On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 09:39:39AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> On 08/19/17 06:01, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > In fairness, this may be an "apple vs. orange" comparison. But it's
> > fairly unusual (in my experience) for poudriere to fail to build a port,
> > but when it's a port that I had just built succ
On 08/19/17 06:01, David Wolfskill wrote:
In fairness, this may be an "apple vs. orange" comparison. But it's
fairly unusual (in my experience) for poudriere to fail to build a port,
but when it's a port that I had just built successfully (using
portmaster) on my laptop... well, I thought it was
On 08/19/17 06:01, David Wolfskill wrote:
In fairness, this may be an "apple vs. orange" comparison. But it's
fairly unusual (in my experience) for poudriere to fail to build a port,
but when it's a port that I had just built successfully (using
portmaster) on my laptop... well, I thought it was
I can also confirm I an having problems with this. With the exact same
error.
Den 19 aug. 2017 3:01 em skrev "David Wolfskill" :
> In fairness, this may be an "apple vs. orange" comparison. But it's
> fairly unusual (in my experience) for poudriere to fail to build a port,
> but when it's a port
In fairness, this may be an "apple vs. orange" comparison. But it's
fairly unusual (in my experience) for poudriere to fail to build a port,
but when it's a port that I had just built successfully (using
portmaster) on my laptop... well, I thought it was worth mentioning.
The whine in the poudrie
