On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:10:44 -0500, Alexey Shuvaev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:35:20PM -0400, Randy Pratt wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:16:35 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree for 'which' is best thing to do. Not all shells (csh, see in
>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:35:20PM -0400, Randy Pratt wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:16:35 -0500
> "Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I agree for 'which' is best thing to do. Not all shells (csh, see in
> > builtin(1)) have 'hash' stuff. I have bring all of hash -> which stuff
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:16:35 -0500
"Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree for 'which' is best thing to do. Not all shells (csh, see in
> builtin(1)) have 'hash' stuff. I have bring all of hash -> which stuff
> from 1.0.0, so let me know patches work for you.
>
> http://peopl
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:52:49 -0500, Alexey Shuvaev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
The script fluxbox-generate_menu shipped with current versions of
fluxbox (fluxbox-1.1.0.1_1 and 1.1.1 too, I think) produces
menu with all known programs. The reason for it is find_it* family
of functions us
Hello!
The script fluxbox-generate_menu shipped with current versions of
fluxbox (fluxbox-1.1.0.1_1 and 1.1.1 too, I think) produces
menu with all known programs. The reason for it is find_it* family
of functions used to determine if the program exists (see attached test.sh).
It expects that 'hash
