Re: FreeBSD Port: finance/gnucash

Peter Jeremy wrote: On Wed, 2006-Jul-26 08:06:22 -0300, consumidor wrote: as you may know, gnucash had a significant upgrade a few weeks ago now it's base on gnome2 is the port on the works? if so, is there any schedule? There's no maintainer so it's up to someone (eg you) to provide a PR that

Re: New portmaster version available for testing/feedback

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've just uploaded a new version of portmaster to http://dougbarton.us/portmaster that in addition to the stuff from the message below, also implements the following: 1. Fix handling of [/usr/ports/]foo/bar as second option to -o 2. Correctly handle

linux-opera does not work after updating linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4

Good Day. I have a problem with linux-opera. After updating linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4 linux-opera does not start with the following messages on the screen: $ linux-opera /usr/X11R6/share/linux-opera/bin/opera: /usr/lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3.4' not found (required by /usr/X11R6/li

devel/rlwrap PTY problems

Hi, rlwrap is failing "rlwrap: error: Could not open master pty: Input/output error" on FreeBSD 6.1. Upon investigation, I see that the configure script is hardcoding the list of PTYs to scan based upon those found in /dev/ at time of compilation. This obviously does not work well with devfs. S

Re: devel/rlwrap PTY problems

Phil Pennock wrote: > Hi, > > rlwrap is failing "rlwrap: error: Could not open master pty: > Input/output error" on FreeBSD 6.1. > > Upon investigation, I see that the configure script is hardcoding the > list of PTYs to scan based upon those found in /dev/ at time of > compilation. This obviously

Re: linux-opera does not work after updating linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 01:40:36PM +0300, Maxim P. Kondakov wrote: > Good Day. > > I have a problem with linux-opera. > After updating linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4 linux-opera does not start > with the following messages on the screen: > > [...] > > I can not install default linux_base port

Re: Checksum mismatch for print/teTeX-texmf

Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:24:17AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: Running portupgrade with current ports from cvs, I got this failure - print/teTeX-texmf (teTeX-texmf-3.0_3) (checksum mismatch). I also had checksum mismatchs for multimedia/mplayer-skins, but I was able to get

New port suggestion: net/etrace

Hi there, I've cobbled together a port, in line with the handbook (I hope), for a network tool called 'etrace' (http://www.bintshell.net/tools/etrace). Pretty useful for probing networks, which has proved to be quiet useful on pen tests, network surveys, troubleshooting, etc. I've contacted the

Re: New port suggestion: net/etrace

On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 01:01:52AM +0200, David Ryan wrote: > If there is a "port submission" process, please tell me to RTFM! I will > gladly oblige once pointed in said direction. The two relevant links are: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/index.html http://www

Eclipse 3.2

I have successfully compiled and run eclipse 3.2 on my system. I have started building the patches and pre/post scripts to make it a freebsd port. Can someone tell what freebsd returns for the arch on a 64bit machine? I know linux usually will return x86_64. If it returns amd64 I will have to make

port filezilla on FreeBSD

Hi all: I made a port of filezilla on FreeBSD. Here is the shar file http://chinsan2.twbbs.org/chinsan/filezilla.shar But, I do not wanna to be the maintainer of filezilla. Hope someone is willing to be the maintainer. ;-) Usage: cd /usr/ports/ftp fetch http://chinsan2.twbbs.org/chinsan/filezi

Ruby vulnerability?

Hi, FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will soon? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0604.html http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694 cheers, -- Joel Hatton -- In

Re: Any success with bacula and DVD

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:11:11 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: > Is anybody successfully using bacula with DVD? When I install the > bacula-server port, it cannot pass even the trivial > "btape FileStorage/temp" test, let alone trying to write to DVD. > Advice cheerfully accepted!

Re: Eclipse 3.2

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:37:18 -0400 "David Sledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > I have successfully compiled and run eclipse 3.2 on my system. I have > started building the patches and pre/post scripts to make it a > freebsd port. Can someone tell what freebsd returns for the arch on a > 64bit