Re: www/mod_dosevasive20 vs. www/mod_evasive20

2008-01-18 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:25:32PM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:04:49PM -0800 Jeremy Chadwick mentioned: > > One of our customers pointed out to me that there's two versions of the > > mod_evasive module actively floating around in ports: > > > > ports/www/mod_evasi

Re: www/mod_dosevasive20 vs. www/mod_evasive20

2008-01-18 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:04:49PM -0800 Jeremy Chadwick mentioned: > One of our customers pointed out to me that there's two versions of the > mod_evasive module actively floating around in ports: > > ports/www/mod_evasive20 > ports/www/mod_dosevasive20 > > Based on PR 106870 and the CVS com

Re: www/mod_dosevasive20 vs. www/mod_evasive20

2008-01-14 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:04:49PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > One of our customers pointed out to me that there's two versions of the > mod_evasive module actively floating around in ports: > > ports/www/mod_evasive20 > ports/www/mod_dosevasive20 > > Based on PR 106870 and the CVS commit

www/mod_dosevasive20 vs. www/mod_evasive20

2008-01-14 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
One of our customers pointed out to me that there's two versions of the mod_evasive module actively floating around in ports: ports/www/mod_evasive20 ports/www/mod_dosevasive20 Based on PR 106870 and the CVS commit logs, it looks like a repocopy was done from mod_dosevasive20 --> mod_evasive2