Hi!
> So your not following protocol then as the mailing list should only be
> asked until after the timeout happens.
10th of January to 24th of January, so 14 days. Doesn't that count
as maintainer timeout ?
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
__
On 25/01/2016 2:31 PM, Matthew Donovan wrote:
> So your not following protocol then as the mailing list should only be
> asked until after the timeout happens.
But we also LOVE proactive people/feedback, keep being vocal Robert!
Also, if anyone would like clarification or has questions about our
So your not following protocol then as the mailing list should only be
asked until after the timeout happens.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-por
Understood. I'm trying to follow the protocol of submit bug, then ask on
freebsd-ports, and only after those two, ping the maintainer directly.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Walter Schwarzenfeld <
w.schwarzenf...@utanet.at> wrote:
> It is a maintained port. It needs approval from the maintaine
It is a maintained port. It needs approval from the maintainer.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Is there a committer that can take a look at this update. It includes Poudriere
QA logs, and I can verify that it builds correctly in my environment (
10.2-RELEASE-p10).
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206107
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.o
