On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 10:13 -0300, Joey Mingrone wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Resetting the configuration did allow me to install iwi-firmware.
> Thanks Darren.
>
> I've tried the docs at:
> http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ipw/iwi-freebsd.html but they don't
> seem to apply?
>
> I added iwi_enable="YE
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:08:25 -0600
Jason Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi FreeBSD professionals,
>
>
> Pls note that I received this error msg when trying to run portsdb
> -Uu on my gateway 450 laptop.
>
>
>
> ==
> The error:
>
> [EMAIL
What does 'ifconfig iwi0' shows? iwi0 has to exist before you call the
script.
No, iwi0 doesn't exist. Nothing under ifconfig or 'dmesg | grep iwi'
Is the kernel module an option, or should I build a new kenel?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 09:54 -0300, Joey Mingrone wrote:
> > What does 'ifconfig iwi0' shows? iwi0 has to exist before you call the
> > script.
> >
>
> No, iwi0 doesn't exist. Nothing under ifconfig or 'dmesg | grep iwi'
> Is the kernel module an option, or should I build a new kenel?
Either add
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:24:08 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/25/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:50:52 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Au
Doug Barton wrote:
B Briggs wrote:
[snip]
Unfortunately my ports were up to date except for openoffice.org-2.0
which I had listed as HOLD_PKGS in pkgtools.conf. Anyway, I let it run
and it stopped because it wanted to install linux-sun-jdk14 (You get the
manual fetch message in IGNORE=), which
Sorry to have to reply to my own post, but:
B Briggs wrote:
Like I said, running for a few days now, and no problems. The main
difference that I can see is what happens with +REQUIRED_BY with
portupgrade tools. For instance:
make deinstall && make install does not seem to update +REQUIRED_BY,
The GCC compiler suite includes above mentioned man pages. Current GCC
ports just remove them after installation. I'd like to keep them
installed in a non-conflicting manner, but versioning doesn't seem like
the best idea: man 7 gpl-gnat-gcc41? Or: man 7 fsf-funding-gnat-gcc41?
What do you thi
On 8/24/06, Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:19:40 -0700
othermark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> I have a port that I'm working on that, in addition to the binaries it
> generates, it generates the following:
>
> - C api, includes, libraries
> - perl api
> - t
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:12:57 +0400
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> Please, man :-) Look this up:
> PYTHONPREFIX_SITELIBDIR
> SITE_PERL_REL
>
> As for Tcl, you can install it into ${PREFIX}/{include,lib}/${PORTNAME}
>
>
Ok, sorry if it offended someone. This was induced b
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:53:58 +0200
Karel Miklav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> The GCC compiler suite includes above mentioned man pages. Current GCC
> ports just remove them after installation. I'd like to keep them
> installed in a non-conflicting manner, but versioning doesn't seem like
>
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:30:58 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Okay, good point. I haven't check in your four suggests again So... I
> was thinking about maybe can do something like what we (FreeBSD GNOME
> Team) did with INSTALLS_OMF in bsd.gnome.mk (747 line). Twea
12 matches
Mail list logo
