Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-11-21 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hey Franco, On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Franco Fichtner wrote: > >> On 28 Oct 2016, at 6:30 PM, Joshua Ruehlig wrote: >> >> I don't believe the maintainer dropped the project. > > I was talking about www/subsonic, sorry for the confusion: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Joshua Ruehlig
Ahh ok, sounds good. Sounds like we should just follow suit with whatever www/subsonic does. Which seems to be thus far to remove the LICENSE line. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > On 28 Oct 2016, at 6:30 PM, Joshua Ruehlig > wrote: > > > > I don't believe the main

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Vlad K.
On 2016-10-28 18:38, Franco Fichtner wrote: I was talking about www/subsonic, sorry for the confusion: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213298 This bug shows the discussion I had with the Subsonic maintainer (who is, technically, until that patch is committed, still a maint

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Franco Fichtner
> On 28 Oct 2016, at 6:30 PM, Joshua Ruehlig wrote: > > I don't believe the maintainer dropped the project. I was talking about www/subsonic, sorry for the confusion: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213298 > If a user wants to use a previous version they are free to modify t

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Joshua Ruehlig
Did you read the post Michael linked? Version 6.0 is no longer GPLv3 because he added some code that couldn't be added to a GPL project. I don't believe the maintainer dropped the project. If a user wants to use a previous version they are free to modify the PORTVERSION, update the 'distinfo', and

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Franco Fichtner
> On 28 Oct 2016, at 5:53 PM, Joshua Ruehlig wrote: > > Franco, what do you mean a maintainer drop? > Also Madsonic, which is supposedly GPL based on their website is available. The maintainer resigned, but updated to 6.0 because there were no distfiles, and the code seemed to be gone for 5.3 i

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Joshua Ruehlig
Ohh, I realize earlier I'm not the maintainer and was only CC'ed on the first email. Regardless I'll go search to see if I can find the license for subsonic 6.0. Franco, what do you mean a maintainer drop? Also Madsonic, which is supposedly GPL based on their website is available. Thanks, Josh O

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Franco Fichtner
> On 28 Oct 2016, at 4:41 PM, Joshua Ruehlig wrote: > > sure I'll take a look. I assume all I need to do is find and set the > current license? I would like to take this opportunity to ask why we have a maintainer drop whilst doing the upgrade of a free 5.3 to a proprietary 6.0. What's the log

Re: www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Joshua Ruehlig
sure I'll take a look. I assume all I need to do is find and set the current license? On Oct 28, 2016 6:41 AM, "Michael Zhilin" wrote: > Hi, > > Issue: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213299 (created > 20 days ago). > > License of www/subsonic-standalone is GPL [1], but actuall

www/subsonic-standalone license

2016-10-28 Thread Michael Zhilin
Hi, Issue: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213299 (created 20 days ago). License of www/subsonic-standalone is GPL [1], but actually this version of software (v.6) is available only as free binaries. Also it includes trial version of functionalities which can be purchased by sub