Re: GCC with GNAT Ada compiler

Hi! Karel, thanks for your efforts. You did it much better than I managed to. ;-) On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:25:20 +0200 Karel Miklav wrote: I can't answer to your questions, but can comment on the ports. > Ports are at: > - http://lovetemple.net/gnat-gcc.tbz For i386: gnat-gcc41 seems to have

Error building p5-BerkeleyDB-0.29

I get an error while updating the port. ===> Building for p5-BerkeleyDB-0.29 cp BerkeleyDB.pm blib/lib/BerkeleyDB.pm AutoSplitting blib/lib/BerkeleyDB.pm (blib/lib/auto/BerkeleyDB) cp BerkeleyDB/Hash.pm blib/lib/BerkeleyDB/Hash.pm cp BerkeleyDB.pod blib/lib/BerkeleyDB.pod cp BerkeleyDB/Btree.pm b

/usr/ports/mail/exact and Segmentation fault

Hello Ports-Maintainers. I have a problem with /usr/ports/mail/exact on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE i386. It gives me a segmentation fault if I just start it: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/exact.sh start Segmentation fault (core dumped) Some helping hints for me? I'd be glad. Bye and TIA, Sebastian Some mor

Squid 2.6 issues

Hi! I'd like to thank you for the quick response to squid 2.6 release. I tried your patches and installed it in production today, but some major problems made me revert to 2.5. 1. I use transparent squid with ipfw. I don't enable PF or IPF transparent options. But without them, squid doesn't see

Re: print/cups-base 1.2.0_2 and locally connected printer

Rick Voland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> "Bruce A. Mah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> If memory serves me right, David MAREC wrote: Is there new device policies defined by cups ? >>> I noticed that the cups port now installs a cups user and group. I >>> in

Re: Squid 2.6 issues

* Andrew Pantyukhin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi! > > I'd like to thank you for the quick response to squid 2.6 > release. I tried your patches and installed it in production > today, but some major problems made me revert to 2.5. > > 1. I use transparent squid with ipfw. I don't enable PF or > IPF

py-punjab

Hi list, Port py-punjab (ports/net-im/py-punjab) has been removid from ports collection? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: py-punjab

On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 05:27:55PM -0300, Márcio Luciano Donada wrote: > Port py-punjab (ports/net-im/py-punjab) has been removid from ports > collection? cvsweb does not report it having been in the Ports Collection, nor is there an entry in MOVED. There is a pending PR to create one, however:

Re: GCC with GNAT Ada compiler

Boris Samorodov wrote: For i386: gnat-gcc41 seems to have some issues with pkg-plist file, some directories are not empty when deinstalling. For amd64: gnat-gcc34 has a typo: "elif" should be used instead of "elsif" when checking for the alpha ARCH. Thank you Boris for your report. It would

Re: GCC with GNAT Ada compiler

On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 22:52:50 +0200 Karel Miklav wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > For i386: gnat-gcc41 seems to have some issues with pkg-plist file, > > some directories are not empty when deinstalling. > > > > For amd64: gnat-gcc34 has a typo: "elif" should be used instead of > > "elsif" when c

[HEADSUP] coda5/coda6 support

The coda ports have been failing to build for a while on both 5-STABLE and 6-STABLE. There are packages for 5.5 and 6.1 so this must have been something fairly recent. However, when investigating these errors, I found that coda5 is no longer even fetchable from the mastersite, and the coda6 bits

[HEADSUP] latest round of bsd.*.mk changes committed

The latest round of changes to bsd.*.mk fixes some minor problems (USE_LDCONFIG with non-default PREFIX; fix DESKTOP_ENTRIES on 4.x) but the change most visible to committers and maintainers will be the replacement of a number of usages of BROKEN in those files with IGNORE. This specifically applie

Fixing VNC port(s) for AMD64

So I'm new to AMD64 and was surprised by the lack of VNC support for this platform. Its been a while since I've hacked ports (like more years than I have fingers on one hand), but I figured it couldn't be that hard to fix up one of the VNC ports and submit my work back. Boy was I wrong. I did ge

Re: GCC with GNAT Ada compiler

Boris Samorodov wrote: BTW, gnat-gcc34 is for i386 only. Does checking for other archs at makefile mean that at the near future the port won't be i386 only? I tried to keep things from other GCC ports I do not fully understand or can not test in. Limitation on i386 architecture counts in case y

i386 packages on amd64

[[ please redirect this if this isn't the right place ]] I'd like to install OpenOffice on my amd64 box. All attempts that I've made to compile it have failed. Usually due to java compilation issues. So, I thought I'd install the i386 binaries from the package cluster snapshots on the amd64 box.