El día martes, noviembre 14, 2017 a las 09:34:47a. m. -0600, Larry Rosenman
escribió:
> Why can't you update the jail?
>
The host and the jail is r318593 (Sun May 21 22:05:29 CEST 2017); and the
jail can not be much newer than the host.
For now I bumped back the port sysutils/lsof:
ave the problem with the port sysutils/lsof within poudriere. The
compilation in the jail fails because the port sysutils/lsof is HEAD
while the system in the jail of poudriere is from May 21 and there have
been a change in the struct members of struct socket which was addressed
by
I have the problem with the port sysutils/lsof within poudriere. The
compilation in the jail fails because the port sysutils/lsof is HEAD
while the system in the jail of poudriere is from May 21 and there have
been a change in the struct members of struct socket which was addressed
by changes in
Hi!
> Can a committer please look at:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202421
>
> it fixes a build-break for sysutils/lsof on head.
Done.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5
Can a committer please look at:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202421
it fixes a build-break for sysutils/lsof on head.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org
US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln
built lsof on 10 and 11 recently from current
>>> sources.
>>>
>>
>> RELENG_9. Latest for both OS and ports system.
>>
>> Hrm. can you send me the config log? I'll take a look -- likely
>> tomorrow, as I'm traveling
>> when I get o
sof is a
dependency for some widely-used ports.
Also, have you done a make clean for sysutils/lsof?
Certainly. Even removed the whole sysutils subtree and re-checked it
out. I don't actually *have* ZFS on this system, so I could hack
around
the problem easily enough, but I'd rather get
el?
>>>>>
>>>>> I've successfully built lsof on 10 and 11 recently from current
>>>>> sources.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> RELENG_9. Latest for both OS and ports system.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hrm. c
ely
tomorrow, as I'm traveling
when I get off work today.
Okay; as soon as I finish another buildworld cycle; I still think it's
likely to be something screwed up on my system, given that lsof is a
dependency for some widely-used ports.
Also, have you done a make clean for sysutils/lso
>>
>>> I've successfully built lsof on 10 and 11 recently from current
>>> sources.
>>
>> RELENG_9. Latest for both OS and ports system.
>
> Hrm. can you send me the config log? I'll take a look -- likely
> tomorrow, as I'm traveling
> when I ge
kernel,
installworld/installkernel?
I've successfully built lsof on 10 and 11 recently from current
sources.
RELENG_9. Latest for both OS and ports system.
Hrm. can you send me the config log? I'll take a look -- likely
tomorrow, as I'm traveling
when I get off work today.
Larry Rosenman writes:
> On 2014-02-28 14:34, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> I'm having trouble building lsof, because it's defining _KERNEL to pull
>> in ZFS structures, and then tries to find opt_kdtrace.h, which isn't
>> really relevant. I suspect I've messed up something in my system
>> somehow, bu
10 and 11 recently from current sources.
Larry Rosenman
sysutils/lsof maintainer
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org
US Mail: 108 Turvey Cove, Hutto, TX 78634-5688
___
fre
I'm having trouble building lsof, because it's defining _KERNEL to pull
in ZFS structures, and then tries to find opt_kdtrace.h, which isn't
really relevant. I suspect I've messed up something in my system
somehow, but I've been banging my head against this for hours over the
last few days, and I c
ddl/contrib/opensolaris/common
-I/usr/ports/sysutils/lsof/work/lsof_4.88B.freebsd/usr/src/include
-I`pwd` -c dnode2.c
In file included from dnode2.c:55:
In file included from
/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zfs_znode.h:33:
In file included from
/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/ope
rc/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/zmod
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/common/zfs
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/common
-
s/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/zmod
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/common/zfs
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/common
-I/usr/ports/sysutils/lsof/work/lsof_4.88B.freebsd/usr
n/zmod
> -I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common
> -I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/common/zfs
> -I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/common
> -I/usr/ports/sysutils/lsof/work/lsof_4.88B.freebsd/usr/src/include -I`pwd` -c
> dnode2.c
> In file included from dn
trib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/zmod
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/common/zfs
-I/usr/src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/common
-I/usr/ports/sysutils/lsof/work/lsof_4.88B.freebsd/usr/
en using nullfs" On \
.if defined(WITH_LSOF)
RUN_DEPENDS+= lsof:${PORTSDIR}/sysutils/lsof
.endif
How's that unconditionally?
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 1/23/2011 10:32 PM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before I committed this update, I have tested lsof 4.85A on 8.1 and it
> does work fine.
> I don't think it is reasonable to remove the patch and prevent 8.1
> users from using lsof.
> At least, tinderbox running 8.1 requires lsof to w
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> PLEASE revert the configure patch. It is NOT supported by the upstream
> author, intentionally as he's never run the test suite against 8.1.
>
>
> On Sat, January 22, 2011 2:46 pm, sunp...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] sysutils/ls
PLEASE revert the configure patch. It is NOT supported by the upstream
author, intentionally as he's never run the test suite against 8.1.
On Sat, January 22, 2011 2:46 pm, sunp...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] sysutils/lsof: update to 4.85A
>
> State-Changed-From-To
Hi, folks.
I'm running:
FreeBSD orion 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #6 r195343: Sat Jul 4
12:23:04 EDT 2009 r...@orion:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ORION i386
Once security/rkhunter reaches the 'Performing malware checks', there
appears to be no I/O -- this check used to take less than 2 minutes
-3893
-Original Message-
From: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 1:00 PM
To: Larry Rosenman
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: sysutils/lsof doesn't build in FreeBSD 7.1-PRE
I just upgraded the kernel.
Re
ay, October 1, 2008 8:38:06 PM
> Subject: RE: FreeBSD Port: sysutils/lsof doesn't build in FreeBSD 7.1-PRE
>
> Have you done a full buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld ?
>
>
>
> --
> Larry Rosenmanhttp://www.lerctr.org/~ler
&
: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD Port: sysutils/lsof doesn't build in FreeBSD 7.1-PRE
Hello,
---> Upgrade of sysutils/lsof started at: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:53:
Hello,
---> Upgrade of sysutils/lsof started at: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:53:25 +
---> Upgrading 'lsof-4.81A,2' to 'lsof-4.81D,2' (sysutils/lsof)
OK? [yes]
---> Build of sysutils/lsof started at: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:53:37 +0000
---> Building '/usr/ports/s
Etienne Robillard píše v ne 24. 08. 2008 v 16:03 -0400:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:18:35 +0200
> "Pav Lucistnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:03:21 -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote
> >
> > > Is anyone experimenting problems bui
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:18:35 +0200
"Pav Lucistnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:03:21 -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote
>
> > Is anyone experimenting problems building sysutils/lsof in 8.0-
> > CURRENT ? It seems for me that this port is curr
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:03:21 -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote
> Is anyone experimenting problems building sysutils/lsof in 8.0-
> CURRENT ? It seems for me that this port is currently broken, but I
> wanted to gather some inputs before submitting a problem-report.
Yes this is a known pr
Hi,
Is anyone experimenting problems building sysutils/lsof in 8.0-CURRENT ?
It seems for me that this port is currently broken, but I wanted to gather
some inputs before submitting a problem-report.
Here is the compilation result:
===> Building for lsof-4.81A,2
(cd lib; make DEBUG=&
Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:14 PM
> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: State of sysutils/lsof on RELENG_6
>
>
> This is more of a "FYI" mail than that of "it&#
This is more of a "FYI" mail than that of "it's broken! Fix it!".
Chances are users will mail -ports about this eventually.
Today on EFNet #bsdports, it was mentioned that on a users' RELENG_6_3
machine, sysutils/lsof wasn't building. I tried the same on our
> >> => lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist
> >> in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
> >> => Attempting to fetch from
> >> http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/.
> >> fetch:
> >> http://ftp.cerias.purdue.ed
etch from
http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/.
fetch:
http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2:
Not Found
[..]
=> Attempting to fetch from
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/.
fetch:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBS
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
see below;;
jihad# make fetch
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=> lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist
in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fetch from
http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:57:46PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 02:39:21PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:56:20PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > I was talking about GETTING the distfile onto the freebsd.org mirrors.
> >
> > I'm working on th
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 02:39:21PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:56:20PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > I was talking about GETTING the distfile onto the freebsd.org mirrors.
>
> I'm working on this now. I've never had to do something like this
> before but from what
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Conor McDermottroe
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 12:35 PM
To: Wesley Shields
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Byung-Hee HWANG
Subject: Re: sysutils/lsof cannot fetch distfile ;;
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 12:53 -0500, Wesley Shields wrote:
> If
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:56:20PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I was talking about GETTING the distfile onto the freebsd.org mirrors.
I'm working on this now. I've never had to do something like this
before but from what I can gather placing it in ~/distfiles on freefall
will eventually get it
Larry Rosenman writes:
> I suspect it's because of everyone pounding on
> lsof.itap.purdue.edu, and hitting login limits.
>
> Is there any way to speed up the process of it hitting the
> @freebsd.org mirrors?
Try adding RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES= "yes" to /etc/make.conf.
Huff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 12:55 PM
To: Larry Rosenman
Cc: Conor McDermottroe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wesley Shields; Byung-Hee HWANG
Subject: Re: sysutils/lsof cannot fetch distfile ;;
Larry Rosenman writes:
> I suspect it's because of everyone pou
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 12:53 -0500, Wesley Shields wrote:
> If the problem persists I'd suggest a packet capture so we can see
> exactly what is going on.
I re-ran it while running tcpdump.
It appears that the FTP server at lsof.itap.purdue.edu refuses
connections from machines with no reverse DN
> > => Attempting to fetch from
> > http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/.
> > fetch:
> > http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2:
> > Not Found
> > => Attempting to fetc
ilable at:
http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2
Thanks,
Larry Rosenman
sysutils/lsof maintainer
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock
your email).
I've also seen this problem:
portupgrade output:
> => lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
> => Attempting to fetch from
> http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/.
> fetch:
> http://f
gt; Attempting to fetch from
> http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/.
> fetch:
> http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2:
> Not Found
> [..]
> => Attempting to fetch from
> ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/.
&
see below;;
jihad# make fetch
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=> lsof_4.79H.freebsd.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist
in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fetch from
http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/lsof/.
fetch:
http://ftp.cerias.purdue
;
> >>>Please Cc: me when replying.
> >>>
> >>>I can't build sysutils/lsof on -CURRENT (2007.05.20.12.00.00).
> >>>
> >>
> >>see pr ports/113123
> >>
> >>I submitted it today in response to this exact problem
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:48:06PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi,
Please Cc: me when replying.
I can't build sysutils/lsof on -CURRENT (2007.05.20.12.00.00).
see pr ports/113123
I submitted it
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 03:48:06PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Please Cc: me when replying.
> >
> >I can't build sysutils/lsof on -CURRENT (2007.05.20.12.00.00).
> >
>
> see pr
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi,
Please Cc: me when replying.
I can't build sysutils/lsof on -CURRENT (2007.05.20.12.00.00).
see pr ports/113123
I submitted it today in response to this exact problem on advice
from Vic Abell (LSOF Maintainer).
I don't know when i
Hi,
Please Cc: me when replying.
I can't build sysutils/lsof on -CURRENT (2007.05.20.12.00.00).
% ===> Building for lsof-4.77
% (cd lib; make DEBUG="-O2" CFGF="-fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentium-m
-march=pentium-m -DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -DHASF_VNODE -DHAS
54 matches
Mail list logo
