Hi,
A bug in start-up script /usr/local/etc/rc.d/teamspeak-server is discovered,
causing teamspeak-server to load earlier than linux support. It happens on my
FreeBSD 6.1 box but not in my FreeBSD 5.5 box.
Problem code:
(line 6)
# REQUIRE: NETWORKING
I think since FreeBSD 6 it will inpsect th
on 05/09/2006 00:19 Stanislav Sedov said the following:
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:45:18 +0300
> Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>> I have one libtool.m4 in /usr/local/share/aclocal/ and there is no
>> libtool.m4 in /usr/local/gnu-autotools/share/aclocal-1.9.
>> Is that the problem ?
>>
>
RW wrote:
...
> I don't use portmaster myself, but I just took a look at the script and,
> unless I'm missing something, it does appear that this feature is missing
> from portmaster. There an option to create backup packages, but nothing to
> automatically restore the previous version if the
Can anyone tell me what broke here?
Updating collection ports-base/cvs
Finished successfully
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..eclipse-3.1.2:
"/usr/ports/www/"firefox"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
===> java/eclipse failed
*** Error code 1
1 e
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:10:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Updating collection ports-base/cvs
> Finished successfully
> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
> wait..eclipse-3.1.2: "/usr/ports/www/"firefox"" non-existent -- dependency
> list incomplete
> ===> java/eclipse
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Soeren Straarup wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, William Bulley wrote:
I don't know who is the correct person, or even if there
is a ports maintainer for the linphone port. A friend of
mine told me he is unable to build the port in 6.1-STABLE
since so many other dependencies ha
According to Soeren Straarup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Where is it available at?
He is moving to 1.4 version from what I understand.
Not the most confidence inspiring URL, but here is what the author has:
http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/linphone/unstable/source/
> linphone-1.3.9
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:10:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me what broke here?
>
> Updating collection ports-base/cvs
> Finished successfully
> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
> wait..eclipse-3.1.2: "/usr/ports/www/"firefox"" non-existent --
I can add new facts:
# kismet -n
Server options: -n
Client options: none
Starting server...
Waiting for server to start before starting UI...
Not logging any data
Will drop privs to stayd (1001) gid 1001
No specific sources given to be enabled, all will be enabled.
Enabling channel hopping.
Di
Mark Linimon writes:
> What happens if you do "make -V WITH_MOZILLA"?
You get evidence supporting the hypothesis I'm an idiot.
Thanks.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
Hi,
i have written a rather long paper describing the Freebsd port system, and
comparing it with the Debian system. This has some information which is, i
hope, orthogonal to that in the Porter's handbook. You can find the TeX
source, the PDF and an html version here:
http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~t
Hello,
Firstly, great movement and thanks for doing this. However, I think
idea of BSD statistics project can be extended over packages as well.
Right now it often comes to frustration to see, i.e., tons of rarely
used by anyone packages on 4 distribution CDs, but no such a useful
package as SDL
On 9/5/06, Alexey Dokuchaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Firstly, great movement and thanks for doing this. However, I think
idea of BSD statistics project can be extended over packages as well.
Right now it often comes to frustration to see, i.e., tons of rarely
used by anyone packages
Hans Lambermont wrote:
> RW wrote:
>
> ...
>> I don't use portmaster myself, but I just took a look at the script and,
>> unless I'm missing something, it does appear that this feature is missing
>> from portmaster. There an option to create backup packages, but nothing to
>> automatically res
B Briggs wrote:
> Rene Ladan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what about the idea of using 'make config-conditional' instead of 'make
>> config' in portmaster to configure ports? This way
>> /var/db/ports/*/options is respected.
>>
>> The downside is that you have to run 'make rmconfig' in order to
>> reconfig
Hi lx,
there seems to be a small bug in the FreeBSD port of libssh2.
The make will return the following errors after calling it:
devil1:/usr/ports/security/libssh2 # make
===> Building for libssh2-0.14
cc -o channel.o channel.c -c -O -pipe /usr/local/include -I/usr/include -Wall
-I../includ
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:33:47AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> You get evidence supporting the hypothesis I'm an idiot.
> Thanks.
No problem, there are plenty of ways to shoot your feet off, I've spent
the last few decades iterating over them.
mcl
_
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:09:21 +0400
Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> Firts of, consider reading /usr/ports/UPDATING "20060616: AFFECTS
> users of emulation/linux_base-*". If none of suggestions help you than
> write your results here.
I have run again the commands to change the linux
Doug Barton wrote:
Hans Lambermont wrote:
RW wrote:
...
I don't use portmaster myself, but I just took a look at the script and,
unless I'm missing something, it does appear that this feature is missing
from portmaster. There an option to create backup packages, but nothing to
automatically
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:53:03PM -0400, michael johnson wrote:
> freshports.org could also give you a good idea of whats popular.
It does -- of the sample population of people that know about it.
(fwiw, it also has a lot of stale entries, as people don't keep their
lists up to date.)
Of course
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 02:22:45PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:53:03PM -0400, michael johnson wrote:
> > freshports.org could also give you a good idea of whats popular.
>
> It does -- of the sample population of people that know about it.
>
> (fwiw, it also has a lot
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:29:45PM +0200, Lars Mainka wrote:
> Hi lx,
>
> there seems to be a small bug in the FreeBSD port of libssh2.
I've submitted a PR with a patch. Thanks!
-David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Doug Barton wrote:
B Briggs wrote:
Rene Ladan wrote:
Hi,
what about the idea of using 'make config-conditional' instead of 'make
config' in portmaster to configure ports? This way
/var/db/ports/*/options is respected.
The downside is that you have to run 'make rmconfig' in order to
reconfigu
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 07:45:06PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 02:22:45PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:53:03PM -0400, michael johnson wrote:
...
> OK is when such ports find their way into release CDs, while others
> (like SDL) do not.
Unle
B Briggs wrote:
> The problem is that if unattended, you will not know if the port was
> deleted especially if you have a lot of output. This can lead to a lot
> of other problems. I've looked at the script, and it seems that you
> could break it down into (something like) these steps:
>
> make (
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 21:13:45 +0200 regisr wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:09:21 +0400
> Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> > Firts of, consider reading /usr/ports/UPDATING "20060616: AFFECTS
> > users of emulation/linux_base-*". If none of suggestions help you than
> > write your result
B Briggs wrote:
> The problem is that if unattended, you will not know if the port was
> deleted especially if you have a lot of output.
I should have added in my previous reply that your statement above is not
accurate. If the install fails, that invocation of portmaster will fail,
which will c
Doug Barton wrote:
B Briggs wrote:
The problem is that if unattended, you will not know if the port was
deleted especially if you have a lot of output.
I should have added in my previous reply that your statement above is not
accurate. If the install fails, that invocation of portmaster will
Actually, this is on our TODO list, and will be considered a seperate
'opt-in' from the 'devices' stats, so that ppl can participate without
having to "do it all" ...
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
Hello,
Firstly, great movement and thanks for doing this. However, I think
id
One of my continuing projects is to reassign ports from inactive maintainers,
so that committers don't have to wait for the 2 week timeout period before
committing (or so that other interested people can become the maintainers).
A couple of months ago I sent out email to over 100 maintainers who h
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Firstly, great movement and thanks for doing this. However, I think
> idea of BSD statistics project can be extended over packages as well.
>
> Right now it often comes to frustration to see, i.e., tons of rarely
> used by anyone packages on 4 distribution CDs,
31 matches
Mail list logo
