Ian A. Tegebo wrote:
> Does anyone on this list have any input?
>
> --
> ian
>
> - Forwarded message from "Ian A. Tegebo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:40:43 -0700
> From: "Ian A. Tegebo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: www/rt36 wi
When it will be commited? How long to wait?
Past...
--
*Date: * Fri, 7 Jul 2006 01:35:09 GMT
*From: * Cheng-Lung Sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To: * [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject: * Re: ports/99862:
Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After recently cvsuping my ports tree, enlightenment-devel failts to
> compile with:
>
> -f ".deps/e_entry_dialog.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../src/bin
> -I../../src/lib -DUSE_E_CONFIG_H -I/usr/X11R6/include
> -I/usr/
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:42:40PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I hoped I had learned something about using gettext in ports,
> > and felt I should write down a summary. Here's what came out
> > of that -- a proposed section for the Porter's Handbook. Its
> >
Hi,
I decided to give portmaster a try to get rid of ${PORTSDIR}/INDEX*db
and /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db. It works quite nice, but IMO there is a
inconsistency in the -d option:
after vim got updated from 7.0.x to 7.0.66, portmaster -a -d deleted
vim/vim-6.4.tar.bz2 (which is still an up-to-date distf
Adrian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After recently cvsuping my ports tree, enlightenment-devel failts to
> compile with:
>
> ...
Did you update the dependencies before you tried to build it?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
What is the output of:
$ cd /usr/ports/net/iwi-firmware && make -V OSVERSION
600034
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Dear multimedia team:
I have built Handbrake successfully using the old port (0.7.1) but
cannot get it to compile with the new version 0.7.1_1. The output
from portupgrade is as attached to this email.
Apparently, I have problems compiling the libhb (which I figure is a
handbrake library
Hey guys,
Resetting the configuration did allow me to install iwi-firmware.
Thanks Darren.
I've tried the docs at:
http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ipw/iwi-freebsd.html but they don't
seem to apply?
I added iwi_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf and tried running '>
/etc/rc.d/iwi start' and the output
I can't help thinking that the way we're trying to deal with
locale directories is far from optimal. IMHO, there are
several ways to improve the state of things:
1. Add more locales
We can add all those locales found in the same mtree
file under nls, and all less specific locales. I.e. if
aa_BB.C
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't help thinking that the way we're trying to deal with
locale directories is far from optimal. IMHO, there are
several ways to improve the state of things:
I think the current how we handle locale is a bit
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:42:29 -0500, Till Haselmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear multimedia team:
I have built Handbrake successfully using the old port (0.7.1) but
cannot get it to compile with the new version 0.7.1_1. The output
from portupgrade is as attached to this email.
Apparently,
On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't help thinking that the way we're trying to deal with
> locale directories is far from optimal. IMHO, there are
> several ways to improve the state of
Any ideas what I am doing wrong ?
I even had a look in the libnet functions and they are defined so I
don't understand what's happening, anyone else who has come across this
and found a solution please let me know
make
===> WARNING: Vulnerability database out of date, checking anyway
===> Extrac
I have a port that I'm working on that, in addition to the binaries it
generates, it generates the following:
- C api, includes, libraries
- perl api
- tcl api
- python api
it also has java and rexx extensions, but I'm not going to add those until
later.
My question revolves around respecting
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:50:52 +0400
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I can't help thinking that the way we're trying to deal
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:19:40 -0700
othermark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> I have a port that I'm working on that, in addition to the binaries it
> generates, it generates the following:
>
> - C api, includes, libraries
> - perl api
> - tcl api
> - python api
>
> it also has java and rexx ext
B Briggs wrote:
> After reading some of the comments on a prior thread about "the best"
> port update tool, I decided to give portmaster a look.
Thanks!
> Unfortunately my ports were up to date except for openoffice.org-2.0
> which I had listed as HOLD_PKGS in pkgtools.conf. Anyway, I let it run
Rene Ladan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I decided to give portmaster a try to get rid of ${PORTSDIR}/INDEX*db
> and /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db. It works quite nice, but IMO there is a
> inconsistency in the -d option:
>
> after vim got updated from 7.0.x to 7.0.66, portmaster -a -d deleted
> vim/vim-6.4.tar.bz2 (
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:51:56 -0500, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've created a patch that has the dependency list change, plus the
experimental work I'm doing on trying to handle alternate dependencies
via
CONFLICTS. It's at
http://dougbarton.us/portmaster-conflicts-depends.patch
On 8/24/06, Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:50:52 +0400
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:09:33 +0400
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> On 8/24/06, Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:50:52 +0400
> > "Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> >
> > > On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:50:52 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't help thinking that the way we're trying to deal with
> locale di
Hi FreeBSD professionals,
Pls note that I received this error msg when trying to run portsdb -Uu on my
gateway 450 laptop.
==
The error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sudo portsdb -Uu
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait.."/
John E Hein wrote:
Gábor Kövesdán wrote at 21:44 +0200 on Aug 23, 2006:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > mount_nullfs ${PORTSDIR} ${DESTDIR}${PORTSDIR}
> > mount_nullfs ${WRKDIR} ${DESTDIR}${WRKDIR}
> > mount_devfs foo ${DESTDIR}/dev
> > chroot ${DESTDIR} cd ${.CURDIR} && make install
> >
> > A
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:51:56 -0500, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> I've created a patch that has the dependency list change, plus the
>> experimental work I'm doing on trying to handle alternate dependencies
>> via
>> CONFLICTS. It's at
>> http://dougbarto
Doug Barton schreef:
> Rene Ladan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I decided to give portmaster a try to get rid of ${PORTSDIR}/INDEX*db
>> and /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db. It works quite nice, but IMO there is a
>> inconsistency in the -d option:
>>
>> after vim got updated from 7.0.x to 7.0.66, portmaster -a -d del
On 8/25/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:50:52 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/24/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:26:53 -0500, Andrew Pantyukhin
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I can'
On 8/24/06, Stanislav Sedov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:09:33 +0400
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Again, you don't really mean it. Try installing any p5 port into
> a non-localbase prefix, and you'll see that lib/perl5 and Co. will
> be left over after
29 matches
Mail list logo
