On Tuesday 25 July 2006 20:51, Robert Huff wrote:
> Running:
>
> FreeBSD jerusalem.litteratus.org 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0:
> Mon Jul 24 11:29:26 EDT 2006
>
> suddenly last night I get this as part of the nightly run:
>
> huff@>> /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Uu
> Updating the port
Derrick Edwards píše v út 25. 07. 2006 v 21:08 -0400:
> Previously I could download and delete pictures off of my camera using
> digikam. Lately, I notice that I could not delete the pictures after I
> upgrading digikam and gphoto2. From what I have read on the net it is
> probbably a gphoto2
Ken Williams wrote:
> Interesting - another MakeMaker weirdness I guess?
>
> John: here's a bug report I'm passing along for version.pm, not sure
> what the deal is. On my machine I've confirmed that 'perl Makefile.PL;
> make;' doesn't produce any man pages in blib/ with version.pm 0.652.
>
> -
gentlemen,
as you may know, gnucash had a significant upgrade a few weeks ago
now it's base on gnome2
is the port on the works? if so, is there any schedule?
tia,
joseph karma
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
On Wed, 2006-Jul-26 08:06:22 -0300, consumidor wrote:
>as you may know, gnucash had a significant upgrade a few weeks ago
>now it's base on gnome2
>is the port on the works? if so, is there any schedule?
There's no maintainer so it's up to someone (eg you) to provide a
PR that contains the upgrade
I use FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE , Apache22 + PHP5 and MYSQL5. After installation of my
MySQL, Apache22, and PHP5-extension from ports, the apache web server is
starting up in FreeBSD system, Apache loads succcessfully and web server
functioning properly, but the following warning error occurs:
[warn] (
Beech Rintoul writes:
> > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
> > wait.."/usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk", line 353: WITH_FORTRAN and
> > WITHOUT_FORTRAN can't both be set. ===> lang/gfortran failed
> > *** Error code 1
> > 1 error
> >
> >I was going to rack this up to a
This patch introduces a very simple, but handy (imho) framework
into bsd.sites.mk:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros.diff
1. (A tad) cleaner ports Makefiles:
Write MASTER_SITES=FOOBAR instead of
MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_FOOBAR} and get away
with it
2. Abbreviations
Write M
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:18 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> This patch introduces a very simple, but handy (imho) framework
> into bsd.sites.mk:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros.diff
>
> 1. (A tad) cleaner ports Makefiles:
> Write MASTER_SITES=FOOBAR instead of
> MASTER
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:37:37PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:18 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> >
> > 1. (A tad) cleaner ports Makefiles:
> > Write MASTER_SITES=FOOBAR instead of
> > MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_FOOBAR} and get away
> > with it
> >
> > 2. Abbreviati
Running portupgrade with current ports from cvs, I got this failure -
print/teTeX-texmf (teTeX-texmf-3.0_3) (checksum mismatch). I also had
checksum mismatchs for multimedia/mplayer-skins, but I was able to get
past that by rm'ing the config and using only the default skin.
Anyone know anythi
On 7/26/06, Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:37:37PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:18 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > 2. Abbreviations
> > Write MASTER_SITES=SF and mean SOURCEFORGE
>
> I don't quite like having 3 different ways to u
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:24:17AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Running portupgrade with current ports from cvs, I got this failure -
> print/teTeX-texmf (teTeX-texmf-3.0_3) (checksum mismatch). I also had
> checksum mismatchs for multimedia/mplayer-skins, but I was able to get
> past that by r
#portupgrade -R netatalk
install: /usr/ports/net/netatalk/work/netatalk-2.0.3/netatalk.sh: No such file
or directory
*** Error code 71
Stop in /usr/ports/net/netatalk.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/net/netatalk.
David
--
Sure the Almighty created the world in only six days,
but He didn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David J Brooks wrote:
> #portupgrade -R netatalk
>
> install: /usr/ports/net/netatalk/work/netatalk-2.0.3/netatalk.sh: No such
> file
> or directory
> *** Error code 71
>
> Stop in /usr/ports/net/netatalk.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ports/98753 is asking if there is a GCCVERSION hook so one can patch
based on the value. ports/58317 suggests that one does indeed exist but
the submitter can't find one. I'm still pretty green so don't know the
answer myself either. Any help apprec
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:21:51 -0600
Aaron Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ports/98753 is asking if there is a GCCVERSION hook so one can patch
> based on the value. ports/58317 suggests that one does indeed exist
> but the submitter can'
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:35:46 +0400
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Thanks, I'm really tired of typing it.
You could use any available preprocessor (M4 e.g.), if your fingers
are tired so much ;-)
--
Stanislav Sedov MBSD labs, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Россия,
On Wed, 2006-Jul-26 12:21:51 -0600, Aaron Dalton wrote:
>ports/98753 is asking if there is a GCCVERSION hook so one can patch
>based on the value. ports/58317 suggests that one does indeed exist but
>the submitter can't find one. I'm still pretty green so don't know the
>answer myself either. An
19 matches
Mail list logo
