make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.: Resource temporarily unavailable

> No, that's just a NOP. > If anyone can still reproduce this please tell us how. > > Kris its unclear but I get this message very often when installing a package from the ports tree. ruby18_static for example, just happened. basically this step ===> Registering installation for ruby_s

Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?

Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > > I don't think that old portupgrade uses wrong database format. You > changed the default version of Berkeley DB, silently: Not silently. If you track ports@ you could see my messages. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.

Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?

Bert van de Grift wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:15:56AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: >> Bert van de Grift wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:48:39AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Daniel Dvor(a'k wrote: > > Fixing the pkgdb.db does not help me at all. > It's a known iss

Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?

Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >> On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:15:56 +0400 >> Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > sem> See my HANDS-UP message a couples days ago at the list. > sem> Old (<=2.1.1,2) portupgrade use wrong (may be a right word will - > sem> "unexpected") database format

RE: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-4.54.6_2

On Saturday, July 01, 2006 11:08 PM James L. Day wrote: > partition running out of space during scans of large messages. I > recommend that it be changed to "/var/tmp". First of all thanks for your suggestion. I have to agree with the others though and will leave it pointing to /tmp. If y

FreeBSD Port: uebimiau-2.7.10

Hello, in this port you forget the php5-session-5.1.4 dependancy. Bye, Giovanni ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?

On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:00:09PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > I've written you should remove "the file and INDEX*.db". The file was > pkgdb.db in your context. So you should remove *both* files. OK - Thanks. Portupgrade works fine now. -- Bert van de Grift http://www.vdgrift.org GPG Key:

Re: portupgrade portupgrade leaves an error....

On Fri 2006-06-30 (20:44), Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > pkg_delete portupgrade-whatever the number, pkg_add -r portupgrade. This gets > you an older version of portupgrade. > > I ran into the same problem today. It's a way around the problem until it's > fixed. i tried that: # pkg_delete portup

Bison 1 and 2

While upgrading vlc-0.8.4a_2 to vlc-0.8.5_2 I ran into : ===> bison-1.75_2,1 conflicts with installed package(s): bison-2.1_2 In /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk I see for bison : .if defined(USE_BISON) BUILD_DEPENDS+= bison:${PORTSDIR}/devel/bison .endif I changed this into: .if defined(USE_B

Re: tcl84 port upgrade fails in test

"Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have been unable to update tcl8.4 on my laptop running -current. I > have one other system running -current, but it installed the upgrade > correctly. It compiles without error, but if fails in the tests. Same here on RELENG_6 (aka. -STABLE), althou

Re: tcl84 port upgrade fails in test

I have the same problem, all my boxes are running 6.1-STABLE but some install, some wont. On 7/3/06, Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have been unable to update tcl8.4 on my laptop running -current. I > have one other system running -cur

Re: FreeBSD Port: security/denyhosts

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:55:55 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:32:25PM +0200, Anders Troback wrote: > > Hi there! > > > > Just installed the denyhost port but when I fire it up it's > > complains about the missing config file: > > > > # /usr/local/etc/

Re: Renaming and symlinking shared libraries

Quoting Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sat, 1 Jul 2006 20:25:22 -0300): AFAIK the symlinks would be (under lib/, in src->dest form) the following. This shows the renaming of libtest to libtest-2, with major version of 2. libtest-2.so -> libtest-2.so.2 libtest-2.so.2 -> test2/libte

misterious packaging errors

When I test port (for example, net-im/sim-im-devel) on tinderbox sometime it says that files with ".a" extension should be listed in pkg-list, but port doesn't have this files (it has only *.la). Here is example: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64

Re: Bison 1 and 2

On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:17:02 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hans Lambermont) wrote: > While upgrading vlc-0.8.4a_2 to vlc-0.8.5_2 I ran into : > > ===> bison-1.75_2,1 conflicts with installed package(s): > bison-2.1_2 > > In /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk I see for bison : > > .if defined(USE_BISON)

RE: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?

You did it, okay, thank you, but late :( I always before upgrading something, go to /usr/ports and watch the UPDATING file, simple there was nothing about portupgrade, nothing at the bigging of June nothing at the end of June or at the bigging of July. I am sorry that I do not read almost everyth

RE: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?

So delete /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db /var/db/pkgdb.fixme /usr/ports/INDEX-6.db there are not another INDEX*.db files. Right ? and after that what to do ? Thank you Daniel > -Original Message- > From: Bert van de Grift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 10:56 AM > To: Se

Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?

On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:27:47PM +0200, Stay d wrote: > So delete /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db > /var/db/pkgdb.fixme > /usr/ports/INDEX-6.db > there are not another INDEX*.db files. > Right ? Right > and after that what to do ? I did a portversion -v which will rebuild the databases... -- Bert van

Re: portupgrade portupgrade leaves an error....

On Monday 03 July 2006 04:01, gareth wrote: > On Fri 2006-06-30 (20:44), Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > > pkg_delete portupgrade-whatever the number, pkg_add -r portupgrade. This > > gets you an older version of portupgrade. > > > > I ran into the same problem today. It's a way around the problem until

Current unassigned ports problem reports

Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has

Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?

Stay d wrote: > You did it, okay, thank you, but late :( > > I always before upgrading something, go to /usr/ports and watch the UPDATING > file, simple there was nothing about portupgrade, nothing at the bigging of > June nothing at the end of June or at the bigging of July. > > I am sorry that

RE: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?

Okay, I am sorry if I am rude. I admire your work, portupgrade is my favourite port. :) I am just user and my endeavour to portupgrade is "near zero". I just do to remind, that /usr/ports/UPDATING is main place, where user must be informed at the first time. Thank you for your work, have a nice

RE: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?

Perfect, it works ! > -Original Message- > From: Bert van de Grift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:50 PM > To: Stay d > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me > please, the port in short time is broken again, what d

Re: network

On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:59:48PM -0700, Mihir Sanghavi wrote: > hi, > I want to set up my network but donot know how to do. Can some explain me > in detail please.thanks > Is FreeBSD handbook not useful for you? -- Best regards, Arseny Nasokin

Re: Renaming and symlinking shared libraries

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 11:40:27 +0200 Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sat, 1 Jul 2006 > 20:25:22 -0300): > > > AFAIK the symlinks would be (under lib/, in src->dest form) the > > foll

Anyone still using x11-wm/fluxbox?

Hello folks, Fluxbox is now at 1.0rc2, so it is near ready to move from fluxbox-devel to fluxbox. I am wondering if there is any users that still are using x11-wm/fluxbox (0.1.14)? If yes, then I am happy to move from fluxbox to something like fluxbox-old (got any better name?) but I will n

[DADVSI] aMule ports : looking for a new maintainer

Hi folks, I'm sorry to inform you that I've decided to stop maintaining the 2 aMule ports net-p2p/amule1 and net-p2p/amule2. I created them about 3 years ago and have been maintaining them since. I live in France and it has become too dangerous for me to maintain them. The new "DADVSI" law has ju

Re: [DADVSI] aMule ports : looking for a new maintainer

Sigh, yet another one of our governments "helping" us. Thank you for your work so far; I'll take the PR and commit. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "

Re: print/cups-base 1.2.0_2 and locally connected printer

If memory serves me right, David MAREC wrote: > Le lundi 26 juin 2006 04:18, Rick Voland a écrit : > >> It seems to be a permissions thing. > > I have the same problem running FreeBSD 6.1. > A few weeks ago, «cups» stopped printing through local ports while «lpd» > dæmon was still working. > (

Re: print/cups-base 1.2.0_2 and locally connected printer

"Bruce A. Mah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If memory serves me right, David MAREC wrote: >> Is there new device policies defined by cups ? >> > I noticed that the cups port now installs a cups user and group. I > infer from that change that some portion of cups now runs as a > non-privileged us

Re: New version of portmaster available

Doug Barton wrote: > 3. Add -o option to replace an installed port with a new port from a > different location (e.g., portmaster -o emulators/linux_base-fc4 > linux_base) The second argument can also be specified as the name of > the installed port (e.g., linux_base-8-8.0_15) Can this be tricked

Re: PHP 5.1.4 w/ mysqli dumps core - SOLVED?

At 02:36 AM 7/3/2006, Riemer Palstra wrote: On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:07:49AM -0400, Rob Szarka wrote: > Thanks for the tip about the version. I didn't realize the 5.1 tree > was development. That would probably be because it isn't. http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/choosing-version.html

Re: PHP 5.1.4 w/ mysqli dumps core - SOLVED?

On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 05:38:20PM -0400, Rob Szarka wrote: > http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/choosing-version.html says > > "MySQL 5.1 is the current development release series." Ah sorry, I was thinking about PHP. Yes, indeed, MySQL 5.1 is still Development :) -- Riemer Palstra

Re: Anyone still using x11-wm/fluxbox?

On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:42:20 -0500 "Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello folks, > > Fluxbox is now at 1.0rc2, so it is near ready to move from fluxbox-devel > to fluxbox. I am wondering if there is any users that still are using > x11-wm/fluxbox (0.1.14)? If yes, then I am hap

Re: print/cups-base 1.2.0_2 and locally connected printer

Heino Tiedemann wrote: > "Bruce A. Mah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If memory serves me right, David MAREC wrote: >>> Is there new device policies defined by cups ? >>> >> I noticed that the cups port now installs a cups user and group. I >> infer from that change that some portion of cups no

Re: Renaming and symlinking shared libraries

Quoting Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:29:07 -0300): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 11:40:27 +0200 Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Quoting Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sat, 1 Jul 2006 20:25:22 -03