On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 02:45:38PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Juergen Lock (from Sat, 26 Mar 2011
> 20:28:38 +0100):
>
> > Hi, now that the vdr ports are finally committed here are some
> > updated notes:
>
> Hi all, I wiki-fied this mail (http://wiki.freebsd.org/VDR).
> Int
Quoting Juergen Lock (from Sat, 26 Mar 2011
20:28:38 +0100):
Hi, now that the vdr ports are finally committed here are some
updated notes:
Hi all, I wiki-fied this mail (http://wiki.freebsd.org/VDR).
Interested people can now enhance it (I don't).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
1 bulls, 3 cows.
h
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:14:29AM -0700, VDR User wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >> Considering that vdpau for 1.1 was abandoned long ago and no
> >> backporting is being done, I strongly urge finding a reasonable
> >> solution to provide 1.2. The vdpau portion i
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Juergen Lock wrote:
>> Considering that vdpau for 1.1 was abandoned long ago and no
>> backporting is being done, I strongly urge finding a reasonable
>> solution to provide 1.2. The vdpau portion is stable, I can't speak
>> for the rest of it, though I don't real
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 08:23:20AM -0700, VDR User wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > Well it would also have to work for all the other ports that use
> > libxine too, vdr is just one of them... And if it were really
> > stable wouldn't they do a release? :) (Alt
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Yes bash is in ports.
Good news! :)
> Well it would also have to work for all the other ports that use
> libxine too, vdr is just one of them... And if it were really
> stable wouldn't they do a release? :) (Although I guess one could
> d
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 07:05:01PM -0700, VDR User wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >> You can automate most of the stuff required to run VDR, and everything
> >> else can be put in a .conf somewhere for the stuff that can't. I've
> >> found this extremely useful an
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Juergen Lock wrote:
>> You can automate most of the stuff required to run VDR, and everything
>> else can be put in a .conf somewhere for the stuff that can't. I've
>> found this extremely useful and worth looking into for any level user.
>>
> Well passing plugin
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 02:55:12PM -0700, VDR User wrote:
> There are a few things I'd like to comment on.
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Juergen Lock
> wrote:
> > So what is vdr? It's something like a luxury settop box/pvr on a pc
> > to receive/watch/record/stream digital tv chann
There are a few things I'd like to comment on.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> So what is vdr? It's something like a luxury settop box/pvr on a pc
> to receive/watch/record/stream digital tv channels with epg (electronic
> program guide), timers, client/server networ
Hi, now that the vdr ports are finally committed here are some
updated notes:
So what is vdr? It's something like a luxury settop box/pvr on a pc
to receive/watch/record/stream digital tv channels with epg (electronic
program guide), timers, client/server networking, webinterface etc pp.
So if y
11 matches
Mail list logo
