both. I have asked about it in ZP forum. http://www.zend.com/forums/index.php? t=msg&th=1874&start=0&S=fa23716a1b184ffc12ffb9875428bdc

mgetty broken

2006-09-14 Thread Patrick Reich
Hi all, mgetty is currently marked as broken due to incomplete pkg-plist. Just checking to see if this might be corrected in time for 6.2. Thanks Pat ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports

Re: mgetty broken

2006-09-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 05:44:27PM -0500, Patrick Reich wrote: > > Hi all, > > mgetty is currently marked as broken due to incomplete > pkg-plist. Just checking to see if this might be > corrected in time for 6.2. I hope so :) The maintainer didn't respond yet though - so perhaps someone else c

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.1.6

2006-09-14 Thread LI Xin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi. > > I'm having some problems with php5 port. > > I have two machines with standard php5-extensions (from ports) install... > And I'm unable to install Zend Platform in both. > > I have asked about it in ZP forum. > http://www.zend.com/forums/index.php? > t=msg&th=1

Re: FreeBSD Port: ipmi-kmod-20060418_1

2006-09-14 Thread Michael Graziano
I believe our 2950 is BIOS Rev. A03 as well, I'll reboot it tomorrow if I have a chance and get the Dell version ID. dmesg-wise, my first iomem range is the same as for A02, but my second is not. I'm leaning toward the explanation that Dell moved something on us and done went and broke the

Port Makefiles and the MANPREFIX macro

2006-09-14 Thread Matt Dawson
Hi all, Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be appreciated. Three of the ports I maintain have decided that the man pages belong in ${PREFIX}/share/man/man(n). Now, reading the Porter's H

Re: Port Makefiles and the MANPREFIX macro

2006-09-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:22:15AM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote: > Hi all, > Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a > strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be > appreciated. > > Three of the ports I maintain have decided that the man p

Re: Port Makefiles and the MANPREFIX macro

2006-09-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:25:14AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:22:15AM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote: > > Hi all, > > Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a > > strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be > > appr

Re: Port Makefiles and the MANPREFIX macro

2006-09-14 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:22:15 +0100 Matt Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > Hi all, > Currently doing battle with some port updates and I have come across a > strange problem. It's probably my fault, but some guidance would be > appreciated. > It's probably happened because of recent