2009/8/6 Mel Flynn :
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009 20:08:55 Doug Barton wrote:
>> Ok, so now I'm up to the point where starting contool give me this:
>>
>> contool
>> Assertion failed: (ret != inval_id), function _XAllocID, file
>> xcb_io.c, line 378.
>> Abort trap: 6 (core dumped)
>
> You get a be
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 20:08:55 Doug Barton wrote:
> Ok, so now I'm up to the point where starting contool give me this:
>
> contool
> Assertion failed: (ret != inval_id), function _XAllocID, file
> xcb_io.c, line 378.
> Abort trap: 6 (core dumped)
You get a better a log if you install contoo
Ok, so now I'm up to the point where starting contool give me this:
contool
Assertion failed: (ret != inval_id), function _XAllocID, file
xcb_io.c, line 378.
Abort trap: 6 (core dumped)
gdb log attached
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
$ gdb /usr/local/bin/contool contool.
Tom Uffner wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> I thought contool looked interesting so I tried build it. It requires
>> xview, which fails as follows on a fairly recent -current (8.0-BETA2
>> r195917: Mon Jul 27 16:09:24 PDT 2009):
>
> i posted an ugly workaround for this a few days ago, which started
Doug Barton wrote:
I thought contool looked interesting so I tried build it. It requires
xview, which fails as follows on a fairly recent -current (8.0-BETA2
r195917: Mon Jul 27 16:09:24 PDT 2009):
i posted an ugly workaround for this a few days ago, which started this
thread, and Mel Flynn rep
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tom Uffner wrote:
>> Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
>>
>>> Can't xconsole do the job for you instead of contool?
>> more or less. i am using xconsole by default. however i prefer contool
>> because it has the following features which
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tom Uffner wrote:
> Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
>
>> Can't xconsole do the job for you instead of contool?
>
> more or less. i am using xconsole by default. however i prefer contool
> because it has the following features which are missing from every other
> X con
Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
Can't xconsole do the job for you instead of contool?
more or less. i am using xconsole by default. however i prefer contool
because it has the following features which are missing from every other
X console program that I am aware of:
1. it can remain iconified
