On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Robert Burmeister <
robert.burmeis...@utoledo.edu> wrote:
> On 9/8/2014 3:43 AM, Jan Beich wrote:
>
>> Robert_Burmeister writes:
>>
>> So, what alternatives are there to add controls to Mplayer2?
>>>
>>> mplayer2 is mostly dead or at least not actively developed.
On 9/8/2014 3:43 AM, Jan Beich wrote:
Robert_Burmeister writes:
So, what alternatives are there to add controls to Mplayer2?
mplayer2 is mostly dead or at least not actively developed. It has a
fork called mpv with simple OSD-based GUI as well as several projects
building GUI on top.
http:/
Robert_Burmeister writes:
> So, what alternatives are there to add controls to Mplayer2?
>
mplayer2 is mostly dead or at least not actively developed. It has a
fork called mpv with simple OSD-based GUI as well as several projects
building GUI on top.
http://bakamplayer.u8sand.net/ (Mono or QT5)
So, what alternatives are there to add controls to Mplayer2?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/smplayer-dependency-on-mplayer1-tp5913645p5946778.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Mon, 19 May 2014 17:54:26 -0700
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> Looking at the Makefile for multimedia/smplayer it appears to me
> that smplayer is dependent upon the 1.x version of mplayer being
> installed, however there exists what I would guess is a later
> and better version of mplayer cal
mplayer2 not mplayer1 good compatibility
--
Regards.
By: Haowu Ge; PGP:B7C9977A
WWW: https://www.7axu.com/
2014-05-20 8:54 GMT+08:00 Ronald F. Guilmette :
>
> Looking at the Makefile for multimedia/smplayer it appears to me
> that smplayer is dependent upon the 1.x version of mplayer being
> i
Looking at the Makefile for multimedia/smplayer it appears to me
that smplayer is dependent upon the 1.x version of mplayer being
installed, however there exists what I would guess is a later
and better version of mplayer called multimedia/mplayer2 in the
ports tree.
So why is smplayer dependent
