On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:12:44PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Jerry wrote:
> >
> >> I agree whole heartily. Unfortunately, all too many ports have
> >> options that all cryptic in nature. There really needs to be be
On Thu, 30 May 2013, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Jerry wrote:
I agree whole heartily. Unfortunately, all too many ports have
options that all cryptic in nature. There really needs to be better
documentation as to what the options actually do. Perhaps having an
additio
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 15:09:55 +0200
> Michael Gmelin articulated:
>
> > On Thu, 30 May 2013 14:08:29 +0200
> > John Marino wrote:
> >
> > > On 5/30/2013 13:27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > > > I assume there are better ways to make this clear. It might
On 30 May 2013 16:57, Jerry wrote:
> I agree whole heartily. Unfortunately, all too many ports have
> options that all cryptic in nature. There really needs to be better
> documentation as to what the options actually do. Perhaps having an
> additional file in each port named "OPTDESC", or whateve
On Thu, 30 May 2013 15:09:55 +0200
Michael Gmelin articulated:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 14:08:29 +0200
> John Marino wrote:
>
> > On 5/30/2013 13:27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > > I assume there are better ways to make this clear. It might even
> > > make sense to have a basic distinction on the port
On Thu, 30 May 2013 14:08:29 +0200
John Marino wrote:
> On 5/30/2013 13:27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > I assume there are better ways to make this clear. It might even
> > make sense to have a basic distinction on the ports system level -
> > options that provide additional features vs. options th
On 5/30/2013 13:27, Michael Gmelin wrote:
I assume there are better ways to make this clear. It might even
make sense to have a basic distinction on the ports system level -
options that provide additional features vs. options that
change the (default) behavior of the port.
Isn't this implicit
Hi,
Since shells/bash has been converted to OptionsNG the following new
options show up:
[x] COLONBREAKSWORDS Colons break words
[x] IMPLICITCDUse directory name alone to cd into it
both enabled by default. This does not change the previous behaviour of
the port, when those were hidden
