Re: www/apache22 - default APACHE_PORT for 8.3/9.0

2011-06-29 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Don't open this. rt36 doesn't have it, you need to keep it until that port is removed. On 06/29/11 01:13, Steve Wills wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/28/11 19:55, Olli Hauer wrote: >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> from my perspective everything is fine for the change. >>

Re: www/apache22 - default APACHE_PORT for 8.3/9.0

2011-06-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 29/06/2011 02:13, Steve Wills wrote: > FWIW, www/p5-RTx-Statistics port can probably be removed, similar > functionality is included in RT itself now and has been for a while: > > http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/2007-October/048538.html > > and I recall reading somewhere else

Re: www/apache22 - default APACHE_PORT for 8.3/9.0

2011-06-28 Thread Olli Hauer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-28 03:40, Steve Wills wrote: > On 03/17/11 22:35, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> All, > >> apache@ has been working diligently for the last 2yrs to realize >> www/apache22 as the default. Now, we are at last nearing completion. We >> look to

Re: www/apache22 - default APACHE_PORT for 8.3/9.0

2011-06-28 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/28/11 19:55, Olli Hauer wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > from my perspective everything is fine for the change. > Maybe Philip has some additional tasks/time plannings? > > If not I will request an exp-run. > > I've placed a small overview of the las

Re: www/apache22 - default APACHE_PORT for 8.3/9.0

2011-06-27 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/17/11 22:35, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > All, > > apache@ has been working diligently for the last 2yrs to realize > www/apache22 as the default. Now, we are at last nearing completion. We > look to pull the switch within the next month or so p

www/apache22 - default APACHE_PORT for 8.3/9.0

2011-03-17 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
All, apache@ has been working diligently for the last 2yrs to realize www/apache22 as the default. Now, we are at last nearing completion. We look to pull the switch within the next month or so pending our final -exp run by portmgr@. I would like to thank everyone that helped to make this happen